They either fail to realize that the avatar is to maintain anonymity, while giving people a personable figure to watch, or they are just one of those people who don't like it due to personal preferences, and want to sound like they have a better reason than that.

Points out where working with me give no security guarantees, that they accept when agreeing to allow me to hack them, either in person, writing, or electronic communications, along with allowing the terms to change at any time, for any reason, without notice.

According to a lot of people? No.

I mean, it is just sponge cake, from what I have looked at people generally didn't just eat them this plain. They added sesame seeds/oil, dip them into tea, add various types of creams, honey, etc.

maybe crab cakes?

looks good

From the thumb nail it looked like someone holing a tiny little cupcake

If by stunt you mean, "discusses how the character has been set-up as the natural replacement with games media interviewer"... then sure, stunt.

I know from experience some mods don't see the difference. Which is why I asked.

Would discussion of the break down of the efficacy of civil venues for change, leading to this kind of violence, as an outcome of their own actions, be acceptable?

I think you misinterpreted the intent of my comment. I was saying that everyone being some form of fag is a 4chanism, and wondered if the person replied to was familiar with 4chan, because the reason for the term is basically something you can't have gone on 4chan and not seen.

Just make a hovering AWACS that can hold U2 elevation. Then the gunship could hit targets across the pacific.

Everyone on 4chan is some xfag

Honest question, are you familiar with 4chan at all?