this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
531 points (98.5% liked)

News

27567 readers
4702 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being."

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines "non-human" behavior as "any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species," with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Besides them being stupid as hell to conduct this ridiculous culture war, I take issue with another thing, the name:

Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education

It's not unlawful until you forbid it. So the title makes no sense. You're not forbidding the unlawful. You're forbidding the previously lawful, making it unlawful.

Stupid assholes.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Plus the acronym rules are inconsistent. It should be FURRE or FURRORIE

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 27 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Why on earth are they pursuing this. We all know this is not a real problem.

If it was a scare crow to attack trans rights, they have achieved that. They have pulverized trans rights in many places, especially bathroom access.

Who stands to gain from this? It is not a real problem!

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The rage machine requires fuel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i cannot begin to describe how utterly fucking stupid this is.

I genuinely thought i died and went to hell when i first read this, this bill doesn't even make any fucking sense. Child exhibiting "non human behaviors" could be considered "child abuse" according to this bill.

How the fuck do you even enforce this?

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Overreaching Authoritarianism.

Standard Republican kit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 33 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Man they keep coming back to the litterbox thing, it really freaks them tf out. Even though its been debunked dozens of time, my conservative friends all swear they know a guy that knows a guy that swears he saw one for real!

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The litterbox thing is so outrageous that it gives their tyrannical proposals the vineer of addressing a real problem.

But the litterbox story was fabricated, and the only grain of truth of it is that some classrooms did keep kitty litter as a mitigation against being trapped by an active shooter - another conservative-created problem.

They will continue to glom onto outrageous stories, to justify their outrageously oppressive proposals.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oyo@lemm.ee 31 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Maybe the constitution of the United States of America says something about this? Maybe like the first thing in the bill of rights? Nah I must be mistaken.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fascists are so stupid, they start to believe their own propaganda. Can't even remember, or at least be bothered to remember, that they made this up to scare normies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

I always tell people, that they won't stop at LGBTQ+ people, and will eventually go into persecuting other subcultures.

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 33 points 6 days ago (4 children)

My barking at people is protected under the first amendment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] luce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

The law defines "non-human" behavior "any type of behavior... [not typically] displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species,"

NATHON!! STOP ACTING LIKE A HOMO ERECTUS YOU NEANDERTHAL!

also im pretty sure "human" means 'under the homo genus' not 'homo sapien' but its not like it matters to them

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ckjazz@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 days ago

Sooooo much freeedommmm.... By limiting self expression.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

So a furry suit made from human hair is ok? Asking for a friend

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

What is it with them and this absolute conviction that kids are pretending to be cats, it's literally not happening and yet they're upset about it.

If they are going to make things up and then be upset about those made up things can they not come up with something less weird than kids being cats? Why not be upset about all the Dark Lords in schools, or the uptake in alien abductions?

[–] obvs@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

If you're complaining about gay people, you're not complaining about us denying you a living wage.

If you're complaining about transgender people, you're not complaining about us denying you medical care.

If you're complaining about furries, you're not complaining about us denying you education.

I guess we really want you to complain about those things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halferect@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What world do these people live in? I just can't imagine this is a issue and i imagine that passing a law like this will just lead to kids definitely shitting in litter boxes because breaking the law is fun, imagine the court case of a kid dressed like a cat and pissed in a box.. straight to jail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Surgical means‽

Also why are they legislating about this. Texas schools have real problems like gun violence and illiteracy. Furries and animal role play are just things some people have always done that don't really harm anyone and given how they persist across so many cultures and times could actually be considered a natural behavior of homo sapiens like parrots' mimicry

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Does that forbid earrings as well? They're non-biological extensions/modifications of the human body.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

technically all clothing is illegal now?

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

Better yet. Simply wearing glasses?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] astutemural@midwest.social 13 points 6 days ago
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Fuck how the heck they find double entendre.acronyms for any shit they pull. Coincidentally eat shit assholes what the fuck did those poor people do to you? I don't consider myself a furry but have friends that does.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Backronym" is the term I've always heard- starting with the acronym then coming up with what it stands for

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

It would be so funny if schools start "dressup weeks/months" with rotating theme in protest

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So can’t dress as a Republican?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Ironic really, given how right here the cuntservatives are just chasing their own tail.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago

Furries are the ultimate dorks. I know I am very furry affiliated and most of my friends are furries... but this makes being a furry badass nyao.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

'non-human'

this could go much darker than anti-furry biotry, which already isn't great, real fast. is your nose too big? in a non-human way? does a man have tits that are too large? in a non-human way?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago

Oh boy, the fascists have really done it now: they're going after the beastpeople! Beware its poisonous spittle!

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago

Republicans are fucking weirdos.

[–] MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Kinda like this one I know the litter shit is bullshit. Though we all knew those annoying ass kids in school.

[–] jnb@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 days ago

These idiot boomers fell for the facebook propaganda.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_boxes_in_schools_hoax

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

Yeah some kids are annoying, but they're young and learning how to behave in a society. They shouldn't be handcuffed in school and sent to jail. Nor should other kids live in fear of having what they witnessed happen to them (although that's probably the whole point of this).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Is the hacker known as 4Chan at it again?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

You could think that reality has no more pressing problems.

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I bark at them using my very human vocal cords (I don't even have any other). Prove me on court that I was not using human vocal cords to bark. Or maybe I was using totally non-human made recording-speaker device?

Or maybe my 1.7m tall fursuit was designed to be weared by my cat? No way even lololong house cat could be that big. (lie, I don't own a fursuit, in any size, but point still apply).

Oh I know! Some tailed buttplugs were totally designed for pets and it is all about being pet care!

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 days ago (6 children)

tailed buttplugs

The whole comment aside, just for those unaware, if you see someone with a tail in public, or just anywhere outside of sex-centered environment, it's almost surely a belt.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›