this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
449 points (98.7% liked)

Greentext

5198 readers
1257 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 116 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fun fact, because of the great depression, canned pet food has to be safe for human consumption.

Well, for now, at least

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 89 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fucking human food isn't safe for human consumption any more.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

You complain about microplastics in our food.

I am happy about the extra synthetic fiber intake.

We are not the same.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

With RFK in charge, I give it 3 months before all regulations on canned goods are rescinded, and one year before people start dying from botulism left right and center. And we'll all put up with it, because it's mainly the poors eating canned food anyway, and we don't have the wherewithal to revolt

[–] HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 week ago

I couldn't find anything on the great depression requiring pet food to be safe for human consumption. I would love for someone to prove me wrong through.

According to this PetMD article, prior to WW2 pet food was a luxury item. During WW2 pet food production completely stopped due to the war. (No cited sources on this article though, I am not sure how accurate it's claims are?)

According to this Vice article, pet food is held to some standards but technically does not need to be safe for human consumption. (Again, I am not sure how trustworthy of a source Vice is)

This is the best source I have found, a peer reviewed and cited research article published on Jan 30th 2023: Insights-Driven Development of Humanized Foods for Pets. It clashes with the above article in that it talks about pet food production during WW2 and actually cites sources. In regards to pet food being required to be fit for human consumption, it doesn't mention anything about the great depression. It actually mentions that this is a more recent development and that there still isn't a "set standard"

A seemingly simple yet confusing claim that has appeared recently in the pet food space is “human-grade,” whereby additional regulations regarding manufacturing, packaging, and storing of the food ensure compliance with safety standards of human consumption guidelines (Oba et al., 2020). Although this claim has been used for pet foods for a few years, it has no definition in animal feed regulations. The term “edible,” however, is defined by the US Department of Agriculture as foodstuffs that have been processed, inspected, and passed manufacturing regulations that are designed to ensure safety for consumption by humans. Pet foods that truly meet this standard must include only ingredients that are human edible and must be manufactured, packed, and held in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 (AAFCO, 2021; FDA, 2022). Currently, AAFCO is in the process of drafting guidance for “human-grade” claims in pet foods in an attempt to provide clarity to the claim (AAFCO, 2021). The proposed definition outlines that pet foods using the “human-grade” claim are first and foremost animal food products that are subjected to inspection under 21 CFR 507, manufacturing must be in accordance with 21 CFR 110, and the overall process is conducted according to standards ensuring human consumption safety (Carter et al., 2014; Oba et al., 2020; FDA, 2022). Furthermore, the pet food bearing a “human-grade” claim must be manufactured in accordance with the applicable human food regulations for ready-to-eat human food (AAFCO, 2021, 2022)

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Ounce for ounce, this shit is wildly expensive. You could eat far cheaper and not be you know... eating fucking cat food.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please don’t eat this. My cat needs his gainz

[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My neighbor has an indoor cat that spends all day getting into the highest spots he can find. This is his hobby. I've watched him get down from on top of the high-hung cupboards and the way he did it... it was like the whole apartment was his planet fitness. They all called him fat, because at first glance, sure you could say that.

He got down to come see me when I first visited and I was 100% sure that I never wanted to mess with this cat. It was like patting a fuzzy wall. He is not fat. Bro is built like a tank. He's literally V shaped. He's survived years with three pitbull dogs that like to chase him and try to use him as a toy. Out of all the animals there, that is the scariest one. That's what happens when your cat uses ALL the protein in that food for gainz.

I pointed this out to one of the neighbors and the look on their faces as they realized I was right.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

And then there's the other kind of cat (mine) that uses all the protein to become pear-shaped.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Cat food isn't even any more expensive than canned tuna and other similar canned meats. You're not saving any money. You're eating cat food for no reason!

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Do you mean "cat food isn't even less expensive..."?

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

That does appear to be how words be.

[–] Dhar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

What if the reason is flavour?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ordinary Sausage made a sausage out of cat food. Gave it 3.5/5; higher than quite a few made out of "regular" food. Make of that what you will.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

🎶 LeeEEeet's SaaaAAAAUUUuusaAAgeeee 🎶

[–] lime@feddit.nu 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well he is clinically insane.

the one-two punch of the $40B lobster and the 300-step garbage can nachos cracked his mind.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

B for billion. i would use G but i think it could be mistaken for "grand"

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm confused still I guess. He bought and ate a 40 billion dollar item?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

he bought $30 worth of lobster tails and made a sausage, and he says multiple times in the video that he thinks it was too much money. but people kept requesting even stupider sausages so he just got more and more annoyed that he had spent the money, and over the years the running gag became that every time the lobster is mentioned the price goes up

Edit: also if you compare his tone in that video to one of his more recent ones you'll understand what i meant about insanity ("three mark ruffalooooos!!!")

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Okay thanks for the explanation. 🤣

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't imagine it's much worse than Vienna sausages in that form, and someone is eating enough of those to keep them on store shelves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

That's anons goal. Anon collects rocks.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Closest thing to a job they have too

[–] Zier@fedia.io 23 points 1 week ago

Pate of cow and chicken buttholes? No thanks, I prefer Soylent Green, just add cheese in a can!

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just so everyone knows, Fancy Feast is owned by Nestle, so if you want to avoid their products, eat a different brand of cat food.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Thanks. Now I just gotta know which dog food to eat and I can finally get jacked

[–] loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wet cat food is one of the worst things I've ever put in my mouth. Don't do it. It isn't worth it.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

For one thing, cats can't handle the level of salt in human diet. So to a human, cat food is very bland. This is also why one shouldn't feed cat salty human food.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

No. That wouldn't be repreaentative of what cats experience.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I'm not fancy enough

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I once made chicken liver pate for my cats, as a treat. It was only chicken liver pan-fried in a bit of lard, with a bit of salt. My cats flat out refused, but it turned out delicious so I froze it into cubes for myself, and ate it across the span of two weeks.

I still prepare it often, albeit with a different recipe.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey my cat likes that one! Cheap, too

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I bought one for my cats a while ago. I was opening a can of something else (I forget, spam maybe) with the same pull off lid and they full on sprint towards me meowing like I hadn't just fed them an hour before.

[–] nick@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago

That’s cats for you.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, it was definitely the spam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Happens with cans of everything.

Lonely, social security, grandmas gettin in dat protein

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there's no way it has that much protein in it

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apparently that can has 91kcal/can, and 10% of it is "crude protein." Protein provides about 4 calories per gram, so one can is 2g protein.

If we scale to 250 kcal, that's 6g protein.

Not sure I want to know where OP got their numbers from...

Also, regular chicken breast has higher protein content than this cat food, and it's probably cheaper per calorie.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Does it give you a glossy coat though?

load more comments
view more: next ›