this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
898 points (99.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27135 readers
3779 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 35 points 6 hours ago

This is peak licensing

[–] ailepet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Wait I though the point of these post-opensource clauses (see also: anti-capitalist licence, WTFPL, etc.) was to scare off the big corporations lawyers and make sure your code won't end up in AWS or something like that? Are Linux distros the only actors who are still giving a shit about licencing?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you want to scare corporations use AGPL or, if you're feeling spicy, SSPL. Do not use WTFPL, it's too permissive.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Always were.

Big companies care too but only if their cya arm knows enough about software to actually enforce anything. A lot don't.

[–] muelltonne@feddit.org 59 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

The biggest problem with such a clause is that it is hard to define "evil", even if it seems clear to you. Some people think that abortion is evil, so are abortion clinics banned from Json? What about the military and weapon manufacturers? Killing is evil, but you all know how the discourse about the military as national heroes that can't be evil in the US goes. What about a service like X - is it evil? Can you define "evil" for a surveillance tool that brands itself as ad tech?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The clause also states that the product MUST be used for Good, which is a higher bar. I'd imagine most things JSON is used for are fairly morally neutral.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I'd imagine most things JSON is used for are fairly morally neutral.

a lawsuit waiting to happen. Json has been a real dick lately sending his lawyers after everyone

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah I would imagine this is the point

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 5 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Ask every single person what is the definition of evil and merge all the answers into one definition

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 1 points 48 minutes ago

The law is basically this, it’s why nearly everyone hates the government.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago

That'd be all the things.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 8 hours ago

You'd end up with Schrödinger's Evil

[–] Upust_Krwi@thelemmy.club -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Every person should act according to their own morals.

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

There would be so much violence in the world if they did.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

OK but how can json have a license? I understand a particular json parser having a license, but how can a specification, which contains no code, even be considered "software"?

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Uh define code there. What about when storage and code are both on a machine that considers both instructions and data to be data? Is a spec not a creative work? Is code not just a spec?

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

It's generally accepted that file formats aren't protected IP, so you can write a compatible reader or writer and be in the clear as long as you reused no code from the original reader/writer. The specification may have licence terms that restrict who you can share the spec with, but you don't necessarily need the official spec to come up with a compatible implementation. Plenty of file formats have been reverse engineered over the years even when the original didn't have a written spec.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago
[–] lime@feddit.nu 234 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

fun fact: IBM asked for, and got, an exception from that clause.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I remember when he told that story, it was something like this: one company which I don't want to name, so will just say it's initials - IBM. He also authorised usage for IBM "and it's minions".

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 22 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Well, IIRC they did work with the Nazis to manage concentration camps and more

https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/ibms-role-in-the-holocaust-new-documents-confirm-t

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 54 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Did they reveal what the evil task they were using it for was?

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago

They make chips for missiles.

[–] troybot@midwest.social 25 points 17 hours ago

Knowing IBM, probably something to do with Nazis

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Probably inflicting Websphere on some company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 57 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I guess they'll use JSON when they're building the database to do the next holocaust.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This isn’t talked about enough.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

So do I have to look it up now? Ugh, but I am le tired

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 116 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So do you use JSON for your endpoints?

No we use XML

Oh interesting why is that?

Uhhh.....no reason

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 57 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

Well SOAP is inherently evil so that just makes sense

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

can we please pronounce that evil in a British accent: ivil

load more comments
view more: next ›