this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
1086 points (96.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8370 readers
2788 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck is a 17 year old doing at a job?

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

at my old job the youngest employees were like 15. not too uncommon in some parts of America

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Shouldn't it be uncommon? Or better yet, non existing?

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I am forklift certified. I do not need this.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I'd hate to be the one to say this, but that's not what people mean by "picking up girls."

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's a concept: women over 29 years old don't view Tinder as a good option for finding decent men. Therefore only the most desperate are the ones who sign up to display themselves on the digital meat market.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think we should make dating apps even worse, and just let humanity die out naturally.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

I don't know how you would go about intentionally making them worse. In theory they have a premium mode but in practise the premium mode is the "function at all" mode.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I bet that the Pandas would step in and keep us going.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

oh dont worry. The right wingers will murder us all soon.

[–] NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Schopenhauer did say as much I suppose. Except for the Tinder bit. Now to pin him as a millennial or a Gen Z...

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I’ve been curious if a government-run dating app could do better - if its goal is to achieve genuine engagement, not cycles of frustration that boost subscription rates.

This is one of many subjects where capitalist concern ruins the product (and that’s not even something I say as often as others on Lenny)

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

National Lampoon had an article once called 'Girls of the Soviet Block'. When you said government run dating app, it made me think how hilarious that turned out.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Honestly, 90% of the need for dating apps would vanish if people had more free time away from work and well-kept public spaces for entertainment that didn't expect you to purchase anything.

So rather than a government-run dating app, how about a government-sanctioned 4 day work week and well kept public parks?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yet again, low-density exclusionary zoning causing car-dependency (which is why the "third spaces" you're talking about have all-but disappeared) is revealed as the root cause of almost every problem we have.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t know if I buy that. I think people simply like hiding behind a screen for many interactions these days - including dating.

Not that Im against your idea but maybe just the 90% part seems inflated.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perhaps, but we would need to put the idea in practice to determine what's the cause/effect relationship here.

Are people more addicted to their screens because the real world became hostile, or is the real world becoming hostile because people are glued to their screens?

I'd bet on the first option, but I could be wrong.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 21 hours ago

Real relationships require a vulnerability that dating apps can not provide

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I love my screen time but if there was free ping pong somewhere outside or something I'd go there a lot. Same for rock climbing, board game spaces... I'd get out for a lot. Screen time is a cheap substitute for this real stuff.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But who makes the profit in your silly goose scenario? Somebody has to be making money or it's a terrible idea!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said capitalism and summoned your resident anticapitalist. How can I be of assistance, comrade. :D

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looking for an anticapitalist on lemmy is like looking for a lesbian at a Teagan and Sara concert. It's not everybody, but it's not a difficult search

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 14 hours ago

meh, I dont think thats accurate. I would say "opportunist" is a better fit. Anticapitalists understand how profit extractions works and have a very different view on society. Mostly one that does not work on .world because of the capitalist propaganda machine running in the west.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I run a social club for gay men, and we've talked about coming up with an app that's run by a non-profit, with social workers on the board, that's designed to actually connect people, not keep them glued to the app. Friendship, dates, activity partners, whatever.

I don't know why no one has come up with the non-profit model here but if I can get enough steam, we're doing it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ExtraordinaryJoe@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (10 children)

In my 50s and I don't bother anymore. It's just not worth the hassle. In my 30s I would have had to send out 100 messages to get 1 date. It's so much worse in my 50s.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›