providing so many features for free makes it very hard for any chess business to charge for its services
good, fuck off lol
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
providing so many features for free makes it very hard for any chess business to charge for its services
good, fuck off lol
Still, if you put the benefits aside

This framing is so bad lol
Just put aside all of the good things and it's actually bad
checkmate Lichess defenders 😎
NOOOOO you can't just make things and give them to people, you're supposed to make things and then hold the things hostage for money nooooo
The opportunities that never get built because it stops making economic sense to try
Less concerned Einstein's brain, lived and died in sweatshops etc
The focus of every ounce of my career that isn't put towards money for survival is to undercut these fuckers with FOSS. I want to do a shitload of exactly what this loser is complaining about
With our innovative pay-per-move system, we incentivize players to win matches faster, thus encouraging them to get even better!
I hate when nerds reinvent medieval enclosure and pretend it's more innovative now than it was when they were just starving peasants to feed sheep. Cool, he's paywalled chess and turned it into an exclusionary game that deters people from learning it. This is good for chess and isn't just him being a parasite copying the work of the community he's stealing from.
The "politics" is lgbt people btw
Woah. Really? I thought it was just because the founder was a commie. Interesting to know this person is a queerphobe as well.
https://x.com/durarbayli/status/1680916086731030533
Should have posted the link earlier. Also sounds like he's mad they acknowledged a country his country was genociding (although I haven't looked into that claim at all, which is why I didn't include it)
screenshots

Holy shit he’s actually complaining about chess being invaded by woke culture
What a massive dork this guy is.
Thanks for mentioning this btw. I would have never known he was this much of a reactionary shithead.
It's a major issue in the chess world, sadly. Just look at the reactions any time the concept of mixed-gender high level competition is brought up. They will absolutely seethe at the very idea of having to compete against a woman. Even worse if the person who wants to be included is trans.
I don't play or follow chess literally at all. I knew there was a huge misogyny problem with men claiming that women are just fundamentally worse at chess, I didn't know this was controversial, though. I thought the competition categories were already "open" and "women" and I've definitely heard the usual whining by transphobes about letting trans women compete in women's events. There are even chuds who object to the open category? Bizarre.
I can't believe these people are out here playing chess without a profit incentive.
Dude is complaining about capitalism weeding out inefficiencies in the market... The one time it does its job he hates it, amazing. I would frame this if it didn't mean I would need to rent a printer in one way or another.
I contributed to Hexbear with like 5 (five) subpar original memes. I am still waiting for someone to pay up. I suggest reinstituting downbears on a Pay-Per-Bear model, it's just econ 101.
That's a wonderful idea! If you'd like me to boost it with an upbear, please send 0.0000001 bitcoin to my wallet address
As if modern Chess wasn't already built on the shoulders of generations of Soviet citizens
I mean, when you think of a stereotypically commie board game, if you know anything about Soviet life, you're going to think of chess. Continuing to be Annoyingly Communist about it is just one more way Western commies are stuck in the Soviet era, in the best way.
The main game I played with my dad as a kid was chess LOL, and yes, my parents are from the USSR
there's something fundamentally wrong with the Lichess model: it destroys the chess market
GOOD

Nothing is truly free.
that's why we're going to charge your family for this bullet
The problem with Wolfenstein 3D is someone already made it and I DESERVE TO BE THE ONE WHO MADE IT what the hell guys. I can't believe you let woke do this to me. I was going to be a millionaire. 
The funny thing is that at its core, this argument isn't even that wrong if you applied it as a criticism of the structure of capitalism itself. Capitalism trends toward monopoly and monopolies will make it impossible for new competitors to get started and do innovation. It's also true that when something is available for free it stifles growth in the relevant industries, another example of this is how countries that receive food aid will develop their agricultural industry around growing cash crops because farmers won't be able to compete with the free aid.
But all of that is just an argument against having market forces decide everything in the first place. If society has the capacity in both technology and in productivity to make great services and enough goods for everyone, why would it be necessary for these things to be competed for in the first place? We can just... have free chess and food for everyone, because we have the means to do that and compensate the people who make it happen. There is literally nothing to be gained from it being a competive process.

rename this comm NOW
"Lichess sucks because i can't rent seek on it" piss baby loser

I was thinking about why so many in the radical left participate in "Lichess"
The reason is the left's lack of consumer ethics ('play for free'' rather than 'pay then play') and, in a Carlsenian sense, to elevate alternative sexual archetypes in the chess marketplace ('fastest en passant').
I hope capitalists make this argument more and more
Time to add loot boxes, skins, and gambling on chess games
Is it even really a game if you can't pay extra for your queen to be a big booba waifu with jiggle physics?
Sucks to suck
It just depresses me that people's brains are so completely fucked at this point
Bro...think of all the profit that could've been...damn commies ffs
I know praising "FreePooThrowing" is as popular as ever. On the sanitation Reddit, someone shows up every second Saturday to say FreePooThrowing is the best thing that ever happened to waste disposal.
I’ve actually contributed to FreePooThrowing myself as a demonstrator and blogger. I stopped because of their ideological stance – that’s a different story. I’m not pretending FreePooThrowing hasn’t done a lot of good. In fact, my own project, PooThrowing+, wouldn’t have progressed so fast without FreePooThrowing existing.
Still, if you put the benefits aside for a moment, there’s something fundamentally wrong with the FreePooThrowing model: it destroys the poop-throwing market.
Providing so much high-velocity, premium-grade feces for free makes it very hard for any poop-throwing business to charge for its services. If businesses can’t charge, they can’t pay professional throwers properly. If professionals can’t earn enough, they’re pushed to throw in poorly-ventilated, substandard arenas. Conditions don’t improve for professionals, and that eventually leads to a less splattered, less satisfying experience for casual fans, too. That’s the vicious cycle.
Nothing is truly free. Someone always pays — with money, dignity, or the glorious, complex throws that never get built because it stopped making economic sense to try.
EDIT: meant to comment top level

I don't even like chess but I played some games against LiChess Stockfish just to spite this man lmao
