_g_be

Too true

They love to syphon up all the data for 'training' so it could be argued that it's mutually beneficial... but it's comparable to that zombie virus/fungus that infects and takes over the caterpillar

I agree with your view but I also wonder if it's misguided. If we were to use it as a tool, but the tool was made of parts that are immoral does that taint everything about it? I use a phone and a calculator, both are made with metals that are mined in dangerous conditions by exploited laborers. A pixel phone and Gemini AI are both products of google, wouldn't either be enough to discredit a user?

There's no ethical consumption under capitalism (derogatory)

Report the misbehaving machine spirit to the omnissiah

It's great! Except for the several teen suicides

cluster of fringe communities

I was already sold on it, you don't have to keep buttering me up on the idea.

When everything is so searchable and indexable, obscurity is almost a feature

LLM the technology is interesting and impressive. the way companies are shoving it into everything and trying to sell it as a replacement for employees is awful. The way the AI companies are behaving is awful.

They did express their displeasure. Even said please

Crazy if they publicize csam with no consequence

Looking like they came off the set of Top Gun

Convertico as a website has existed long before AI.

Just because PNG to jpeg XL is inefficient doesn't mean it's AI.

If it's "not strictly defined" and used when it's convenient, then it's meaningless.

If the term is meaningless or counter-intuitive jargon, then it shouldn't be included in a headline.

If openAI has an "unproven business model" they're not a startup they're a failed business living off of borrowed and leveraged assets.