[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 7 minutes ago

Kids and dogs:

  • are messy eaters
  • are loud at inconvenient times
  • spread dirt on your clean floor
  • run and play like hell
  • sleep like rocks
  • complain about being thrown into the bathtub
  • complain about being taken off the bathtub
  • silently wreck your things once left unmonitored
  • are too cute to scold properly
  • annoy the hell out of your neighbours
  • and you still can't stop loving them. ♥

So yup, having one is perfect practice for the other! Although people typically do the opposite (use dogs to train for kids).

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 17 minutes ago

I think that you answered the wrong comment, but... who cares?

Stew eating trick: with a bowl and enough bread, spoon is fluff.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

No, this is projecting your bias onto it

The fact that Zionism is incompatible with Jewish-Arabic peaceful coexistence was already attested at least way back in 1975, by the UN General Assembly, that equated it with racism. It is also consistent with the fact that the state of Israel does not recognise Palestine as another state (as it shows that Israel sees those lands as its own by right, due to Zionism being its official ideology). And it is backed by a well-established tertiary source, itself backed by multiple sources of lower order.

So let me be blunt: cut off the crap. You could claim that I'm being misled or something like this, but you cannot honestly claim that I'm "projecting my bias" into it. And by doing the later you're being at the very least disingenuous (i.e. using dishonest argumentation), if not also outright assumptive (i.e. making shit up).

attributing the basic concept to those that are stretching the definition beyond its original intent.

"Intention" - whatever it means - does not exist outside your head.

This is contextually relevant here given that moderators have no crystal ball to know your "intentions", so rule enforcement should be based on what you say. And in this case what you said is misinformation - regardless of your "intentions" behind the utterance. As such I keep my view that one of the removals was a false positive, but the other was accurate.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

I should've taken spelling-based transcription errors into account; my bad! (This happens a lot, even among professional linguists.)

Variety-wise odds are that you speak the Caipira dialect, given the region of origin. Or potentially a mixed dialect. Either way it's [i u] all the way in MG, and almost all the way in SP.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

This was not, nor is it now a prerequisite, nor part of the definition.

It is, given the nationalistic nature of Zionism and the region that it prescribes for the Jewish people being already inhabited by the Palestinian Arabs. Not just historically, mind you - Zionism prescribes that even the current Palestinian lands should belong to the state of Israel.

Note that this is extremely close to the Nazi policy of Lebensraum, or "vital space". It is that bad.

There were and are solutions that could benefit both Israelis and Arabs if they would sit down and settle it peacefully, which was my whole point.

Peaceful solutions are in direct conflict with Zionism. And the fact that you were proposing those, hints to me that you aren't Zionist, you're simply using the word in a bad way.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago

To be a moral agent, your actions towards others need to have consequences for yourself - be those consequences direct, social, emotional, or something else. And intelligence on itself doesn't provide those consequences.

The nearest that you could do, with AGI alone, would be to hardcode it with ethical principles, but that's another matter. (I'm saying this because people often conflate ethics and morality, even if they're two different cans of worms.)

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

It's a concept rooted in ethno-cultural nationalism, about Israel having a right to exist at the detriment of the Arabs in the region. The omission of those pieces of info that I've highlighted misleads the reader towards an incorrect conclusion, and that's what makes it misinformation.

I fully agree however with the comment you mentioned in the OP not being a call to violence, but the opposite.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I disagree; it's rather clear what Cephalotrocity is arguing against violence, even if I happen to outright disagree with his views when it comes to the state of Israel.

~~EDIT: on the other hand I'm not sure about the other comment flagged as misinformation.~~ Further EDIT: nah, the mods were spot on with that one. "Zionism is simply [the state of] Israel existing peacefully."?

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Fuck, that sounds too amazing to not try. Thanks for the idea! I'll try it the next Sunday, as I'm planning pork knuckles for lunch. (I'd try it today but I'm preparing Zebu hump so it doesn't combo that well.)

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

That reinforces what you said about being very likely in the autism spectrum - when I say "most people use implicatures all the time", the exceptions are typically people in the spectrum. Some can detect implicatures through analysis, and in some cases they have previous knowledge of a specific implicature so they can handle that one; but to constantly analyse what you hear, read, say and write is laborious and emotionally displeasing, it fits really well what you said in the OP.

(Interestingly that "all the time" that I used has the same implicature as the "all the millionaires" from your example - epistemically, the "all" doesn't convey "the complete set without exceptions" in either, but rather "a noteworthy large proportion of the set". "Boo millionaires" is also a good interpretation but it's about the attitude of the speaker, not the truth/falseness of the statement.)

This conversation gave me an idea - I'll encourage my mum (who's most likely in the autism spectrum) to give ChatGPT a try. Just to see her opinion about it.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

I’m sure a linguist could dive way more into depth, but “not English words” is the equivalent of “not a true Scotsman”.

Pretty much. Once speakers start using the word, and expecting others to understand it, it's already part of the lexicon of that language. Specially if you see signs of phonetic adaptation, like /ø/ becoming /u:/ in a language with no /ø/ (see: "lieu") - and yet it's exactly why people complain about those words.

And this sort of complain isn't even new. Nor the backslash agianst it, as Catullus 84 shows for Latin and Greek.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 23 points 8 hours ago

That seems sensible.

Even a hypothetically true artificial general intelligence would still not be a moral agent, thus it cannot be held responsible for its actions; as such, whoever deploys and maintains it should be held responsible. That's doubly true with LLMs as they aren't even intelligent to begin with.

0
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/canvas@toast.ooo

[Idea] If you don't want to see huge flags taking space over actual drawings in the Canvas, pick the biggest flag that you can find to deface.

As long as a lot of people are doing that, the ones templating larger flags will be forced to reduce their layouts and give more room for actual drawings.


[Reasoning] When it comes to country flags, I think that the immense majority of the users can be split into four groups:

  1. The ones who don't want to see country flags at all.
  2. The ones who are OK with smaller flags, but don't want to see larger ones.
  3. The ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of space.
  4. The ones who want to see the whole canvas burning, like the void.

I'm myself firmly rooted into #1, but this idea is a compromise between #1, #2 and #4.

Typically #3 uses numbers (and/or bots) to seize a huge chunk of the canvas to their flags. Well, let's use numbers against it then. As long as #1, #2 and #4 are trying to wreck the same flag, we win.


[inb4]

But what about identity flags?

Not a problem. They're typically bands instead of thick squares, and people drawing them are fairly accommodating.

But what about [insert another thing]

Even if [thing] is a problem, it's probably minor in comparison with huge country flags.

What should be the template?

None. We don't need one, as long as everyone is working against the same large flag.

Just draw something of your choice over the flag, preferably over its iconic features.

But I'm not creative enough for that!

No matter how shitty your drawing is, it's probably still way more original than a country flag. So don't feel discouraged.

That said, you can always help someone else with their drawing. Or plop in some text. Or just void.

Why are you posting this now, you bloody Slowpoke?

I wish that I thought about this before Canvas 2024. But better later than never. (And better early by a year for Canvas 2025.)


EDIT: addressing on general grounds some whining from group #3 (the ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of the canvas space).

You do realise that this sort of "war against the largest flag" should benefit even you, as long as the biggest flag is not the one you're working with, right? Even for you, this makes the canvas a more even level field. Let us not forget that you love to cover other flags with your own.

81
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

I'm sharing this here mostly due to the alphabet. The relevant region (Tartessos) would be roughly what's today the western parts of Andalucia, plus the Algarve.

Here are the news in Spanish, for anyone interested.

The number of letters is specially relevant for me - 32 letters. The writing system is a redundant alphabet, where you use different graphemes for the stops, depending on the next vowel; and it was likely made for a language with five vowels, so you had five letters for /p/, five for /t/, five for /k/. Counting the "bare" vowels this yields 20 letters; /m n s r l/ fit well with that phonology, but what about the other seven?

13
submitted 3 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/spiders@lemmy.world

Context: some days ago, I commented in a topic about Argiope bruennichi that I had a similar spider living on my kumquat tree, later identified to be Argiope argentata. And @quinacridone@lemmy.ml asked for an update, if she laid eggs.

So, here they are. Sadly I couldn't even notice that she laid eggs, let alone photograph the egg sac. But hey, I got little cute spiders~

Here's their mum, Kumoko:

312
submitted 4 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/cat@lemmy.world
18
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/cooking@lemmy.world

This recipe is great to repurpose lunch leftovers for dinner. It's also relatively mess-free. Loosely based on egg-fried rice.

Amounts listed for two servings, but they're eyeballed so use your judgment.

Ingredients:

  • Cooked leftover rice. 200~300g (cooked) is probably good enough. It's fine to use pilaf, just make sure that the rice is cold, a bit dry, and that the grains are easy to separate.
  • Two eggs. Cracked into a small bowl and whisked with salt, pepper, and MSG. Or the seasoning of your choice.
  • Veg oil. For browning.
  • Water. Or broth if you want, it's just a bit.
  • [OPTIONAL] Meats. Leftover beef, pork, or chicken work well. Supplement it with ham, firmer sausages, and/or bacon; 1/2 cup should be enough for two. Dice them small.
  • [OPTIONAL] Vegs. I'd add at least half raw onion; but feel free to use leftover cooked cabbages, peas, bell peppers, etc. Or even raw ones. Also diced small.
  • [OPTIONAL] Chives. Mostly as a finishing touch. Sliced thinly.

Preparation:

  1. Add a spoonful of veg oil to a wok or similar. Let it heat a bit.
  2. If using raw meats: add them to the wok, and let them brown on high fire, stirring constantly. Else, skip this step.
  3. If using raw vegs: add them to the wok, and let them it cook on mid-low fire. Else, skip this step.
  4. Add the already cooked ingredients (rice, meats, vegs). Medium fire, stirring gentle but constantly; you want to heat them up, not to cook them further. Adjust seasoning if desired.
  5. Spread the whisked egg over your heated rice mix, while stirring and folding the rice frenetically. You want the egg to coat the rice grains, but they should be still separated when done. If some whisked egg is sticking to the wok and/or the rice is too dry, drip some water/broth and scrap the bottom of the wok; just don't overdo it (you don't want soggy rice). Anyway, when the egg is cooked this step is done, it'll give the rice grains a nice yellow colour and lots of flavour.
  6. If using chives, add them after your turned off the fire (they get sad if cooked). Enjoy your meal.

I was going to share a picture of the final result, but I may or may not have eaten it before thinking about sharing the recipe. Sorry. :#

162
submitted 5 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/cat@lemmy.world

I got a weird problem involving both of my cats (Siegfrieda, to the left; Kika, to the right).

Kika is rather particular about having her own litterbox(es), and refuses to use a litterbox shared by another cat. Frieda on the other hand is adept to the "if I fits, I sits, I shits" philosophy, and is totally OK sharing litterboxes.

That creates a problem: no matter if properly and regularly cleaned, the only one using litterboxes here is Frieda. We had, like, five of them at once; and Kika would still rather do her business on the patio.

How do I either teach Kika "it's fine to share a litterbox", or teach Siegfrieda "that's Kika's litterbox, leave it alone"?

5
submitted 5 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz
25
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/houseplants@mander.xyz

Context: my mum got some keikis of this orchid from a neighbour. She managed to grow them into a full plant, it even flowered (as per pic), but she has no idea on which species of orchid it is.

I am not sure if it's a native species here (I'm in the subtropical parts of South America), but it seems to be growing just fine indoors in a Cfb climate.

Disregard the vase saying "phal azul" (blue phal), it used to belong to another orchid; it doesn't seem to be a Phalaenopsis.

If necessary I can provide further pics, but note that it has lost the flowers already.

Any idea?


EDIT: thanks to @jerry@fedia.io's comment, we could find it - it's a Miltoniopsis. Likely from Colombia or Ecuador, not from my area.

312
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works

I feel slightly offended. Because it's true.

(Alt text: "Do you feel like the answer depends on whether you're currently in the hole, versus when you refer to the events later after you get out? Assuming you get out.")

xkcd source

18

Link to the community: !isekai@ani.social

Feel free to join and talk about your favourite series. The rules are rather simple, and they're there to ensure smooth discussion.

2
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

I'm sharing this mostly as a historical curiosity; Schleicher was genial, but the book is a century and half old, science marches on, so it isn't exactly good source material. Still an enjoyable read if you like Historical Linguistics, as it was one of the first successful attempts to reconstruct a language based on indirect output from its child languages.

2
submitted 8 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

Link for the Science research article. The observation that societies without access to softer food kind of avoided labiodentals is old, from 1985, but the research is recent-ish (2019).

view more: next ›

lvxferre

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF