this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
992 points (98.8% liked)

memes

16070 readers
2802 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago

She didnt sign up for some random human, if she wanted that she could have had Gaston.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't peg Belle for being a gold digger though.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago

Books were a luxury

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe it's a similar situation like here (oglaf nsfw comic):
https://www.oglaf.com/herp/

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She was probably pretty disappointed, too. Ew!

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

He was better as the beast.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 110 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I'm no Disney expert but Belle is the only worthy Princess of the bunch

She wanted to pursue knowledge, not a boy or just fun; she dropped everything to save her dad instead of causing his death or dethronement; she was fully aware how disgusting Gaston was regardless of appearance; she was seduced by books not riches; and yes, she was ready to ride the beast

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And then she founded the company "Bad Dragon"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To me I felt like Belle had Stockholm syndrome

[–] Twipped@l.twipped.social 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Stockholm Syndrome isn’t an actual thing, fyi. It has never been recognized as a condition and never been diagnosed. The entire thing was an attempt to dismiss valid reactions to police incompetence.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Controversy and debate about whether the condition exists for literal hostages in a violent/deadly situation is a step removed from talking about whether people become irrationally attached to manipulative romantic/sexual partners, and stay despite all rationality pointing towards leaving.

I don't know if Stockholm Syndrome exists for hostages held at gunpoint. But I do know that plenty of people have behaved irrationally about attachment to abusive people in their lives. And we don't have to call that particular condition Stockholm Syndrome, but your argument doesn't really disprove the topic of this discussion.

your argument doesn't really disprove the topic of this discussion.

Topic of Discussion

I don't know if Stockholm Syndrome exists for hostages held at gunpoint.

Stockholm syndrome doesn't require being held at gun point.

The real issue is people behaving irrationally according to you. If you were in this situation, you would done the rational thing. Therefore, they must be irrational. They are, I'm part, to blame for their situation.

But this is all predicted on your value system and not theirs. Stockholm syndrome doesn't take into account their story and what convinced them to behave the way they did. It a heavy hand that decontextualizes events and removes victims agency. Accounting for these may still reveal something worth addressing for a smaller subset of victims who are trauma bonded, but it should patiently and diligently center and empower the voices of victims and not dismiss them as irrational

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Belle and the beast never really existed either so maybe she did have it!

[–] miridius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Wow what a read! TIL. Thank you for this

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he's verbally abusive, violent, and keeps you locked up as a prisoner, he isn't necessarily evil.

You can change him! Just be patient, accept him, and love him!

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like the take in Phantom of the Opera better here. At first you expect it to be a beauty and the beast romantic story but Christine rejects the phantom not because of his appearance but because his soul is just as ugly as his exterior.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

??? Isn't that the whole point of the story ? How is that a fun fact?

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago

TFW no filthy rich furry bf

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not a fun fact, that is the entier story...

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

And like a million Rule 34's

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 205 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Just like how Shek didn't know that Fiona would turn into a SBBW ogre. He was prepared to wear an angry skinny white girl like a condom

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago

I didn't need that mental image. But since you have installed it in my head, I am honor-bound to upvote.

sigh

[–] errer@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Cue the Hulk/Black Widow GIF

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Shrek 2 takes it further with Fiona actively choosing to let the magic wear off so her boy toy would turn back into an ogre rather than settle for a twunk rest of her life.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I wouldn't blame Belle if she was disappointed and called it off.

Tales can be cruel:

And people underestimate big dommy furries:

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This comic is neither left-right or right-left orientation and that should be punishable by death.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk man. When I read it it only makes sense left-right.

[–] Nelots@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago

It's meant to be read upper left, bottom left, upper right, bottom right. So I guess that is technically still read left-right.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I guess that seam in the middle means it's originally two pages.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago

Hey, no one said it was anything more than romantic. You don't have to fuck anything that moves.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can't be the only one who was disappointed when the beast turned into generic inbred royal twink?

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not a real man like Gaston

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 96 points 2 days ago (10 children)

That’s like, the moral of the whole movie is that she didn’t judge him for his appearance and wasn’t expecting a prince. I figured this was well known.

[–] vrojak@feddit.org 52 points 2 days ago (6 children)

That's the interpretation from the modern perspective on relationships. The tale is from a time where women (well, more like girls to be exact) were married off without any say of their own, and the tale was supposed to tell them "hey, we know the guy we're forcing you to marry seems like a hairy monster, buuuuut if you can look past that he might be nice actually!"

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Part4@infosec.pub 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Presumably she wasn't just prepared to ride the beast, she actively wanted to be ruined by it.

She was probably disappointed when the transition happened. She thought she was going to be raw-dogged by the monster.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Jerk off before you write your comment next time.

[–] DeviantOvary@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Look, some of us are monster fuckers and you'll have to deal with it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can't find another source for this tweet from either Twitter or Reddit, but here's a screenshot of this tweet by Twitter user @hiimbobbi:

Personally, Belle was not fooling me or anyone. When the Beast changed into a human, I saw that look on her face. That was DISAPPOINTMENT.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›