It does, but this is a vicious cycle: small market share → devs don't release Linux versions for their software → the software ecosystem is fragile → users who'd rather use Linux still need to use Windows → small market share. Anything countering any of those "links" weakens the vicious cycle, including Microsoft pissing off some Windows users; that's why the penguin gets smug, because they know "Winrows is now an Agenric OS lol lmao" means slightly higher Linux market share.
It's like one of my cats. When she's doing something silly, and I grab the phone to take her pic, all I get is a picture of her butt. Because to observe something you need to interact with it, and when I interact with her she collapses into the "I wants buttslaps!" state.
And before I watch it, she's in a superposition of states. Much like Schrödinger's cat. However her states aren't dead vs. alive; they're "sleeping", "licking her own buttocks", and "ruining my Christmas decoration".
Your typical Linux user gets really smug when learning about dumb shit Microsoft is doing with Windows. Just like that penguin in the OP. Because that dumb shit is making plenty Windows users consider ditching Windows for Linux.
One of those things is to force-feed AI into the users. Exemplified by Microsoft seeking to transform Windows into an "agentic OS". People who don't know how those systems work don't want it; and people who do, even less.
"Windows is now an agentic OS".
In the specific case of clanker vocab leaking into the general population, that's no big deal. Bots are "trained" towards bland, unoffensive, neutral words and expressions; stuff like "indeed", "push the boundaries of", "delve", "navigate the complexities of $topic". Mostly overly verbose discourse markers.
However when speaking in general grounds you're of course correct, since the choice of words does change the meaning. For example, a "please" within a request might not change the core meaning, but it still adds meaning - because it conveys "I believe to be necessary to show you respect".
Leftover polenta from yesterday lunch with two eggs, some yerba, and a cig.
And AI sucks at that. If you interpret its output as a human-made summary, it shows everything you shouldn't do — such as conflating what's written with its assumptions over what's written, or missing the core of the text for the sake of random excerpts (that might imply the opposite of what the author wrote).
But, more importantly: people are getting used to babble, that what others say has no meaning. They will not throw it into an AI to summarise it, and when they do it, they won't understand the AI output.
I don't see a big deal given
- What matters the most is not the words within an utterance, but the discourse conveyed by that utterance. [Translation: how you say it matters less than what you say.]
- Word usage is prone to trends. Not just slang. Easy come, easy go.
What I am concerned however is that those chatbots babble a bloody lot. And people might be willing to accept babble a bit more, due to exposure lowering their standards. And they kind of give up looking for meaning on what others say.
It isn't that bad. At least now. But if there's at least one stray in your neighbourhood, you can be pretty sure he'll smell it from afar, and he'll sit just like that cat, watching the oven.
Yes. Typically only Sunday, and the owner of the "dog TV" being a small market: grocery store, bakery, etc.
Bit of language trivia: you know, commercial rotisserie ovens? Like this one?

Here in Brazil they're known as "TV de cachorro". Literally "dog TV". Guess why: because you always get a bunch of stray dogs staring it, just like the cat in the OP.
Something like this, indeed. Or more like a product of the situation, plus a few laws - like network effect (the value a user derives from the OS depends on the number of users using it).
Note that not even the devs are to blame for this; it makes sense someone releasing commercial software would focus on the 70% (Windows), sometimes on the 15% (Mac OS), but almost never on the 4% (Linux).