MasterBlaster

joined 1 year ago

we dbhigh posting?

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 days ago

The characters have directly called this out in the show and I want to give the writers a little credit that they're using the tropes as a launching pad for something more interesting. Vince is an incredible writer but does have a track record for Americanisms in his work. Personally I don't think we've seen enough of the plot yet to know what the writers intend to say with the concept.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

wanky pontification incoming but while I definitely agree with the spirit of this statement whenever I see it I think that we don't really 'deserve' to be alive by the letter of the word. I think more spiritually minded people than me can easily make an argument that we do fit the strict definition of 'deserving' to live but from a material perspective I don't see how humans inherently deserve to spawn into this random chaos world. It's just a random chance thing that happened and continues to happen.

but my brain has wrinkles so my take doesn't just end there. My material stand-in for the more spiritual idea that human beings deserve life is that any human born is owed humane treatment and actualization by the humans that came before, because the human born never asked to live but the actions of the humans before them brought them into existence. therefore, every parent owes their child a dignified, healthy and happy life. stepping back further, every generation owes the next a dignified, healthy and happy life. every society owes the next blah blah you get it.

basically I've always seen the right to life as something owed to you by others, a mounting debt humanity must continue to repay, not necessarily something that is based within our character or inherent essence. you don't deserve to be alive but you don't earn that right yourself, either. it's collectively owed to you and in stable societies you get your pay out.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly I thought the suffering in the world radicalized me, or the sheer inefficiency of the distribution of resources, or the enforcement of in-groups inherent to capitalist imperialism. But nah, brother, it's just the landlords. Just thinking about them too hard pissed me off one day.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You present the worst ideas possible but attach them to Approved Brand and a leading blurb and people will immediately regard your racism science with sincerity. Really demonstrates how these monstrously bad ideas got wind in the first place.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely, I just know lots of people are acclimated to cloud services and don't see building their own library as worthwhile vs just getting it online. You can totally have best of both worlds.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

Google was perfect in 2006, nothing had to change.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

US moves to primarily exporting slop, as is tradition.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It honestly takes very minimal effort to maintain a digital library for yourself. Swipe up an old office computer from a business auction for less than $50, install linux and start running that as a server from home. Store your media and books on it, set up remote access so you can stream it to yourself from any device. You can functionally replace streaming services for your media needs this way. It has the added benefit of being slightly more material than any cloud services you could access.

If you're new to this stuff, you can also should pick up a <$100 laptop and slap a user-friendly linux distro on it, and try daily driving linux as well as maintaining your server. Even the oldest, crustiest laptop runs Linux fine. You'll pick up so many great tech skills doing this and you can still keep a windows daily driver for work or whatever.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

One of my first well received pieces was on Zomboid. Incredible piece of art

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

This made me weepy this morning :(

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 months ago

The puppy won't get any easier, it'll only get harder. It will get a lot harder before it gets any better. Honestly puppy training sucks. Are you a big dog person? Do you need to raise this dog? Why not home another older/well trained dog? Senior dogs are in dire need of homes everywhere.

That being said you will rise to a challenge if you set it for yourself. I know you probably don't resonate with that reasoning right now, but if you try to internalize it you'll find yourself fighting regardless of how bleak it all seems.

 
 
 

Developer ZA/UM says it’s actually for TikTok users.

“We intend to captivate the TikTok user with quick hits of compelling story, art, and audio, ultimately creating an all new, deeply engaging form of entertainment,” ZA/UM head Denis Havel said in a news release (via IGN).

let's gooooo I can't wait for the subway surfer in-app purchase DLC. no i'm not kidding, the store page marks it as having in-app purchases. something something capital subsuming something.

 

I just finished the Jakarta Method and it left me genuinely dismayed. Not like, astounded with how horrible it all was (I knew it was going to be horrible), but more, it made me put the book down and sit with my feelings of dismay. A little bit nauseous, unsettled, feeling a loss of hope for a lot of ideals I hold.

What a horrible period of history, in a century absolutely full of horrible periods.

 
 

That's all. Played Civ since IV and the boardgame-like nature of it meant that I've gotten a lot of friends and family into it as a means to experience video games in general.

Civ VII looks really bad, even if I haven't played it myself. Systems upon systems that aren't properly explained, that somehow feel both cluttered and less in-depth than previous entries. Three truncated games making up the segments of one larger game is lame, too. A bad solution to the problem of people burning out in the later eras.

Most of all, though, is the business model of it all. Civ already leaned into 4X DLC conventions which meant getting the whole package was an expensive endeavor, but at least, for example, Civ VI had just two major expansion packs. Civ VII is already drowning into microtransaction leader purchases.

And then there's, just, the price. It's obscene. Denuvo is devastating to see as it creates a lot of barriers to giving the thing a try. I don't get excited for games any more, but Civ VII would have been one of them.

Anyone try it themselves? Anyone in love? Anyone feel like me?

 

Anyone watch the game awards? That one show where they play a bunch of trailers for new games in between awkward awards and musical performances?

watching it is a tradition of mine. brings me back to being a kid watching E3 and occasionally being happy.

i want balatro sweep and death stranding 2 trailer

view more: next ›