this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
149 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13785 readers
865 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'll admit it does ignore asexuality but I think it is an actually interesting bit pertinent to discussion here

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alternative take: Jesus was fully human but was aro ace which is a completely valid and fully human thing to be. So anyone who denies aro or ace identities is actually rejecting Jesus himself

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

turning the dial rapidly between that and "he was gay with all 12 disciples" seeing what makes chuds more upset

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

The Human-With-Divine-Characteristics Centipede

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree, it's why the disclaimer, however I'd also figure aro ace is not something your average christian cartoonist producer "believes" in or respects

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

I just want to take this take to Christian libs who reject valid identities and go YEAH BUT JESUS THO to annoy them

[–] NPa@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

Obviously he was into feet

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

All bets on armpit

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

asexuality

Not fully human, they are actually the father and the holy spirit.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you might have confused us with your pronoun choice here. does "they" refer to Jesus or asexuals

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

asexuals. Jesus was fully human, but some things aren't. Wouldn't Jesus be a he, though?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

well since you were mentioning the trinity maybe I thought you were talking plural

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

It's a well known fact that there is only one god, and Jesus isn't it

#unitarianismgang

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Blasphemy, Garfield would clearly be God himself in this scenario.

Only a piece of shit like nermal would usher in a world where humanity has to wear pants and pay taxes.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Garfield is The Schemer, The Deceiver. He is the Lying Beast. There is nothing holy about him.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

/ˈɡɑɹfild/ → /ˈɡɑːfiwd/ → /ˈɡɑːfjʊd/ → /ˈɡɑːɸjʉd/ → /ˈɡɑːçyd/ → /ˈɡɑːʝyd/ → /ɡɑːʝd/ → /ɡɑːjd/ → /ɡæjd/ → /gæːd/ → /gaːd/ → /gɑːd/

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Okay, that's it, pack it in. The internet was a mistake. I'm going full anarcho primitivist.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

He'd have rested for a lot more than just the seventh day.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

My parents had a cat already before I was born who was named Nermal cause as a kitten he was a cute Lil grey thing. They thought he was a girl cat until his giant dangling balls made it pretty obvious that wasn't the case and Nermal turned out to be a tough fucking cat. Heathcliff coded. Big as hell. And also wasn't a fan of me cause I was a pain in the ass toddler. Once I was older Nerm was cool with me and even would cuddle up with me in his last years when I was getting to be around 10. But I've got some vague memories of waddling down a hall and then just having 10 pounds of cat tackle me when I rounded a corner. I'd always get bonked with a furry part and only got scratched when it was totally my fault but this cat would just sometimes jump off of furniture and land on me to be a jerk.

Garfield would clearly be God himself in this scenario

Indeed he is, as foretold by his holiness st. bhagavan shree matt christman (SAW) large-adult-son

a spitting image of god itself

[–] OldSoulHippie@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bring back Garfield posting

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

TFW it's Monday and I'm not a cat doomjak

[–] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

I could ᓚᘏᗢ but not till after another hour and a half of making the beeps go boop :(

[–] WizardOfLoneliness@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yknow i don't remember anything in the bible about adam and eve getting married

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

That's like the entire plot. Yeah.

[–] aebletrae@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You couldn't, because Eve wasn't called Eve at the time, and because God doesn't deadname trans women.

Original SRS surgeon God creates a woman from male flesh in Genesis 2:22. First ally Adam insists that "she shall be called Woman" in Genesis 2:23. By Genesis 2:25 they're acknowledged as man and wife. But Eve doesn't get her own name until Genesis 3:20, and then that's the only name we ever know her by.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Where does NERVE enter into all this?

The only time Jon can get laid is when he's the only man on earth.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't Jon get married tho

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're not married, but him and Liz have been a couple in the main canon since the 2000s.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Which made me feel bad for Liz. She could easily do better.