bitwolf

Or put them in places humans can't easily live.

It could be in cold remote areas where they could get the sun for several months at a time, charge huge batteries, and run on battery during the dark months.

They'd have colder ambient air so cheaper to cool.

Or.. return to efficient software values, live within our means, and serve applications from more easily cooled low power chips.

Thus reads like a need for regulation.

Thanks Trump for preventing such regulation.

Once I learned its primarily to poison AI I was for it.

You could accomplish that with a streamer though. The new ones even have IR and can act as universal remotes. This negates the detriment to not having it built into the tv.

Then when it's out of date you replace a 100$ streamer and not a 1000$ tv.

A lot of us skip several upgrade opportunities and just keep saving for something decent that works well with our OS.

Heck, I went over ten years on my last CPU and mobo because I was waiting for the predicted amdgpu nirvana that we have now.

My TV is no different. I've had the same, dumb, 1080p IPS since 2012. Just waiting for a tv that's worth it.

So yeah, if the ideal tv launches at 3k, I'll buy it without a doubt.
I have that money saved from when I didn't leap to 3d, when I didn't leap to OLED and when I didn't leap to 4k.

Ah so close!

If it lacked any smart tv features and had displayport it would be my next tv.

I wish govts would stop Starlink from happening.

It seems like an apocalypse contributor with all that could go wrong. And I can't really see how it could ever outperform terrestrial 5g mesh networks or fiber.

I'm confused, isn't the lack of information also information?

Amateurs don't even use .toLower()

Oh so we don't have money for war, for Medicare, or for feeding the meek and humble.

Gotta celebrate the small wins.

But isn't the measurement of the speed of light our own proportion derived from the constant that is 1g of water at 1ATM?