_g_be

Yeah it's hard to tell which way it'll go, some features get gated away as an incentive to upgrade

The pixel line has had dedicated AI chip/functionality for several generations

Oh so 'NUT' is not work appropriate language? Take it up with the author of NAT and with linguists

Wait fuck this is true haha

This is a good point, I didn't read it that way initially

My bad, it's my fault for having eyes to read this

Cross-questioning Gemini about what it created also yielded typical AI responses. However, on questioning further, it seemed to better understand that it had created something unnerving and creepy.

Why would interrogating it yield any truth? It can't explain it's 'reasoning' because it didn't, it generated. And it'll generate responses to your questions.

"Why did you make creepy image?" "I didn't" "yeah you did" "your 100% right to pushback, I guess I did"

This guy likes Uppies

Wait yeah this is a shitpost. Nvm, carry on, and go fuck yourself 😇

They didn't say they did. I didn't read it as justifying other people driving slow in the lane, but rather criticizing the aggressive drivers

Bluetooth mouse+keyboard or keyboard with integrated track pad. When you remove that as a requirement now you just need 4k120 video with passthru charging, which should be easier to find

Oops didn't read the full comment.

I still think there's more reusability with bluetooth peripherals than there would be with specific video cables

intentionally misleading

I didn't suggest you did it intentionally.

I am suggesting that you are being challenged by others because your sentence as written and without the context of the other comments is incorrect, whether intentionally or unintentionally.