this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
124 points (99.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14187 readers
743 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gramxi@hexbear.net 65 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"breaks silence" what the hell is a mayor talking about foreign countries for?

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eric Adams has finally settled the debate: Turkey invented baklava, not Greece

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] john_browns_beard@hexbear.net 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At this pace, we are about two weeks away from "Israel has a right to defend itself"

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well the fucker has already done an "I believe Israel has a right to exist!" i.e. "Its a good thing to ethnically cleanse and genocide Palestinians to steal their land!"

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (10 children)

That's a misrepresentation. He said it has a right to exist "as a state with equal rights," i.e. it has no right to do apartheid and genocide and the political project of ethnostates must be abolished.

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

i think it's pretty fair to mock him for breaking from the line. why do succs always try to redefine terms and make up new slogans like "humanitarian pauses" and "Israel has a right to exist as a non-apartheid state"? We already have debated this for decades, the international left has already come to a consensus that Israel has no right to exist. Why does he feel he's above the international line? That he's more "mature" and "pragmatic" than the "loony left" that he supposedly emerged from and that makes up his base? What gives him the right to play with slogans and water down principled positions for his own benefit?

Why does he get to ride high on "globalize the intifiada" and "defund the police" and "abolish ICE" and then once he's taken advantage of the leftists who believe in that and stepped on their shoulders, he gets to change it and back away from all of it? It's so obviously cowardice and opportunism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thawabit

These are the red lines. Mamdani plays with them like it's his to toy with. DNC focus groups running roughshod over millions of activists and martyrs

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Midnight_Pearl@hexbear.net 47 points 1 month ago (3 children)

you mean to tell me the guy who issued a personal apology to the NYPD for having called them racist once is a massive lib? shocked-pikachu

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (12 children)

See that one I can at least understand as “The NYPD murders people and I like being alive”

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

anybody in NYC municipal politics who isn't struggling against the NYPD isn't doing anything meaningful at all. That is their battle to fight, and Mamdani seems to not even want to engage and wants to surrender before he's even begun the struggle

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cuba and Venezuela are both legitimately more democratic than the USA.

Reason I hoped he might be different: looking at whom he upset (Zionists, landlords.

I thought surely someone who manages to get close to a correct stance on Palestine despite how overwhelming the propaganda is can see clearly and has his head screwed on straight when it comes to other countries.

I need a better litmus test and more and more it looks like that litmus test has to be: will they call themselves the C word and refuse to demonize any of the US's official enemies?

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the litmus test is ukraine. it's easy to be right on palestine. It's a lot more difficult to be right about Syria or Ukriane

and to clarify, because I know somebody in bad faith is gonna come in here and give the 'muh optics' argument - I'm not saying they have to be pro-russia or have been pro-assad. They just need to oppose arming and funding Ukraine and call for an end of the proxy war, and opposed funding and arming FSA/Al-Nusra/ISIS/Al Qaeda.

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

following Sanders position that Hugo Chavez was just another Communist dictator, just another Amerikkkan SucDem.

edit: I haven't followed this guy much (because I already got the feeling early that he was just another Sanders/AOC), he's DSA right? This is the same DSA that once sent a delegation to Cuba and instead of meeting the Cuban government and showing solidarity, they lectured Cuba about "DEMOCCRAACCCYYY". DSA sucks ass.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was a segment of the delegation that went rogue doing their shitlib theatrics while the majority of the delegation did actually meet with the government.

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (9 children)

yet they didn't punish, censure or remove those people from DSA iirc

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

I’ve worked with him for years both in DSA and on his campaigns and these topics have come up before, so it’s extra disappointing knowing that he doesn’t even personally believe this or the liberal Zionist shit he said about Palestine.

Like you just don’t have to answer those questions dawg, and they’ll have no relevance to you as a local politician (albeit a prominent one). Yeah, it’s the optics and the getting elected (which I still think would be an objectively a good thing) but why poison your project’s well when there are such easy ways to answer that by calling into question the American narrative? You are going to be attacked as a socialist no matter what you say man

[–] Comrade_Mushroom@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (45 children)

It's just validation that electoralism is pointless.

You can believe whatever going in, but as soon as you start to achieve meaningful success the system will force you to conform. "Change from within" is a fool's errand.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's just validation that electoralism is pointless.

There is a difference between the DSA's tactic of entryism into the Democratic Party as a method of reformism and participation in electoralism under the banner of a workers party practicing Democratic Centralism. They both might be participating in electoralism, but only the workers party is doing so to weaken support for the state and build support for a revolutionary movement.

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Important distinction that usually gets ignored by the pro-electoral crowd (actually the reform crowd)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
[–] LangleyDominos@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I have been pretty amicable to the DSA and Mamdani as an idea, but my off-ramp was like 2-3 "gaffs" ago. I don't think you people doing this kind of thing is as dire as others make it out to be. I do not think the current day US is anywhere close to 1903 Russia or 1848 Europe or even 1830s Europe. So whatever entryism or class collaboration you're going to do, at least be ready for stuff like this. I'm going to assume the DSA hasn't placed a giant ACME piano above Mamdani's head? So if he wins in a month and then lies about rent control, then what? If you're going to do reformism, you eventually should have a plan to enforce reforms.

When/if these other NY seats become available and this is tried again, have a plan to destroy these people if they suddenly become dishonest in the 11th hour. If people in the DSA aren't okay with that idea, then it's time for new members or a different org.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 0__0@hexbear.net 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I genuinely believe Tucker fucking Carlson would actually give a better answer that this. It's honestly mind numbing how leftists are just immune to learning from the right with regards to rhetoric. You know what Nick Fuentes says when they ask him about Hitler? "Uhmmm, he had some good ideas, but did you know Stalin and Mao killed a gazillion people, and are actually worse than him. Funny how the jew controlled mainstream media never talks about this smh."

Like, JUST DEFLECT THE QUESTION AND POINT TO AMERICAN CRIMES IN THE REGION. And unlike nazis, you would actually be correct in doing so, because they're literally the cause of the situation anyway!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MaghrebiLenin@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wow that's crazy. If only there was a long historical record of socdems using revolutionary language and aesthetics only to get into power and further reinforce capitalism. Since there isn't, I don't blame anyone who is shocked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CeliacMcCarthy@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago
[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Another stupid unforced error to appeal to people that had already made up their mind about him. New York City simply cannot have a meaningful number of Latinos who are so terrified by the spirit of Che Guevara that they demand this ridiculous purity test of their candidates, sincerely. I sort of doubt he personally believes this, but it's still a sign that he can't be ideologically strong on matters of u.s. jingoism, or can't realize the benefit of continuing to shut the fuck up.

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Someone who's read more than me can correct me if I'm mistaken, but I believe Lenin would refer to the sum total of this campaign as like a Bernsteinist opportunist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

in cuba you’re allowed to immediately vote any elected representative out who isnt serving their constituents.

in the US representatives arent even expected to serve their constituents. they’re just expected to make their donors happy and then the constituents who bare the brunt of this defend the representative with “at least its not a guy from the other party who has the same donors and would be doing the exact same stuff!!”

his succdem tendencies are no surprise, tho im not really sure what the point of being this much of a rube are. who are you expecting to win over? i dont think your average lib is all that invested in whether or not cuba or venezuela are dictatorships and his more left wing constituents dont wanna hear that bs. the only people that care about this are pundits who want a cheap gotcha, so why entertain them? if they ask what you think about those places, if you think supporting them is politically detrimental(which i dont believe it is personally) just say you’re getting elected to represent cuban and venezuelan new yorkers, not cubans and venezuelans in their respective home countries.

[–] ColonelKataffy@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago

kelly globalize the cringtifada

[–] heresiarch@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Following on from my previous comment in the other thread about this, I can now confirm this has miraculously not worsened DSA's standing with our allies in Cuba, whom our delegation is meeting in two weeks.

All glory to my comrades in DSA's international working group, and all glory to me as I once again morph into an NYC DSA hater I mean seriously the fuck are y'all doing just shut the fuck up

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pierre_delecto@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whhhhy would he even answer questions like this. He's running for mayor, seems like you could dismiss questions like this as irrelevant

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

you could, but why waste a golden opportunity to display to your new masters that you are part of the team and not a threat?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

hi I'm your host Tim Heidecker and you're watching On Socialism At The Socialism. I'm joined by my guest, socialism expert Gregg Turkington

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Let’s be realistic about Mamdani here, because a lot of people expressed their disappointment in him lately:

At this stage in his campaign, he must have realized that if elected, he will be facing a State government and legislature where the establishment Democrats have every incentives to see him fail.

He will be dealing with a hostile Federal government who can threaten to pull millions and millions of funding and grants on a whim.

He will have to face off a fascist police force, the most militarized in the world, who will be eager to send “warnings” to his family, friends and supporters about their safety.

He must have realized that he will be dealing with the business leaders, the landlord tycoons, the Wall Street bankers, the criminal underworld - all of whom have formed such deep corruption networks with the municipal bureaucracy that all of them are eyeing him as a fresh piece of meat, ready to be squeezed dry, ready to be beaten and tortured into submission.

I would not even be surprised that at this point, his campaign must have received “invitation letters” by many such groups hinting at what role he’s going to have to assume, or else the consequences and the obstructions he will be facing as a mayor.

He has to balance all these forces while keeping the city running. He has to make sure the public services are not disrupted, the public transportations will continue to run, the welfare programs can be adequately financed, the school system will have ample resources, and so on and so forth.

I believe Mamdani is an idealist. He was outraged by the injustices in the world. He wants to change the system. He still believes in democracy. He’s a socialist who probably likes based communist memes on the internet.

But at this point of the campaign, he must have realized that he’s alone in this. He may have supporters and volunteers, but how many of them are willing to take a bullet for him? How many of them are willing to rally behind him to fight the capitalist class to the end? How many of them are ideologically committed enough to sacrifice their own lives to fight for his cause?

Although he’s supported by the DSA, I strongly strongly doubt the DSA has vast infiltration network into the key municipal posts that could deliver Mamdani the results he will need as a mayor. If he does not have the control of the municipal administrative branches, he’s going to be blackmailed by them, or shall we say, the vested interests behind them.

In a way, I feel bad for him. For he has no idea the sick and the twisted of the monstrosity of a system he will be caught into. It must have dawned upon him that he will be facing - alone - a monstrosity that can no longer be reformed. A system that has rotten to the core. A system that has no redeeming value but to be torn down.

But maybe if he plays his role as intended, if he plays his cards right, if he pleases the right people, he could somehow succeed in making some incremental gains, a little bit of progress. That, in his mind, wouldn’t be a bad outcome at all. Perhaps.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago

Pretty much. If you read his history, he faced no real political opposition. His "opposition" amounts to facing a Democrat in a state assembly primary once. He didn't even run against a Republican. This is how un-battle-tested he is. We shouldn't be surprised someone who lived a comparatively sheltered life and who has never faced real adversity would completely capitulate and fold like a lawn chair at the first sign of struggle. With someone as wholly unprepared for facing real adversity as he is, it doesn't matter what he truly believes because he will not have the moral courage nor the tenacity of will nor the steadfastness to endure and overcome the forces that will do everything in their power to prevent what he wants from coming to fruition.

You don't need to read a single leftist text to know that people who have never been punched in the face completely crumble when they get punched in the face for the first time. "Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face." We're seeing him getting punched in the face and watching him crumble under the pressure in real time.

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean isn't this just another way to explain the failings of entryism in the electoral context? You're essentially manifesting support using an apparatus that has no desire for you and doesn't care for you and it either doesn't work at all, or if you co-opt it to some extent, you've now made enemies that see you fall in line and you've outpaced the militancy and support needed to prevent that.

It essentially leaves this type of campaign in the domain of opportunists and fools. Which I feel was already what was said about it repeatedly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago
[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

Fucking social democrats. They sucked in Lenin's time and they suck even worse now. He was right about them.

[–] PowerLurker@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yeah there goes my last lingering benefit of the doubt fell-for-it-again completely unforced error

join a revolutionary org if you can, and/or do your part to rebuild direct institutions of working class power (both in tandem would obviously be ideal!)

the answer to what our class has to do is hard and scary and a long road, but it hasn't changed and this dem entryism fantasy really needs to be put to bed.

[–] hedd616@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well... Why are people surprised at all? What is to be expected from a SucDem authorized by US Gov?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 month ago
[–] Des@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

there goes our third tier influences on his campaign

load more comments
view more: next ›