lvxferre

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

You got me curious, so I checked it.

I downloaded this wordlist with 479k words, and used find+replace to count four strings: cie, cei, ie, ei. Here's the result:

  • 16566 (75%) ie vs. 5649 (25%) ei
  • 875 cie (74%) vs. 302 cei (26%)

So the basic rule (i before e) holds some merit, but the "except after c" part is bullshit - it's practically the same distribution.

Of course, this takes all words as equiprobable; results would be different if including the odds of a word appearing in the text into the maths.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Lukewarm.

If I can install the program from a .deb I'll do it, even if it's outdated in comparison with the flatpak version. But if there's only a flatpak version I'll use it.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

It's a general pattern someone noticed and then rhymed, that ⟨ie⟩ is more likely to appear than ⟨ei⟩ in English, except after ⟨c⟩. But it is not a real rule, there's no orthographic restriction behind that pattern, not even an underlying phonemic reason. So you're bound to see exceptions everywhere, to the point the pattern is useless as a mnemonic.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I made Siegfrieda a cardboard tank:

She loved it.

(I'm planning to redo it later on, to make it better-looking for humans. Plus build Kika a house, it'll be called "le Chat-eau".)

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

She's in deep reflection, regretting her last Tonitrus bolt.

...not really.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It was also full of things a few people would love, and most would hate. Eventually replaced by things that are bland, unoffensive, "one size for all"; nobody hates them, but nobody loves them either.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I live in a temperate region, so sub-zero temperatures are already kind of uncommon, even in winter. So it barely snows here - last two times were in 1975 and in 2013. (It does hail sometimes, though. Bloody hail last year killed one of my pepper plants ;_;)

That said I'd probably shape and pack individual blocks. Perhaps even glue them together with some water, if it's cold enough for that.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Corporations. The matter is how: walled gardens, exploiting the commons, EEE, creating new barriers of entry, etc.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think AI could be used to check ones work so we don’t get typos in translations

It's great you mentioned this, because I forgot to do it: AI is a great proofreader. Specially if you're going to send the stuff to an actual = human proofreader later on; it means they won't need to pay attention to spelling or grammar, they can focus better on meaning and style.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Based on file modification dates, it's this drunken cow:

It's from October 2004. Initially I doodled it in my lab notebook; back then I was a Chemistry freshman, and I always doodled my stuff like this. Then I redid it in a computer.

(Her name is Vaquetila. Vaca = cow, etila = ethyl.)

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“It's a real, serious failing of human beings that we take 5 years to translate [Ascendance of a Bookworm,] a series of 33 books, while AI does it in an afternoon,” he said.

If I had to guess, most of those five years were spent on a handful of specially problematic chapters, while the bulk of the books was relatively straightforward.

Quof said he does not take MTPE jobs because “I think I have enough skill in Japanese and English that MTL tools do not currently improve my output. It would make my workflow harder because, as one used to providing 97% or higher accuracy, I would feel compelled to fix the AI's errors up to that high standard, and that would slow me down dramatically.” But over the years, Quof has had a habit of checking his own translations against AI tools.

My experience pretty much matches Quof's: it takes longer to fix a shitty machine translation than to do it by hand. It is however useful to check how ChatGPT or Google Translate would do it, specially for the problem bits.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I spent 2 hours trying to make the RAM follow the color scheme

Dunno if you had the same issue as I did, where OpenRGB didn't detect the RAM sticks, and they simply used the default colour scheme. But, just in case this helps anyone here, here's how I fixed it in my computer. (I'll explain how through the terminal, for my own convenience, but do note you could use grub-customiser instead. Also, note that in my case the system is installed, not running through a USB stick.)

  1. Open a terminal. Then type sudo nano /etc/default/grub, Enter, type your password, Enter.
  2. This will open a text file in the terminal. Look for a line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT. It'll have a few words after it, like quiet splash; after all those words, add acpi_enforce_resources=lax. Save (Ctrl+O) then exit (Ctrl+X) the file.
  3. Still in the terminal, update grub, through the command sudo update-grub.
  4. Restart your machine, then open OpenRGB and tell it to "rescan devices". Now it should be detecting the sticks properly.

With that out of the way: Linux is not to blame for either issue, but Apple and mobo manufacturers respectively. Both love some vendor lock-in, and do everything they can to prevent compatibility between their own junk and competitors. (You can be pretty sure iTunes wouldn't work with Windows if MacOS market share was higher.)

 

The spiders in question are Stegodyphus dumicola aka African social spiders.

I couldn't find a link to the video in the article itself so here it is. Discretion is advised - it is fascinating and horrifying at the same time.

 

Interesting short text about the history of Finnish, focusing mostly on its interaction with nearby Germanic languages.

 

Archive link: https://archive.is/20240503184140/https://www.science.org/content/article/human-speech-may-have-universal-transmission-rate-39-bits-second

Interesting excerpt:

De Boer agrees that our brains are the bottleneck. But, he says, instead of being limited by how quickly we can process information by listening, we're likely limited by how quickly we can gather our thoughts. That's because, he says, the average person can listen to audio recordings sped up to about 120%—and still have no problems with comprehension. "It really seems that the bottleneck is in putting the ideas together."

Ah, here's a link to the paper!

 

I regret not posting it before Canvas 2025, but hopefully it'll be useful for people playing it in 2026. All letters are 5 pixels tall, and most 3 pixels wide (some 4, a few 5). I've also included a few Cyrillic letters and the digits.

I tried to make it even smaller, but it gets really funky.

 

Interesting video on the stone that allowed researchers to decipher Ancient Egyptian. Check comments for a few notes.

 

Additional links with press coverage: ArcheologyMag, Oxford.

For context:

The Huns were nomadic people from Central Eurasia; known for displacing a bunch of Iranian (e.g. Alans) and and Germanic (e.g. Goths, Suebians etc.) speakers, that ultimately invaded the Roman Empire. They reached the Volga around 370 CE, and one of their leaders (Attila) is specially famous. Often believed to be a Turkic people, but if the study is correct they're from a completely different language family instead.

The Xiōng-Nú are mentioned by Chinese sources as one of the "Five Barbarians" (i.e. non-Han people). They would've lived in Central Eurasia between 300 BCE and 100 CE or so, and eventually became Han tributaries.

The Paleo-Siberian language in question would be an older form of Arin, a Yeniseian language. Yup, that same family believed by some to have relatives in the Americas.

 
 

For further info, if anyone is interested, Stephen Bax claimed a decade ago to partially decode the manuscript; here's a video with his reasoning, as well as the paper he released. Sadly Bax passed away in 2017 (may he rest in peace), so the work was left incomplete.

 

The main idea behind this language is to become evolutionary food for other languages of my conworld. As such I'll probably never flesh it out completely, only the necessary to make its descendants feel a bit more natural.

Constructive criticism is welcome.

Context and basic info

The conworld I'm building has three classical languages, spoken 2~3 millenniums before the conworld present: Old Sirtki, Classical Tarune, and Mäkşna. And scholars in the conworld present are reconstructing their common ancestor, that they call "Proto-Sitama".

What I'm sharing here, however is none of their fancy reconstructions. It's the phonology of the language as it was spoken 7 millenniums before the conworld present. Its native name was /kʲær.mi.'zɑst/, or roughly "what we speak"; the language itself had no written version but it'll be romanised here as ⟨Cjermizást⟩.

Its native speakers were a semi-nomadic people, who lived mostly of livestock herding. They'd stay in a region with their herds, collect local fruits and vegetables, and then migrate for more suitable pasture as their animals required.

It was quite a departure from the lifestyle of their star travelling ancestors, who were born in a highly industrialised society in another planet.

Grammar tidbits

Grammar-wise, Cjermizást was heavily agglutinative, with an absolutive-ergative alignment and Suffixaufnahme. So typically you'd see few long polymorphemic words per sentence. Those morphemes don't always "stack" nicely together, so you often see phonemes being elided, mutated, or added to the word.

Consonants

Manner \ Set Hard Soft
Nasals /m n/ /mʲ ɲ/
Voiceless stop /p t k/ /pʲ tʲ kʲ/
Voiced stop /b d g/ /bʲ dʲ gʲ/
Voiceless fric. /ɸ s x/ /fʲ ʃ ç/
Voiced fric. /w z ɣ/ /vʲ ʒ j/
Liquids /l r/ /ʎ rʲ/

Cjermizást features a contrast between "soft" and "hard" consonants. "Soft" consonants are palatalised, palatal, or post-alveolar; "hard" consonants cannot have any of those features. Both sets are phonemic, and all those consonants can surface outside clusters.

Palatalised consonants spawn a really short [j], that can be distinguished from true /j/ by length.

Although /j/ and /w/ are phonetically approximants, the language's phonology handles them as fricatives, being paired with /ɣ/ and /vʲ/ respectively.

/r rʲ/ surface as trills or taps, in free variation. The trills are more typical in simple onsets, while the taps in complex onsets and coda.

The contrast between /m n/ is neutralised when preceding another consonant in the same word, since both can surface as [m n ŋ]; ditto for /mʲ nʲ/ surfacing as [mʲ ɱʲ ɲ].

Coda /g/ can also surface as [ŋ], but only in word final position; as such, it doesn't merge with the above.

Liquids clustered with voiceless fricatives and/or stops have voiceless allophones.

Vowels

Proto-Sitama's vowel system is a simple square: /æ i ɒ u/. They have a wide range of allophones, with three situations being noteworthy:

  • /ɒ u/ are typically fronted to [Œ ʉ] after a soft consonant
  • /æ i/ are backed to [ɐ ɪ] after a hard velar
  • unstressed vowels are slightly centralised

Accent

Accent surfaces as stress, and it's dictated by the following rules:

  1. Some suffixes have an intrinsic stress. If the word has 1+ of those, then assign the primary stress to the last one. Else, assign it to the last syllable of the root.
  2. If the primary stress fell on the 5th/7th/9th/etc.-to-last syllable, move it to the 3rd-to-last
  3. If the primary stress fell on the 4th/6th/8th/etc.-to-last syllable, move it to the 2nd-to-last.
  4. Every two syllables, counting from the one with the primary stress, add a secondary stress.

Phonotactics

Max syllable is CCVCC, with the following restrictions:

  • complex onset: [stop] + [liquid]; e.g. /pl/ is a valid onset, */pw/ isn't
  • complex coda: [liquid or nasal] + [stop or fricative]; e.g. /nz/ is a valid coda, */dz/ isn't

If morphology would create a syllable violating such structure, an epenthetic /i/ dissolves the cluster.

Consonant clusters cannot mix hard and soft consonants. When such a mix would be required by the morphology, the last consonant dictates if the whole cluster should be soft or hard, and other consonants are mutated into their counterparts from the other set. For example, */lpʲ/ and */ʃp/ would be mutated to /ʎpʲ/ and /sp/.

Stops and fricatives clustered together cannot mix voice. Similar to the above, the last consonant of the cluster dictates the voicing of the rest; e.g. */dk/ and */pz/ would be converted into /tk/ and /bz/ respectively.

Gemination is not allowed, and two identical consonants next to each other are simplified into a singleton. Nasal consonants are also forbidden from appearing next to each other, although a cluster like /nt.m/ would be still valid.

Word-internal hiatuses are dissolved with an epenthetic /z/. Between words most speakers use a non-phonemic [ʔ], but some use [z] even in word boundaries.

Romanisation

As mentioned at the start, the people who spoke Cjermizást didn't write their own language. As such the romanisation here is solely a convenience.

  • /m n p t b d g s x w z l r/ are romanised as in IPA
  • /k ɸ ɣ/ are romanised ⟨c f y⟩
  • "soft" consonants are romanised as their "hard" counterparts, plus ⟨j⟩
  • ⟨j⟩ is omitted inside clusters; e.g. /pʲʎ/ is romanised as ⟨plj⟩, not as *⟨pjlj⟩
  • /æ i ɒ u/ are ⟨e i a u⟩
 
 

Use this thread to ask questions or share trivia, if you don't want to create a new thread for that.

[Note: the purpose of this thread is to promote activity, not to concentrate it. So if you'd still rather post a new thread, by all means - go for it!]

view more: next ›