GaMEChld

Yeah I like at least a year, but multi year is ideal

I assumed this was more a sloppy jab at discovering your partner was more promiscuous than you envisioned rather than size envy. Not that that would be logically consistent either. All in all, meh tier meme.

Guess we'll just die I guess. Shall I start making nooses for us?

This is exactly what Grand Juries are for and why the bar for indictment is so low.

It's a safeguard to prevent frivolous felony persecution by the State upon individuals.

It is to the Jurors to take one look at the evidence the prosecution presents and to say, nope, this is a BS case.

That's why it's so easy to get indictments. Generally, prosecutors only show up with actual evidence of potential wrong doing.

If they show up with nothing, in typical Trump legal team fashion, they will get no indictment.

They seem to think because THEY suck at law, everyone else does too. All competent lawyers left that administration. Believe it or not, plenty of lawyers actually have respect for the institutions they spent their lives training in and working in.

But not really a NEW problem. We knew LLM's are trained on aggregate human data. We know aggregate human data is fundamentally flawed, inconsistent, unreliable, etc.

Like was there a point at which people just decided, nah AI is just plain accurate? Or is that just what morons always thought despite the permanent warnings plastered everywhere saying THIS AI CAN MAKE MISTAKES, CHECK EVERYTHING!

Yeah, I just lean into it. Try and count lol! Or maybe it could be turned into a drinking game!

I don't see this as a problem, rather, an opportunity to study information & disinformation propogation.

Love the vibe, but not making enough bad decisions to be truly Janeway.

Yeah, he's another good example. Funny thing is he and Lisa are related. That's a hell of a legacy cooking in that family tree.

I'm not necessarily saying they need to be ABLE to do all the jobs, but I think it's probably a good recipe for success for the CEO to understand the importance of each role in a company. And that said, an Engineer type CEO is probably a boon to companies who are in the business of engineering solutions.

Sure sure, though I think at that point the semantics of the word "direct" is probably something we would discuss and find common ground at. By direct I simply mean whatever the shortest VIABLE route is, which may end up being quite circuitous.

I think a good CEO should strive to understand as much of a business he runs as possible. But the larger the company the more I find that it's common that the CEO actually is NOT skilled in the fields most integral to the company's success.

AMD has Lisa Su, but that seems like an exception more than a rule.