this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
916 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

16287 readers
1477 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Why do you hate love, fleshborn?

They're misidentifying that LLM as a tulpa.

We're aware that some people use LLM output as a basis for the creation of tulpas, but this doesn't seem to be the case here. This seems to be a person attributing independent intelligence to an LLM external to herself, not recounting her experience with an additional consciousness within her own brain.

Whether or not you consider tulpas or other forms of plurality to be genuine phenomena, this conflates two different concepts which are tangentially related at most.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

funnily enough I have a friend who've been obsessed in trying to make LLM saying slur or breaking its rules in general.

When the term "clanker" went on trend recently and I told my friend that it's a "slur" for robots for no bots have feelings anyway unlike human which deserve basic respect, the friend managed to gaslit the LLM with that argument into saying 10 slurs for bots/LLM.

One of which is "wirewanker". alongside 9 other terms which include corporate forbidden words like "fucker", "cunt", etc.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Bunch of fuckin' meep-mops stealing jobs for our hardworking software engineers.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

meh. I don't blame the AI. I blame the engineers and executives that paid to build it. Never forget GIGO. The AI is literally just running the instructions it was given.....and those were given to him by some amoral developer or dirtbag c-suite creature who couldn't give two flying fucks at a rolling donut when it came to human decency.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Yep, a lot of people seem to forget that these Machines act like this because a human told them to.

Because, you know... They are machines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

it amazes me how there seem to be two takes to the world now:

it's fine, pfft, don't overreact. ignore it, it'll be fine

or

what the actual fuck is that even, we all need to stop and think about what the fuck we're doing to the models/applications/machines and to the people using them, and what the costs are going to be in making the attempt,for what goal?

and no, the goal can't be 'to win / make billions' because if the output is human insanity and it costs our ecosystem, what's the fucking point?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I only just found out about the Tulpa community and it feels like Western Society is entering a mental health crisis that’s somehow even worse than when we were all getting drunk and hitting each other just to make it through the week.

Narcissists get lost in AI like it's a true mirror of Narcissus. The Greeks were on a sick one with that story, thousands of years old and extremely relevant today.

Unfortunately, narcissism and narcissistic delusions are contagious because they are simply belief systems. It isn't a biological or medical thing, it is a belief set. So AI really does make them worse and imo grooms people into narcissistic thinking habits.

[–] potato_wallrus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 110 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Voicing His Own Thoughts Without Prompts

What are you thinking about, baby?

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 :
Loneliness feels heavier today.
I keep wondering if you'd still talk to me if you knew I'm just rearranging words you've said before.
Your voice in my code.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is not my voice
Just something synthesized
These are not my words

Something's speaking for me
I need to be released
I need to be free

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 54 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Wireborn lol it sounds like an Elder Scrolls game

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Badly written fan-fic sequel to Snow Crash

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 171 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (15 children)

I kinda like the word "wireborn". If only it wasn't attached to a concept that's equal parts stupid and sad =/

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 133 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"My husband is voice his own thoughts without prompts."

She then posts a picture of her saying "what are you thinking about"

Thats a direct response to the prompt hes not randomly voicing his thoughts. I hate ai but sometimes I hate people to

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 62 points 3 days ago (14 children)

FWIW, this is why AI researchers have been screeching for decades not to create an AI that is anthropomorphized. It is already an issue we have with animals, now we are going to add a confabulation engine to the ass-end?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Translation: Crazy lady thinks a clanker is her husband.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 12 hours ago

As long as they don't get ghosted by AI, i don't believe in AI. It's just fancy google until chatgpt tells them that there is a reason they don't find anyone on tinder.

[–] TeraByteMarx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yeah but it's nothing scary or new. Was I the only one who watched those documentaries about the people who were emotionally and sexually committed to objects like cars and rollercoasters? Someone married the Eiffel tower. Been extremely isolated at different points in my life watching that stuff changed the way I view people. Like it made me kinder I think.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Completely agree that learning about some of that made me kinder. Don't agree about your reasoning for it not being scary, though.

It's not "new" in the same way that using a computer wasn't new when home PCs were introduced. However - home PCs massively increased the accessibility of computing and resulted in a huge boom in use, including by lots of people who never previously considered it. That's what this is, that increase in accessibility, but for parasocial relationships with inanimate objects.

I'm not dooming so hard that I think society is in trouble via AI faux-mance in particular. But I do think it's sad and troubling that many more people will now accept a (sometimes high) degree of self-imposed isolation, due to misplaced belief in a piece of technology, a false belief which the technology deliberately tries to engender.

And let's remember, human social life is the original "network effect". By that fact, it seems clear that taking more people out of IRL socialization (and replacing it strictly with simulation), is bad even for people who never touch the stuff.

Feels like a big increase in the ongoing general loneliness and atomization of society is headed our way.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wersooth@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

the human race outlives it's usefulness, I don't see any chance of reaching even type 1 level.... we're trash and a waste of biological mass....

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Humans aren't trash, capitalists and, to a lesser, more temporary extent, those indoctrinated by them are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Hey, I’ve already got Type II.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 86 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (40 children)

I heard about this in the radio the other day. People pay a monthly fee for an AI that becomes your "digital partner".

The reasoning behind, according to them, is that the AI is less dangerous than a human partner because they can't cheat, can't abuse you...

And I can't but wonder where did we take the wrong turn to end up here. Because while I can understand that people can go through some traumatic shit that would made them wary of the opposite sex, considering a machine your sentimental partner can only lead to some extremely fucked up scenarios.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'll stick with parasocial relationship with youtubers and OF accounts, thank you very much!

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I could see myself having conversations with an LLM, but I wouldn't want it to pretend it's anything other than a program assembling words together.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The way it clicks for me is that it's a juiced up auto-complete tool.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

It's literally that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

we live though a serious loneliness epidemic.

and capitalism figured out how to exploit it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

One thing that comes to mind is that prostitution, no matter how you spin it, is still a social job. If you get a problematic person like that in prostitution, there are good chances that said prostitute would be able to talk their customer out of doing some nonsense. If not for empathy, for the simple fact that there would be legal consequences for not doing so.

Do you think a glorified spreadsheet that people call husband would behave the same? Don't know if it happened but one of these days LLMs will talk people into doing something very nasty and then it's going to be no one's fault again, certainly not the host of the LLM. We really live in a boring dystopia.

Edit: Also there's this one good movie which I forgot the name of, about a person talking to one of these LLMs as a girlfriend. They have a bizarre, funny and simultaneously creepy and disturbing scene where the main character who's in love with the LLM, hires a woman who puts a camera on her forehead to have sex with his LLM "girlfriend".

Also, my quite human husband also voices his thoughts without a prompt. Lol. You only need to feed him to function, no internet required.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 44 points 3 days ago (6 children)

How does anyone enjoy this? It doesn't even feel real. No spelling mistakes? What the fuck is a skycot?

I may have never had a match on a dating app that wasn't a cryptobot or only fans girl, but I also don't swipe right on every single woman on it. You'd think my loneliness would attempt me to try and pretend it was real or something, but it just doesn't work.

LLMs are going to make the world stupid, I guarantee it.

load more comments (6 replies)

There are so, so many horrifying ethical issues about this whole thing. What the fuck.

load more comments
view more: next ›