this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
57 points (83.5% liked)

News

25226 readers
4248 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

If the independent calculations are correct, DOGE has cut $8 billion in government spending. 20% of that, divided amongst 350 million Americans, would be $4.57. If DOGE's claims are correct (and they're not), they cut $55 billion, which would be $31.43. Even if DOGE met it's goal of $2 trillion, that would be $1,142.86, which would be a significant one time payment for a lot of Americans, but wouldn't offset the loss of Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, a functioning Post Office, etc.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

And the other 80% to himself and his friends.

[–] Netrunner@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is called a bribe. He doesn't want to give any money out but he realizes that firing hundreds of thousands off people and robbing the government clean isn't exactly a slam dunk policy, so instead he's offering you as 2,500$ check to watch this happen.

Sick shit, really.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The initial claim of Musk was that Doge saves $2 trillion... That would be ~$1.2k per citizen.

But honestly I'd be surprised if that figure isn't closer to $100 billion "saved", which would net each american a <$60 cheque. And all of that money goes towards paying higher egg prices.

Edit: changed the numbers to reflect Trump's claim.

[–] manxu@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If only! That's <$300 total "savings," but the proposal is to return only 20% of it, so something <$60

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 2 points 21 hours ago

Damn, you're right!

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Anybody who believes that he would actually do this is someone who would fall for the wallet inspector.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Spend money on taxes to maintain important departments.

The government guts important departments and programs.

Gives just 20% of your taxes back.

Profit?

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

probably to one particular American citizen

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't that cause inflation? Something you were campaigning to reduce?

[–] Obelix@feddit.org 108 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Which is kind of crazy, if you think about it: The federal budget is coming from taxes. So the deal is that Trump is destroying valuable services of federal institutions and only 20% of the "savings" are getting passed on? While normal people will have to pay for stuff like the weather forecast?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Another 20% would go towards paying the federal debt. Ok, but that still leaves out 60%.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you suggest they do with the other 50%?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 17 hours ago

10% should probably go into a slush fund for the emergencies this is going to cause

What do we do with the remaining 25%?

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And he and Elon keep the rest?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

20% of 0 is still 0, Donny-boy.

[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I would love to see that. It's based on lies and we could see how much. Really how much.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And a massive 100% of the "negative savings" (ie damages).

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck you....the asshole doing this could give every American one million and STILL be worth 150 billion. Fuck your saving,I want the govt for the people by the people.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he gave everyone a million that would be like 400 million million… he’s not quite that rich

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

In other words, ~~400 billions~~... he is worth more than that

edit: I messed it up

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

A million million is an order of magnitude more than that.

1,000,000 x 1,000,000 =1,000,000,000,000

(1,000,000,000) is a billion for comparison)

The number x 400 would be like 400 trillion which I think is more than the gdp of the entire world.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Yeap, I messed it up

[–] stetech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

billion is a thousand millions, not a million millions

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

400 trillion

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's your price? Do. Not. Cave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

in other words, it's a stimulus check, a thing that he can put his name on to prevent (and completely fail in doing so) the economic recession that would be caused by his stupid policies making the price of everything go up.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where’s the other 80% going? It’s our tax dollars.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 16 points 1 day ago

Into the pockets of the billionaires.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago

Not any more.. Now it's tax Rubbles, Riyal,and Crypto.

[–] BaldProphet@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago

DOGE would have to actually save money for this to work.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

ok, yeah, sure. whatever you say, jan.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I look forward to three extra dollars in my pocket per year. I'll buy an egg.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Specifically, the American citizens who are part of the Trump administration.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, so the ones who would typically be vehemently against any sort of 'government handout'.

load more comments
view more: next ›