this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
813 points (95.0% liked)

Science Memes

16212 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 296 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Fake and gay.

No way the engineer corrects the mathematician for using j instead of i.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 month ago (7 children)

As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren't even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 46 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

0 1 10

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thomasloven@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hoimo@ani.social 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How do we know it's gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 59 points 1 month ago

Because it's 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago

Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

Newfag.

(sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 20 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

The mathematician also used "operative" instead of, uh, something else, and "associative" instead of "commutative"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Right? They got that shit backwards. Op is a fraud. i is used in pure math, j is used in engineering.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago

My thoughts exactly lol

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 156 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I'm EE gang, and all my homies use j.

[–] GandalfTheDumb@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I've never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago

Pikachu engineer

That's a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fun starts when you study quaternions

i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

(...I think you may have gotten whooshed...)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It gets worse actually. You can define a number system using any power of 2 amount of i-like units in a similar relationship to quaternions using the Cayley-Dickson construction

Fascinatingly, you lose some property of the algebra at each step. Quaternions aren't commutative: ABC != CBA. Octonians aren't associative: (AB)C != A(BC). Once you get into 16 i's with subscripts, it really gets crazy.

(Also, I just got the joke. Damnit @HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone your serious answer threw me off!)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I agree. Clearly i is current. What is this i=√-1 nonsense.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 month ago

[Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Well done, truly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 80 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is anyone doing anything tonight?

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

no, d..do you have a plan?

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago

Something something distance calls for norm, not just squares.

||i||² + ||1||² = 2

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago

I’m a mechanical engineering student with a math minor and I’m a switch so yeah, I’d take either side of this

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 57 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (8 children)

operative?

Also mathematicians use i for imaginary, engineers use j. The story does not add up. I have never seen a single mathematician use j for imaginary.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 47 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Me, a language/arts person: "Huh?"

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 21 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 31 points 4 weeks ago

I have no idea what they're talking about, but I do love a happy ending.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 30 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As a physicist I can't understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don't fuck

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

As a software dude I can see you wrote a regex, I just can't find out what you're trying to match.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Better plot than 50 Shades of Grey

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] laserm@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Why would a mathematician use j for imaginary numbers and why would engineer be mad at them?

[–] CyanideShotInjection@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The only thing I can think of is that the OP studied electrical engineering at some point. But it's a 4chan story so probably fake anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 25 points 1 month ago

Relationship goals

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago

They both bottoms.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If not fraction, why fraction shaped?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 22 points 4 weeks ago

I believe the correct terminology is denominator mathematician.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

$\int dx f(x)$ is standard notation for physicists

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 weeks ago

I love how that wannabe 4chan nerd just got outnerded in the comment section

load more comments
view more: next ›