That's when you kill them with magnets /s
HK65
joined 2 years ago
My hero
Nah, these aren't assassinations, just plain domestic murders.
Where is the video
I'll be honest, I feel this meme better describes neolib politicians here in Europe.
Can't upvite this enough. I'm not really vegetarian, but I love the fact that it is gaining traction, since it's just so much better food. If there is a vegan option of anything, I'll go for that.
The best burger I've ever eaten had a giant mushroom as the main thing in it, sterotypically served by a trans girl at a street food vendor in the gay quarter of Amsterdam.
It literally ruined burgers for me, I'm still chasing that high. I think if you want to be a vegan activist, learn to cook well and open a restaurant. That's how they got me.
Screens are measured in inches
Your 401k plans are balls deep in AI money.
Guess who'll hold the bags when the bubble pops.
That needs a manager who has the slightest idea about what you're doing.
At least in Europe, I haven't seen any with audio
Sacrifices have to be made for a better world
Hey, these photos were taken in Hungary today, aerial refueling of F/A-18E Super Hornets as seen from the ground.
And here are some extra courtesy of the same guy, from his friend who works as a refueling tech.
333
Hungary opposition figures urge Democrats to organize against autocratic takeover by Trump
(www.theguardian.com)
14
So creating a new repo on GitHub, you get a set of getting started steps. They changed the default branchname to "main" from "master" due to its connotations with slavery.
When I create a new repo now, the initial getting started steps recommend creating a branch named "master" as opposed to "main" as it was a while ago.
It's especially weird since the line git branch -M master is completely unnecessary, since git init still sets you up with a "master" branch.
Disclaimer: I have a bunch of private repos, and my default branchnames are pretty much all "master".
Is this a recent change?
Edit: Mystery solved, my default branchname is "master". Thanks bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone !
view more: next ›
In a competitive market, companies on the supply side are price accepting, like people on the demand side. Gaming in general is relatively competitive.
If a company can sell a game for 60 EUR, they won't sell it cheaper. If they can't make it for that cost, they won't sell it for more, they just won't make it.
Costs of producing the game generally have no direct impact on the market price.