this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
476 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25696 readers
4586 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration has aggressively rolled back efforts across the federal government to combat human trafficking, a Guardian investigation has found.

The sweeping retreat threatens to negate decades of progress in the drive to prevent sexual slavery, forced labor and child sexual exploitation, according to legal experts, former government officials and anti-trafficking advocates. They say the administration’s moves are impeding efforts to prosecute perpetrators and protect survivors in the United States and around the world.

“It’s been a widespread and multi-pronged attack on survivors that leaves all of us less safe and leaves survivors with few options,” said Jean Bruggeman, executive director of Freedom Network USA, a national coalition of service providers, researchers and trafficking survivors.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Just preparing for after his presidency...

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Can't expect any different from an obvious PEDOPHILE

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Literally fucking campaigned on this shit. I'm so fucking disgusted people keep voting for a guy that just keeps pissing in their faces

If they're anything like their golden(-showering) god, they're into it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They are far too concerned with rolling back human rights, attacking their political enemies, various money-making schemes, "owning the libs", making everyone not a billionaire absolutely miserable, and of course, covering up for the pedo-in-chief.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago

Well of course he doesn't want any more of his buddies swept up and mysteriously suicided.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seriously, how many kids did he touch? This is getting ridiculous. It has been for sometime.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Underaged teen beauty pageants operated by Trump...

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is a long read, but worthwhile. The details are compelling. The administration has, unsurprisingly, tried to reframe the trafficking problem as one of immigration. This has allowed them to cut funding and staff, redirect resources, and ignore effective projects so they can bolster their deportation efforts. All of this is massively harmful to real victims and real solutions to human trafficking.

This is the definition of "when all you have is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail."

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

No, this is the definition of supporting pedophiles because that is what they do and that is who they are

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

This is the definition of "when all you have is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail."

No, this implies that there is a desire to fix anything in the first place

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This is the definition of "when all you have is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail."

This is actually the opposite. The only problem they give a shit about is nails, so they are breaking all their other tools by bashing them into the wall.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So where are the "kill your local pedophile" folks?

[–] RaoulDuke@anarchist.nexus 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A lot of those pedo hunters are in fact…pedos. They just project.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It’s the mythos of “white slavery.”

They want to protect children against swarthy foreigners, ala Taken. A white teenage girl married off to a white adult man is fine.

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Turns out they were just fascists who will say whatever they think will gain them the most power in any particular situation, and they never actually cared about anything but that power.

Now that going after pedophiles doesn't get them power, they don't care. But don't worry, they'll revive that rhetoric when they decide it's time to go after "groomers" (ie LGBTQ people)

Nooo. It was totally only Epstein. Nobody else wants to rape kids...

[–] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

hm i wonder why

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, hard working migrants. No. Child sex slaves. Yes?! Wtf.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

It makes sense when you realize they hate brown people and love raping children.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More children for him and his Gang Of Paedos to rape.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

... a gang-o-ped if you will (which you shouldn't!).

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

You see, nothing illegal happened on Trump-Epstein island. /s

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The fuck ...with all their save the children pearl clutching bullshit?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

They NEVER CARED ABOUT THE CHILDREN.

Everything they say is an excuse they think will be difficult to argue against, it they use it to dilute the very same accusations used against them.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"No one has ever been as hard as I am when it comes to exploitation, particularly, they say, the sexual exploitation of children. No one has ever been as hard. So we wiped it out. It's gone and it won't be ... there has never been anyone more dedicated to sexual exploitation is what they say."

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remove half of the context and it finally becomes accurate:

No one has ever been as hard as I am when it comes to exploitation, particularly, they say, the sexual exploitation of children. No one has ever been as hard.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

You don't really have to remove any context except understanding how stupid Trump is. If you just read that without knowing Trump it would be a confession

I originally explained it was gone so he was going to pull funding because it wasn't needed but the bit got too long so I snipped all that. It's painful to think in his voice for too long.

[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Even for a veteran trump-watcher sometimes we forget there's no bottom. It only ever gets worse.

Still - I thought I couldn't respect the Qanut/MAGA/"What-about-the-children" people any less. And here we are.

Don't want it to distract from more important things like identifying people who make fascists sad online or fabricating a case against an innocent Italian plumber.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

They would.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Well they are going to need a fresh supply of little ones, and it's not like they grow on trees, you know. Now that they control the government, they're in a sweet position to get new kids and make it legal to do whatever with them

Maybe this was the reason for trump to become president in the first place?