this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
344 points (98.3% liked)

News

36943 readers
1625 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 192 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Showing this was not about security at all.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 62 points 4 months ago

It never was

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

One could argue surveillance and tracking is about security. They'd be wrong. But they could argue that.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

That's absolutely about security. Just not yours. There's a lot of people whose financial security is at risk if they can't sell that data.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 20 points 4 months ago

Well, it's never been about security, it's about surveillance. But it is reasonable to assume that REAL ID is their most efficient way to track travelers, and if you make them use their less efficient methods of tracking, they'll offset the difference by charging you directly.

[–] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 109 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Title leaves out "or passport."

In a push to get you to think you must have a Real ID, I've noticed the media constantly leaves out or minimizes the fact that a passport is sufficient to get you through an airport or any other place a Real ID is required.

So no extra fee of you have a passport.

[–] WaistGunnerPug@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

You know some dumb shit TSA is gonna not understand that part.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 14 points 4 months ago

I've always just considered a passport to be a Real ID™.

From the U.S. Department of State website: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/passports/passports-realid.html

The U.S. passport book and passport card are both REAL ID compliant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 94 points 4 months ago (5 children)

TSA says the fee will cover the administrative and IT costs associated with the ID verification program and ensure the expense is covered by the travelers and not the taxpayers.

Ah, that makes sense. It costs $45 per person to do exactly what they were doing without additional cost up until now.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, so there are certainly going to be some administrative and maintenance costs associated with any system, and they are currently paid for by the tax payer. For arguments sake, lets just say that cost should instead be put solely onto people who choose not to take the steps necessary to get a REAL ID, ignoring the many legitimate reasons someone may not wish to or be able to do that.

The follow up question then, is how much does the fee need to be to offset that cost? Well, it will need to be based on the number of those who will not get a REAL ID even after the fee introduction, so it will likely be lower than it is now given the fee as a motivation. Currently 44% of issued id's in the US are without REAL ID status. Let's say that the vast majority of those people are motivated by this fee or other factors to finally get a REAL ID in the next year or two. Let's say a bit over 75% of those currently without it are motivated to get one now (a major over estimation, surely). So only 10% of all US citizens with state issued ids wouldn't have REAL ID.

Given an average of 2.9 million Americans fly every single day, that's 290,000 non REAL ID flyers a day. Times $45, that's $13 million per day, or $4.745 billion per year... to do administration and maintenance on an existing system.

If that is the true cost, that means that 40% of their current congressionally allocated budget of $11.3 billion is spent on maintaining this one system alone. That is simply absurd and anyone with half a lick of sense should know that. So either they are expecting well more than 90% of people to get a REAL ID soon or they are just massively overcharging people and pocketing the difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

It doesn't cost a tenth of that to do anything they're allegedly doing now or have done ever. Fuck TSA sideways with a Midwestern wool sock after a week layover in Tulsa. 🤌🏼

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

To be fair, in CA it costs exactly $45 to get a renewal REAL ID drivers license. That is paid by the traveler, not the taxpayer. The difference is that is a one-time fee to get a card that works for either 5 or 10 years, versus a fee every time you fly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 75 points 4 months ago (3 children)

We still need to go through the process to make sure that we verify who you are

As long as I don't have any weapons it shouldn't matter.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

but how else will we track where everyone is all the time

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Unless you are using a fake ID and fake credit card then they already have that data?

They know John Smith who lives at 123 Main Street in Bumbfuck, WI and who paid with credit card 1234567890123456 is flying from MSN to LAX on December 1st, 2025 and returning via the same route on December 3rd, 2025.

The RealID requirements are to, theoretically, streamline the process of matching person to face with more standardized ID requirements. Like all ID related legislature there is good and bad there.

But if your focus is on The Man tracking you? This changes nothing unless you are already actively committing fraud at MANY levels.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (7 children)

neat. there is no reason they even need an id. do you need one to gain access to the highways?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago (20 children)

A passport is a really good thing to have, and lasts much longer than a Real ID state license. It ends up costing like $13/yr and it opens up the whole world to you. It blows my mind that on;y 50% of US citizens ever bother getting one.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Many citizens don't leave their state. Plenty of them are hand to mouth and can't afford groceries. Even local travel is a luxury to some, so I can understand why they might not have the desire to go through the process and pay for the passport, not to mention that many people don't know their SSN or have their birth certificates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well over half of us live paycheck to paycheck and traveling is exorbitantly expensive. Especially international travel.

It sucks being broke.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Man, some of us are annoyed every time we have to drive into town to shop for groceries or go to work. I'm surrounded by nature at home. I don't want to travel. You'd have to B. A. Baracas me to get me on an airplane or boat. I neither need nor want a passport.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Upvoted purely for a-teaming

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 47 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (11 children)

It would only make sense if it was a one time fee, and you got your ID as a result.

We also know it’s not about security, or you couldn’t fly without one.

We know it’s a cash grab because they’re counting on a “built-in” amount of flyers who won’t have or will refuse to get ID with privacy issues. If, by some anomaly, more or all flyers acquire the ID, then we’d see maintenance fees added and the fee itself increased to maintain revenue certainty - but who are we kidding, those things will eventually happen anyways.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

Basically extortion to continue the absurd, ineffective security theater.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 30 points 4 months ago

without a REAL ID or passport

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

So is this just legal way to bribe the TSA

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I paid for a real id license when they were first available in my state, and I’ve paid for a renewal. I disagree with the surveillance society they enable but I’m also a realist who wants to travel conveniently.

But I’ve still never gotten one. When it comes down to it, actually getting a real id license requires taking a day off work and waiting in line at the Registry …… whereas I can renew a standard license online and have a few years left on my passport

One of the many ways RealID has been a fiasco is RMV/DMV’s not staffing up to support it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

oh so it was never about security.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it that uncommon to have a passport in the US? That's basically part of the common ID paper you'd have here.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Yes. We can travel over 3000 miles and still be in the same country with about every climate. Meanwhile for a family of 4 it would cost almost $700 to get passports and involve waiting weeks. Then flying say Seattle to Paris for instance would cost about $3000 before actually doing anything there. This is in addition to the $300-$400 spent every 5-7 years on normal identity documents that you need for other purposes. This cost varies substantially state to state.

Meanwhile families here are facing drastically escalating costs especially housing and medical.

Compare that to a European who could travel 100 km on the train and be in another country.

Americans have both increased dis-incentives and less incentives to travel internationally compared to Europeans.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

I never got one because my license expired during covid and i didn't have a recent bill/bank statement (and I had no intention of walking into a DMV at that time) fortunately i do have a passport that i plan to renew as soon as it expires, but my passport is supposed to be for international travel, not domestic.

it wasn't that long ago that you only needed a birth certificate to travel to the caribbean or a border country. this is getting out of hand.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The agency warns that even then, there is no guarantee that individuals will be cleared to cross through the security checkpoint.

Bummer, that’s another $45 to re-check until they get it right. I’m guessing this will happen a lot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, guess I’ll have to not fly even harder 🤷‍♂️

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Makes me wonder why they don’t want people flying. All these different things being done to make it harder for the average person to fly. I suppose it could just be incompetence, but it really feels like there’s intent behind it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

While this is ridiculous. The original requirement date for a real id was 2008. It has been 20 years since real id was passed. You have had 20 years to get one.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Dude it was hard enough for my wife to get a new ID (not REAL) when we moved from RI to MA.

I do all the bills and handle all the finances. My credit was better (now we are about equal) and so all the utilities and most the credit cards are in my name. Not to mention most of them are paperless.

At the time, I think she was also still on a cell phone plan with her siblings.

So, like, absolutely no official-enough mail coming to our house to her name. And they need 2.

What, exactly, is the purpose of an ID, and why does it need my SSN and two pieces of mail? How does that identify me, as a person, any more than a supporting document like an existing US Passport? If I qualified for a US Passport, why the hell do I need so much more on top of that for just a state issued ID.

The whole thing is a scam to bully minorities and put an additional burden on traveling for low-income families. I wonder how many people are missing flights to some important and unexpected event (i.e. a funeral) because they never fly and never had a reason to get a REAL ID.

For that matter, I'd really like to know what TSA gets out of a REAL ID that they don't get out of a regular license, for domestic travel? They don't care about my proof of residence, they only care that the name matches the boarding pass and the face, and isn't Islamic or otherwise off-white.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Shhh... You're saying the quiet parts out loud.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

How long until they require it to vote so it shuts out a majority of the voters from participating in elections?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grinde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

My state didn't start offering them until 2018, and our IDs are good for 5 years. Also, our DVS was a complete shitshow at the time with regular licenses taking up to 6 months to arrive, and double that for a real id. People avoided them so they wouldn't have to renew a temporary license every 3 months.

Realistically, people in my state have had an average of one opportunity to get a real id on renewal.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›