this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
395 points (97.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

9030 readers
2682 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

All billionaires are evil. All of them.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.org 7 points 2 hours ago

Taylor CO2 Swift

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Sounds like she worked so hard she would still be this popular even if she wasn't her daddies little "entertainment investment"

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I think @weeder is the new @dril since @dril isn't posting to bsky anymore

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

Hats off to Susan Sarandon for keeping the name of her first husband forever after their divorce.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Is this gal not aware that taking your husband's name is optional? Yeah, she's probably not gonna, but if she does, it's be disrepsectful NOT to call her by Kelce.

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

She can have a stage name be her maiden name. Not a big deal.

[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 35 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'd love to see Trav hyphenate and have Kelce‐Swift on his jersey. It would anger all the right people.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago

For maximum triggering he should put her name first, Swift-Kelce. Plus whenever commentators talk about him it'll always sound like they're complimenting his speed.

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 36 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I am so damn tired hearing about this stupid engagement. If the goal of this post is that we're going to talk sexism and feminism, the last way it should be done is through the lens of an out of touch idolized billionaire

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

T Swizzle is the American equivalent of a Royal now...

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

So that's why Trump is envious then

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 5 points 14 hours ago

Ok, her name is taylor.swift now.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

ill never understand how "married women are expected to change their name to their husband’s" is still a thing in the 21st century

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Let's trade. Women can keep their names when they let their sons keep their foreskins.

[–] enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Rest of the world: wat

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 hours ago

That's... a bizarre take on the situation.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 53 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

To me, the real issue is that the entire process is one giant double standard which is built on that expectation. At least it is in the US.

If a woman wants to change her last name to her husband's, it's fairly easy. She can just mail a form to the Social Security Administration and use her SS card to get a new photo ID.

If a man wants to change his last name to his wife's, he has to hire an attorney and get a court order.

[–] PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not to detract from your general point, but no, you don't need an attorney to change your name in (at least most of) the US, especially if you have a reason you can put on a simple court filing like "marriage". It is somewhat unnecessarily complicated by paperwork, but you definitely don't need a lawyer and it isn't recommended to pay for one for something so simple.

I know this because I'm transgender and have changed my entire name, and looked up the process in multiple states.

You had to do it in multiple states? Or was it a One State to Rule them All situation? Serious question, by the way.

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 41 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I guess this is the US of A? Here in a northern European country you get the option when you marry to keep your names, combine both, only keep the husband's or only keep the wife's.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

In Spain, since the 16th century, the wife keeps her last name, and father and mother last names are used, the order of which can be changed.

Also, after your 18th birthday you can change it to whichever order you want.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I've wondered, though, what happens when the kid gets married and has a kid?

When Juan Acevedo-Rodriguez marries Mariana Cortez-Garza, what is their kid's last name?

Edit: disregard, I should have kept scrolling, someone already answered my question.

Now that's the way to do it.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 20 hours ago

It’s even worse in Japan, where married women are legally required to take their husband’s name. (There is mounting pressure to reform this, though the conservative ruling party is dragging its feet.)

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

It’s easier that everyone in the family has the same surname imo

So the kids get double surnames?

Do their kids get quadruple surnames? Where does it end?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Couples I've known who both had double-barrelled surnames before marriage generally combined one of the names from each of their names to create a new double-barrelled name, which is what their new family and kids use. E.g. A-B marries X-Y and they become B-Y or X-A or whatever.

Sometimes, the missing parts of the surname get given to specific children as middle names. Which is a nice way of acknowledging older family members without burdening your kid with an old or boring name.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The legal use is 2 surnames, father mother, people can often recite combinations to several generations back, but that is really ancdotic, although it makes genealogy pretty straight forward

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Right... As long as people were faithful (90%)

[–] krull_krull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

Here, there is no surname. every name is a given name. Yes, even something like Abdul Juan Michael Obama Pierre can be a full given name of one guy.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The Spanish system is superior:
FirstName(s) Parent1LastName Parent2LastName

To clarify it's the first last name of both parents, and you can choose the order with the condition all children of same parents must have the same order.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Just pushes the issue down one generation…

[–] callyral@pawb.social 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Parent1 B C, Parent2 J K

Makes Child1 C K

(or Child1 K C)

...

Parent3 B A, Parent4 J H

Makes Child2 A H

(or Child2 H A)

...

Child1 and Child2 become Parent5 and Parent6

Parent5 C K, Parent6 A H

Child3 K H

(or Child3 H K)

...

it seems to work pretty well (ends up preferring people with two surnames, which is an ok amount of surnames)

[–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

flamingo said, a couple comments up, that it's the first last name of both parents. So Child1 should be B J or J B, Child2 should be the same and Child3 should hence be B B, B J, J B, or J J depending on what 1 and 2 chose. Right?

[–] copd@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

The whole system collapses if you have a child with someone who has "chosen" a different family surname order.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

where I live, kids still usually take on their father’s name (sometimes the names are combined), but the mother almost never takes on her husband’s name. so yes, usually the mother will be an outlier in her family, last name wise.

i don’t think mothers were i live are less connected to their family because of it, tho

(altho, personally, i still don’t like the fact that it’s expected for kids to take on their father’s name, it feels like a relic of a shitty system better left in the past)

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with the fact that it's easier for everyone to share the same name, especially when one parent travels alone with the kids. It's such a faff (with good reasons) if you don't have the same.

The issue is more that it's often assumed that the wife has to take the husband's name by default, rather than it being ultimately a choice between the couple.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Well wouldn’t mind if it was the other way around, but I appreciate that there is a rule, so no one gets offended when you ditch a generational name.

[–] Mmagnusson@programming.dev 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Icelandic patronyms like to have a word. You can have a 4 person family and nobody has the same "last name"

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 20 hours ago

Which, like most Icelandic peculiarities, is adorable, but doesn’t scale well, especially with the pool of available names being restricted by the Naming Committee (in Iceland, it is illegal to give a child a name that is not on a list of approved names). With under 400,000 people in the country, and almost no family names, Icelandic phone directories apparently list people’s nicknames as well, so you don’t call the wrong Gunnlaugur Þóraresson by mistake.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

I agree it's so much eeasier. It's kinda weird how much stuff gets easier when you just say "that's my wife/husband". It magically erodes a lot of barriers. People rarely check, but if they do they seem to only go as far as making sure the last names match.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Wellcome to the Spaniard custom, probably older than your country 🫠

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

16th century.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Eh weird dig considering a lot of other European countries do it that way. It's not just the US or Canada.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

It's not really a dig on the age and the custom of the US, but a dig on the incredulity with which the system that has been in place for tons of generations in Spain was presented by the commenter. Let me rephrase it, "the custom is older than the US, don't talk about it as if it were an alien concept".

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

It makes my work maintaining computer systems a nightmare. Mary Smith changing to Mary Taylor makes my job harder. At least on these CoTS systems, and without notice.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 16 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

dril has been posting a ton on Bluesky for as long as I’ve been on there (eight months?)

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 20 hours ago

Has he enabled Bridgy Fed?

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

I hope so. He's hopefully even stronger now due to the black mold.