that does sound exhausting and obnoxious but as someone who is watching it, it's only anti-communist if you go into it thinking 'communism is whenever everyone is a hivemind and has no free-will' which very well be may Vince Gilligan's take on it I guess but I think he's just doing invasion of the body snatchers 2025
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)
chat
8538 readers
207 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It has one weird anti-communist line and even that's in a gray area because Carol is kind of a dumbass and has wrong opinions.
All US media is anti-communist garbage in a way
Star Wars is fascist, Harry Potter is fascist neo-feudal dreck, selfie-obsession is fascist, British soap-operas are fascist, sci-fi is generally fascist, ironic detachment is fascist, porn is fascist. Masscult under imperialism is inherently fascistic. Sorry to spoil your 'fun'.
-Phil Greaves 
trvth nvke
Also its 9 episodes of 45-60 minutes, do you really want to watch 6.75-9 hours of a show you dont think you will like just to say its bad?
My body is a machine that turns media into criticism.
There's a single line from a character that is explicitly shown to not have great takes.
I like the show so far, and it doesn't seem to be anticommunist any more than most US TV.
I say this as someone who stopped watching Stranger Things many years ago because it was anticommunist slop fare.
We'll see how the first season shakes out, but I am having a lot of fun watching this show and I dont see anything that would make me write it off just yet.
To anyone reading this thread and having doubts, watch the show for yourself and be the judge. I don't think you'll have a bad time watching.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What does it have to do with communism? Its not a strong metaphor for a communist society as the entire social structure of the species is fundamentally altered where class distinctions are no longer relevant, instead of what one might imagine today as communist countries as those still working through the contradictions of transitioning to a socialist and then hopefully communist society.
Well I haven't seen the show (hence my question) but my impression is that it's prestige TV slop that relies on the audience's understanding of the abstract Other as an ontological antithesis to the individual and freedom for its central conflict; that's a contradiction that serves as the structure of almost all anticommunist narratives. Even if Vince Gilligan isn't specifically trying to make an anticommunist piece of media, the only way it could avoid that trap is by actively steering into it and biting the bullet, making the hivemind the hero (but even this message would probably fly above the audience's head because of how strong individualist culture is; much like how the anti-hegemonic masculinity message of Breaking Bad flew over the heads of its male audience).
It's hard to get into it without spoilers so I'll try to be unspoilery while giving the general of the first season so far:
spoiler
The main character is pretty glib and cynical. Even before the event that kicks off the series, she is shown to be a bummer. She struggles with enjoying things and seems to resent other people's ability to enjoy things. It's hard to say that the show frames her as being correct in her stubborn individuality. So far her only valid reason for being angry is that her girlfriend dies during the initial reboot of humanity as it causes her to fall down and hit her head. The hivemind hasn't actually been shown to be directly evil or mischievous. However you can read an ulterior motive or something happening behind the scenes if you try. That is to say most of her stubbornness comes from her own pre-hivemind personal issues, or social issues that don't have anything to do with the hivemind. She reveals that she had some adolescent trauma which causes distrust.
We simply don't have enough information yet to suss out the motives of the hivemind. With all we have to go on right now, they seem nice and functional as a new society, albeit a little odd. I assume this is the writer playing with our expectations about alien invasions. He did write on X-Files after all. Vince probably wants us to think something bad is going to happen to put us in the same headspace as the main character. You can also argue that there are breadcrumbs to find out the hivemind is bad. The show lays out information very much in the same way BrBa/BCS did.
I will say that this show beats you over the head with how prestige it is. You get lingering shots that seem to exist more for cinematography composition nerds than any real narrative function in the show. The show is deliberately paced with little sprinkles of information in between long character moments. It's more of a Better Call Saul character show than a Breaking Bad genre show. Apple TV lists it as "Drama, Sci-fi" so I don't think this is going to be a sci-fi heavy show, or sci-fi horror/thriller.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I think people are interpreting it that way because the plot line is so similar to invasion of the body snatchers which is more explicitly anti communist and came out during McCarthyism
The characters have directly called this out in the show and I want to give the writers a little credit that they're using the tropes as a launching pad for something more interesting. Vince is an incredible writer but does have a track record for Americanisms in his work. Personally I don't think we've seen enough of the plot yet to know what the writers intend to say with the concept.
If you enjoyed Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul, and/or high-concept sci-fi, just watch it. Since others have already put the Stalin line into context, I'll add another plot point that clowns hard on Carol's USian individualism:
Episode 3
Carol tries to goes grocery shopping in this episode, only to find her local Sprouts (bougie Whole Foods-style store) completely empty. So she calls up the plurbs to complain, to which they helpfully offer to bring her anything she needs. She then starts on a rant about how she's "a very iNdEpEnDenT person" and doesn't want anyone "waiting on her," and asks if they can restock the grocery store "by Friday, I'm thinking?" Which is then immediately followed by dozens of plurbs showing up with trailers full of food, and working in unison to stock the grocery store so Carol can "be independent."
It's a very obvious commentary on the modern person's concept of independence. It's also fucking hilarious, as soon as she was talking about them stocking it "by Friday" I knew we were about to see a montage of Plurbs swarming and finishing that shit now. 
When she
spoiler
Got specific instructions on how to bag her trash and despite having absolutely no other responsibilities in her life she still consciously chooses not to follow the instructions
it felt very much like interactions with average US Americans in my experience.
load more comments
(1 replies)
the "what am I, Stalin?" line was crazy
The show is a criticism of American chauvinism if anything. At least so far. The main character is a typical privileged upper class white American lib. She’s a cynic, and has all the bad American beliefs.
Like the Stalin line someone else mentioned read more like her ignorance and inability to imagine anything outside the propaganda she grew up with, than the show trying to be anti-communist.
I mean spoilers, but that Stalin line was delivered moments before we find she was responsible for like 10 million people dying… I think the show did that on purpose. Like Americans always saying everybody else is the evilest then going around committing the worst atrocities ever….
I’d say it’s a good watch, but I mean I don’t have expectation an American show is NOT gonna be lib shit. So let’s see.
load more comments
(5 replies)
What the hell is a Pluribus?
Nothing, what's plurbing with you?
who want their pluribussy ate
Don't sexualize the pluribus.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I popped in the first episode just for this post-
The show seems to be an elaborate Thought Experiment in the vein of a lot of classic sci-fi: How would the average upper/middle class American react to their society transforming from an individualist one to a collectivist one overnight?
The POV character in the show isn't exactly the most flattering portrayal of the average upper-class American, I'll say that much.
Yeah, the hivemind is an old redscare sci-fi trope but I don't know, the vibes I'm getting are that ol' Vince "Breaking Bad" Gilligan isn't exactly going weigh in on the side of American exceptionalism, but I could be wrong I only watched 1 episode.
Edit: I thought about it some more- If the hivemind is actually supposed to be villainous, there's a queer reading where the hivemind could represent hetero-normative society attempting to stamp out what makes the main character (who is a lesbian) "different". But I'd need to see more of the show to see how exactly it handles queer identity beyond what was introduced in the first episode.
Double edit: Ok made it thru episode 2 and the entire scene set on Air Force One of a white person belligerently "explaining" to a room of coloured people that they have to save the world, only to engender the response of "Wait what why? The world doesn't need saving from this" is waaaaaaaaaay too on-the-nose that there really isn't any further room for discussion here.
Also, pre- and post-hivemind, the show has been deliberate in highlighting Carol's flaws, isolation, and poor decision making, specifically her being a functional alcoholic. In some regards, the hivemind is correct; Carol does need fixing. So I would think the Stalin namedrop right before she accidentally kills millions of people fits into the "bumbling empire" trope of a typical lib in the imperial core.
Plus, the anti-communist message is blunted slightly by Carol's attempts to build solidarity (on the surface) with the other individuals but being completely ill equipped to do so, specifically because she's an American chauvinist. So she orients her position out of her own personal gripes rather than providing a benefit for the others to rally around. She even begins by asking the hivemind, "how many of them speak English?" lol. I mean, c'mon! If you really think the world is at stake, put in a little effort!
load more comments
(5 replies)
i like it, there's obviously a individualist vs collectivist aspect but it doesn't harp on irl politics too much there's a single throwaway line about Stalin but there's a lot worse and more in other (subjectively)good shows, it doesn't force to viewer into thinking the hive is inherently bad(imo the hive is just a sci-fi gestalt mind not an allegory for communism like so many other hive minds in fiction, people have been commenting its like AI which Bince as said its explicitly not and it was written about a decade ago, but I see where people are getting that from), its a well made enjoyable show imo watch one ep and see what you guys think
I mean, the protagonist seems pretty obviously in the wrong, she's not a good person and most all of the other non-integrated people have no problem with it. The hivemind is genuinely not dystopian, at least yet.
The Stalin line is a little anti-communist though, but just the normal amount, not a part of the core theme.
No. She is. What are we doing here? While Carol is a complex character with multiple flaws, the argument we see presented by the other survivors are either facile ("I sure do like having a harem!"), or based on information we know to be untrue ("Each instance of the hivemind remains an independent individual"). She gets dinged for not even having asked the hivemind what it's like, but she's pretty obviously not a villain protagonist.
The hivemind is genuinely not dystopian
It killed near a billion people to assert itself, it refuses to give people choice in their assimilation and it cannot handle the idea of something not going to the plan to the point of shutting down.
Not to mention think of how viscerally disgusted most of us would be at the prospect of AI bringing our loved one's likeness to life in visual form with the imitation of personality etc. Now think about it in the flesh. Oh laxmi may seem fine with it now but days go by and her son not doing things out of lock step with her whims will get to her and she will move out of the denial stage. This is a mindfuck that no one really is ready for when reality starts to hit because everyone you know is pretty much gone
"I sure do like having a harem!"
Pluribussy. (somebody had to say it)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Nah she's acting how a lot of people would act tbh. Almost a billion had to be killed for the hivemind to get to this. That is catastrophic anyway you look at it. The hint at the end of the last episode could be organic material recycled for efficiency. Maybe human corpses too which would be hilarious especially with the wolves digging her fiance out maybe being a hint. That would horrify anyone and we all know those near billions gotta go somewhere. What happened to your grandpa Laxmi? 
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
What I'm getting from it so far is mostly "AI bad." One could argue that AI is a proxy for collectivism in the twisted mind of a liberal, but I don't know.
I feel like the show could easily veer in another direction to make a larger point. Or not.
It's perfectly watchable slop either way 
I'm curious how the concept of a hivemind that literally takes over all the world except for one person is a reference to AI more than it is a reference for some ideology or political system.
They beat you over the head with the metaphor multiple times in the show. The main character has conversations with the hivemind ripped straight from AI chatbot logs.
minor spoiler
At one point she jokingly asks them for a grenade and they give it to her, not understanding the subtext/danger.
No they understand the danger fully. That is also why they hesitate with giving her a nuclear bomb, but state that if it makes her happy they would still do it. They are fully cognisant, they both know facts and can put those facts in context. We see that they are, for instance, fully capable of understanding the emotional importance of the hats.
I don't feel like you can spoil much since literally nothing that has any actual relevance to the narrative has happened since episode 1.
spoiler
Except maybe the introduction of the paraguyan guy, the milk, and possibly maybe the introduction of the pirate lady or whatever her name is in episode like 2.
I haven't seen pluribus, but tangentially I used to have the same assumption of the Borg, from Star Trek. But to be honest, I don't even think that the Borg are intended to be an anti communist allegory, despite being a hive mind. Ultimately, the hive mind's entire purpose is to fulfill the whims of the Borg Queen. In summary my point is that it's totally possible to write a hive mind, and to use it to even criticize monarchies, or any other ideology for that matter.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The vast majority of scenes, details, plot points, "stuff" (both the stuff it points to >>>this is important<<< and the more subtle stuff) just do not strike me is fitting into the theory that this is trying to make some anticommunist point.
This is a concept show, everything must be assumed to be there for a reason. If a theory about what the message is here doesn't explain most of the scenes, it's probably wrong.
Yes watch it, get on the Yuribus
Honestly I'm refusing to watch anything from Apple TV until its officially finished because they've cancelled so many things. I'm not getting invested into something from Vincent Fucking Gilligan for it to get ended prematurely. Had it happen too many times on streaming services. I'll never forgive Netflix for ending Santa Clarita Diet
I liked it and everyone who hated it should be ashamed of themselves
I've only watched the first episode so far, if you're friends aren't interested in your analysis, I'd be interested in reading your thoughts.
view more: next ›