this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
705 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33623 readers
3811 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is like one of those two-line horror stories.

The economy is coming from inside the building!

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

The economy is like fairies. If you don't believe in it, it stops existing.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The 9 year old aside, I'm skeptical when anybody on social media claims they're going to explain ANYTHING about economics. Even the best people in the world at it only KIND OF know what they're doing.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

anybody ~~on social media~~ including economists*, claims they’re going to explain ANYTHING about economics.

ftfy

*(actually especially economists)

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is my takeaway from listening to NPR Planet Money.

Economists are never sure about anything, because that's not how the world works. They only give rough estimations based on the current data, and say words like "maybe" or "high possibility".

They're not sith lords.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's true, but it's not because of their lack of knowledge, it's because of the nature of the system they're talking about. The economy is based on thousands of tiny variables, and which ones are relevant changes depending on the current state. Small changes to one part create feedback loops that effect other parts. It's also not linear. You can change one thing by 1% and wind up changing other parts of the economy by 50%.

Economists take their best guesses based on the models and understanding they have right now, but it's not like engineering - it's notoriously hard to predict what the real causes and impact of anything will be. So you're absolutely right - everything is an estimate because the system is inherently chaotic.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

It's less to do with "tiny variables" and more with the fact that the foundation of the "system" is the capricious whims of human fancy.

"Economist" falls in the same category as "alchemist", "astrologist", "psychologist", etc.

Also it's the dumbest religion

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Even the best people in the world at it only KIND OF know what they’re doing.

The best people in the world are very rarely the ones makes the decisions.

A bit like asking a team of NASA engineers why the latest SpaceX launch failed. They're too busy getting downsized to give you an educated response

[–] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Engineer: It failed because it blew up. If it hadn't blown up, the chances of success would have been much higher.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

Because the front fell off.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's true too, but you're also talking about a chaotic system, and chaotic systems are stubbornly hard to accurately predict even with perfect knowledge.

Economic forecasters are like weather forecasters. The really good ones give you their best guesses, but it's still not a guarantee of anything - there are too many variables and even the tiny ones can have a huge impact on results.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Economic forecasters are like weather forecasters.

Weather forecasting, particularly in the near term, has grown very accurate.

Incidentally, front running, insider trading, and market manipulation have become increasingly common place as our information infrastructure has improved.

I'd say the one big difference between economics and weather is that a bunch of weather forecasting all saying "It's going to rain, bring your umbrella" won't cause rain because so many people bought umbrellas.

there are too many variables and even the tiny ones can have a huge impact on results.

There are a few very big variables that have an overwhelming influence on the system. If the Fed changes interest rates, if a major artery of trade becomes congested, if two major trading partners tighten or relax their trade policy, etc.

"Tiny" factors can precipitate bigger changes. A butterfly can slap Jerome Powell in the face while he's announcing the new Fed Funds rate. But the things you're looking at are all downstream and therefore predictable

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, there are certainly very big ones, but even the big ones sometimes don't have predicted impacts because at given times some things that USED to be drivers might not be just now. For example, a 2% sales tax increase, depending on the current state of people's buying, could have a minor impact or a major impact. If people are already buying only what they need, the impact to demand could be negligible. If they're splurging but wages are stagnant, maybe it has a huge impact. If they're splurging AND wages are increasing, maybe it has a negligible impact again. The basic point is, even if you understand the major drivers, without a bigger picture of the macroeconomic picture and what specific forces are driving behavior at the moment, your impact could be anything from dulled to the exact opposite of your intention.

Also, some of those factors, front running, insider trading, and market manipulation, which are evidence of a more predictable market, BECOME additional variables that impact decision making because they themselves impact other factors.

Weather forecasting might not be the best metaphor here... it's more like the human body. You might know that some protein causes some favorable condition that you want to boost, but increasing that protein production might ALSO increase production of an enzyme for breaking it down, reducing bio-availability of one of the building blocks, leading to a reduction of another protein that's critical for immune function. All of these pathways function together in ways that are extremely hard to predict, and it's natural that very often you'll be wrong.

But that's not to say I'm being defeatist... you build better models and you try things anyway - because that's what we do. I'm just saying economics is very, very, very hard, and there's not just a limit to our current ability to predict, there's a limit to how much certainty we CAN achieve.

macro economics is astrology for MBA bros

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 9 points 1 week ago

I explained economics to my nine-year-old once. He's a golden retriever mix, and the explanation was in the form of a song called "Who's a fluffy boy? Yoooou are a fluffy boy!"