I'll admit it does ignore asexuality but I think it is an actually interesting bit pertinent to discussion here
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13785 readers
748 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Alternative take: Jesus was fully human but was aro ace which is a completely valid and fully human thing to be. So anyone who denies aro or ace identities is actually rejecting Jesus himself
turning the dial rapidly between that and "he was gay with all 12 disciples" seeing what makes chuds more upset
The Human-With-Divine-Characteristics Centipede
I agree, it's why the disclaimer, however I'd also figure aro ace is not something your average christian cartoonist producer "believes" in or respects
I just want to take this take to Christian libs who reject valid identities and go YEAH BUT JESUS THO to annoy them
Obviously he was into feet
All bets on armpit
asexuality
Not fully human, they are actually the father and the holy spirit.
I think you might have confused us with your pronoun choice here. does "they" refer to Jesus or asexuals
asexuals. Jesus was fully human, but some things aren't. Wouldn't Jesus be a he, though?
well since you were mentioning the trinity maybe I thought you were talking plural
It's a well known fact that there is only one god, and Jesus isn't it
#unitarianismgang
what?
yes
Blasphemy, Garfield would clearly be God himself in this scenario.
Only a piece of shit like nermal would usher in a world where humanity has to wear pants and pay taxes.
Garfield is The Schemer, The Deceiver. He is the Lying Beast. There is nothing holy about him.
/ˈɡɑɹfild/ → /ˈɡɑːfiwd/ → /ˈɡɑːfjʊd/ → /ˈɡɑːɸjʉd/ → /ˈɡɑːçyd/ → /ˈɡɑːʝyd/ → /ɡɑːʝd/ → /ɡɑːjd/ → /ɡæjd/ → /gæːd/ → /gaːd/ → /gɑːd/
/ˈɡɑːfiwd/
UwU 
Okay, that's it, pack it in. The internet was a mistake. I'm going full anarcho primitivist.
He'd have rested for a lot more than just the seventh day.
Garfield would clearly be God himself in this scenario
Indeed he is, as foretold by his holiness st. bhagavan shree matt christman (SAW) 
a spitting image of god itself
My parents had a cat already before I was born who was named Nermal cause as a kitten he was a cute Lil grey thing. They thought he was a girl cat until his giant dangling balls made it pretty obvious that wasn't the case and Nermal turned out to be a tough fucking cat. Heathcliff coded. Big as hell. And also wasn't a fan of me cause I was a pain in the ass toddler. Once I was older Nerm was cool with me and even would cuddle up with me in his last years when I was getting to be around 10. But I've got some vague memories of waddling down a hall and then just having 10 pounds of cat tackle me when I rounded a corner. I'd always get bonked with a furry part and only got scratched when it was totally my fault but this cat would just sometimes jump off of furniture and land on me to be a jerk.
Yknow i don't remember anything in the bible about adam and eve getting married
You couldn't, because Eve wasn't called Eve at the time, and because God doesn't deadname trans women.
Original SRS surgeon God creates a woman from male flesh in Genesis 2:22. First ally Adam insists that "she shall be called Woman" in Genesis 2:23. By Genesis 2:25 they're acknowledged as man and wife. But Eve doesn't get her own name until Genesis 3:20, and then that's the only name we ever know her by.
Where does NERVE enter into all this?
They're living in SIN?!
That's like the entire plot. Yeah.
Bring back Garfield posting
TFW it's Monday 
TFW it's Monday and I'm not a cat 
You could get lasagna tho
I could ᓚᘏᗢ but not till after another hour and a half of making the beeps go boop :(
The only time Jon can get laid is when he's the only man on earth.
Didn't Jon get married tho
They're not married, but him and Liz have been a couple in the main canon since the 2000s.
Which made me feel bad for Liz. She could easily do better.