this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)

chat

8532 readers
81 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Or is that just the most exhausting and obnoxious thing possible?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nasezero@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If you enjoyed Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul, and/or high-concept sci-fi, just watch it. Since others have already put the Stalin line into context, I'll add another plot point that clowns hard on Carol's USian individualism:

Episode 3Carol tries to goes grocery shopping in this episode, only to find her local Sprouts (bougie Whole Foods-style store) completely empty. So she calls up the plurbs to complain, to which they helpfully offer to bring her anything she needs. She then starts on a rant about how she's "a very iNdEpEnDenT person" and doesn't want anyone "waiting on her," and asks if they can restock the grocery store "by Friday, I'm thinking?" Which is then immediately followed by dozens of plurbs showing up with trailers full of food, and working in unison to stock the grocery store so Carol can "be independent."

It's a very obvious commentary on the modern person's concept of independence. It's also fucking hilarious, as soon as she was talking about them stocking it "by Friday" I knew we were about to see a montage of Plurbs swarming and finishing that shit now. chefs-kiss

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

When she

spoilerGot specific instructions on how to bag her trash and despite having absolutely no other responsibilities in her life she still consciously chooses not to follow the instructions

it felt very much like interactions with average US Americans in my experience.

[–] Arahnya@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

I loved this part so much hahaha

[–] abc@hexbear.net 38 points 3 days ago

that does sound exhausting and obnoxious but as someone who is watching it, it's only anti-communist if you go into it thinking 'communism is whenever everyone is a hivemind and has no free-will' which very well be may Vince Gilligan's take on it I guess but I think he's just doing invasion of the body snatchers 2025

[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago

It has one weird anti-communist line and even that's in a gray area because Carol is kind of a dumbass and has wrong opinions.

[–] TheDeed@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a single line from a character that is explicitly shown to not have great takes.

I like the show so far, and it doesn't seem to be anticommunist any more than most US TV.

I say this as someone who stopped watching Stranger Things many years ago because it was anticommunist slop fare.

We'll see how the first season shakes out, but I am having a lot of fun watching this show and I dont see anything that would make me write it off just yet.

To anyone reading this thread and having doubts, watch the show for yourself and be the judge. I don't think you'll have a bad time watching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

The show is a criticism of American chauvinism if anything. At least so far. The main character is a typical privileged upper class white American lib. She’s a cynic, and has all the bad American beliefs.

Like the Stalin line someone else mentioned read more like her ignorance and inability to imagine anything outside the propaganda she grew up with, than the show trying to be anti-communist.

I mean spoilers, but that Stalin line was delivered moments before we find she was responsible for like 10 million people dying… I think the show did that on purpose. Like Americans always saying everybody else is the evilest then going around committing the worst atrocities ever….

I’d say it’s a good watch, but I mean I don’t have expectation an American show is NOT gonna be lib shit. So let’s see.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you think thats the thesis of the show you're gonna be in for a rude awakening. The other survivors are either in denial or exploiting the situation (except for the radio guy).
You are not supposed to be convinced by Laxmi's rant. Laxmi is wrong in a way that we have been shown repeatedly, she is as unpleasant as Carol is at her worst, and she is obviously a hypocrite who won't consider Carol's perspective because she is in total denial about the situation. If Carol is right her son is functionally dead, so Carol is wrong.

Carol also "killed 10 million people" by being upset and telling one instance of the hivemind to fuck off, which caused them to get into accidents due to being unable to cope with the stress of that. That is extremely obviously not her fault, something the hivemind also highlights.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CriticalOtaku@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

I popped in the first episode just for this post-

The show seems to be an elaborate Thought Experiment in the vein of a lot of classic sci-fi: How would the average upper/middle class American react to their society transforming from an individualist one to a collectivist one overnight?

The POV character in the show isn't exactly the most flattering portrayal of the average upper-class American, I'll say that much.

Yeah, the hivemind is an old redscare sci-fi trope but I don't know, the vibes I'm getting are that ol' Vince "Breaking Bad" Gilligan isn't exactly going weigh in on the side of American exceptionalism, but I could be wrong I only watched 1 episode.

Edit: I thought about it some more- If the hivemind is actually supposed to be villainous, there's a queer reading where the hivemind could represent hetero-normative society attempting to stamp out what makes the main character (who is a lesbian) "different". But I'd need to see more of the show to see how exactly it handles queer identity beyond what was introduced in the first episode.

Double edit: Ok made it thru episode 2 and the entire scene set on Air Force One of a white person belligerently "explaining" to a room of coloured people that they have to save the world, only to engender the response of "Wait what why? The world doesn't need saving from this" is waaaaaaaaaay too on-the-nose that there really isn't any further room for discussion here.

[–] rufuscrispo@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

Also, pre- and post-hivemind, the show has been deliberate in highlighting Carol's flaws, isolation, and poor decision making, specifically her being a functional alcoholic. In some regards, the hivemind is correct; Carol does need fixing. So I would think the Stalin namedrop right before she accidentally kills millions of people fits into the "bumbling empire" trope of a typical lib in the imperial core.

Plus, the anti-communist message is blunted slightly by Carol's attempts to build solidarity (on the surface) with the other individuals but being completely ill equipped to do so, specifically because she's an American chauvinist. So she orients her position out of her own personal gripes rather than providing a benefit for the others to rally around. She even begins by asking the hivemind, "how many of them speak English?" lol. I mean, c'mon! If you really think the world is at stake, put in a little effort!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All US media is anti-communist garbage in a way

[–] XiaCobolt@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Star Wars is fascist, Harry Potter is fascist neo-feudal dreck, selfie-obsession is fascist, British soap-operas are fascist, sci-fi is generally fascist, ironic detachment is fascist, porn is fascist. Masscult under imperialism is inherently fascistic. Sorry to spoil your 'fun'.

-Phil Greaves lenin-laugh

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

At first I thought it was anti-communist, but then I think it's really just anti- AI with a hint of critique of "independent" living

[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

What the hell is a Pluribus?

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s when you have more than one bus.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gramxi@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

who want their pluribussy ate

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

Don't sexualize the pluribus.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

Nothing, what's plurbing with you?

[–] fanbois@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That one thing from Rick and Morty that was funny for a week or so.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CutieBootieTootie@hexbear.net 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What does it have to do with communism? Its not a strong metaphor for a communist society as the entire social structure of the species is fundamentally altered where class distinctions are no longer relevant, instead of what one might imagine today as communist countries as those still working through the contradictions of transitioning to a socialist and then hopefully communist society.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well I haven't seen the show (hence my question) but my impression is that it's prestige TV slop that relies on the audience's understanding of the abstract Other as an ontological antithesis to the individual and freedom for its central conflict; that's a contradiction that serves as the structure of almost all anticommunist narratives. Even if Vince Gilligan isn't specifically trying to make an anticommunist piece of media, the only way it could avoid that trap is by actively steering into it and biting the bullet, making the hivemind the hero (but even this message would probably fly above the audience's head because of how strong individualist culture is; much like how the anti-hegemonic masculinity message of Breaking Bad flew over the heads of its male audience).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think people are interpreting it that way because the plot line is so similar to invasion of the body snatchers which is more explicitly anti communist and came out during McCarthyism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pacifist@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

the "what am I, Stalin?" line was crazy

[–] D61@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

I've only watched the first episode so far, if you're friends aren't interested in your analysis, I'd be interested in reading your thoughts.

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

86 comments, 43 upbears

oh yeah we're plurbin'

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

It's good you should watch it

[–] companero@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What I'm getting from it so far is mostly "AI bad." One could argue that AI is a proxy for collectivism in the twisted mind of a liberal, but I don't know.

I feel like the show could easily veer in another direction to make a larger point. Or not.

It's perfectly watchable slop either way shrug-outta-hecks

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

i like it, there's obviously a individualist vs collectivist aspect but it doesn't harp on irl politics too much there's a single throwaway line about Stalin but there's a lot worse and more in other (subjectively)good shows, it doesn't force to viewer into thinking the hive is inherently bad(imo the hive is just a sci-fi gestalt mind not an allegory for communism like so many other hive minds in fiction, people have been commenting its like AI which Bince as said its explicitly not and it was written about a decade ago, but I see where people are getting that from), its a well made enjoyable show imo watch one ep and see what you guys think

Honestly I'm refusing to watch anything from Apple TV until its officially finished because they've cancelled so many things. I'm not getting invested into something from Vincent Fucking Gilligan for it to get ended prematurely. Had it happen too many times on streaming services. I'll never forgive Netflix for ending Santa Clarita Diet

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I hated and everyone who liked it should be ashamed of themselves

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trompete@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

The vast majority of scenes, details, plot points, "stuff" (both the stuff it points to >>>this is important<<< and the more subtle stuff) just do not strike me is fitting into the theory that this is trying to make some anticommunist point.

This is a concept show, everything must be assumed to be there for a reason. If a theory about what the message is here doesn't explain most of the scenes, it's probably wrong.

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (10 children)

I mean, the protagonist seems pretty obviously in the wrong, she's not a good person and most all of the other non-integrated people have no problem with it. The hivemind is genuinely not dystopian, at least yet.

The Stalin line is a little anti-communist though, but just the normal amount, not a part of the core theme.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

No. She is. What are we doing here? While Carol is a complex character with multiple flaws, the argument we see presented by the other survivors are either facile ("I sure do like having a harem!"), or based on information we know to be untrue ("Each instance of the hivemind remains an independent individual"). She gets dinged for not even having asked the hivemind what it's like, but she's pretty obviously not a villain protagonist.

The hivemind is genuinely not dystopian

It killed near a billion people to assert itself, it refuses to give people choice in their assimilation and it cannot handle the idea of something not going to the plan to the point of shutting down.

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Not to mention think of how viscerally disgusted most of us would be at the prospect of AI bringing our loved one's likeness to life in visual form with the imitation of personality etc. Now think about it in the flesh. Oh laxmi may seem fine with it now but days go by and her son not doing things out of lock step with her whims will get to her and she will move out of the denial stage. This is a mindfuck that no one really is ready for when reality starts to hit because everyone you know is pretty much gone

[–] EveningCicada@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

"I sure do like having a harem!"

Pluribussy. (somebody had to say it)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah she's acting how a lot of people would act tbh. Almost a billion had to be killed for the hivemind to get to this. That is catastrophic anyway you look at it. The hint at the end of the last episode could be organic material recycled for efficiency. Maybe human corpses too which would be hilarious especially with the wolves digging her fiance out maybe being a hint. That would horrify anyone and we all know those near billions gotta go somewhere. What happened to your grandpa Laxmi? agony-shivering

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›