376
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 138 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bottom line, if he can’t handle the stresses of a campaign then he can’t handle the stresses of the Presidency and you can bet your life that they’re already plotting to remove him by way of the 25th amendment inside of a year. So this isn’t about Trump anymore, this is about preventing a Vance ~~Presidency~~ Dictatorship.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What stress as president? He just golfs and when pushed for a decision on something, just picks randomly from the options presented. He doesn't even bother understand what the options are. Remember the whole injecting bleach crap? That was him literally glancing at a slide and running with it, obviously with no prior briefing.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Not gonna happen. The 25th Amendment would require a majority of cabinet members to sign off, and Trump will pick them as total loyalists. Trump has control over the party, many of them view him as an infallible prophet. If they haven't turned against him so far, they're not gonna do it later. If Trump gets elected, we're all gonna be along for a ride on the crazy train with him until he dies.

[-] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago

That assumes Trump is a good enough judge of character to be able to tell actual loyalists from sycophants, which I strongly doubt he can.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 100 points 1 week ago

He's suffering from frontotemporal dementia. This is relatively certain. The town hall was classic sundown syndrome. The fundamentalists know this and are going to have him removed from office shortly after the election (if he wins). The democrats would gladly take the opportunity to remove him, as would many republicans. Unfortunately that would put Vance in the oval office which should terrify anyone who doesn't want to larp a handmaid's tale.

As a European I find it utterly bewildering that people seriously consider voting for him. But alas I don't get a say in it.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Dude there's a whole cottage industry here that's dedicated to trying to understand why people vote for him, and the answers are as varied as they are stupid.

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

But how else will podcasters, ring light, and audio equipment manufacturers make a living? Who will hear about FACTOR meals and $40 underwear with neon laser rainbow cats?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That shit was harrowing at the retirement home I worked at. I only worked during the day, so the worst thing I saw was falls. My fiancé's brother worked at night, though. The residents would get stir crazy at night. They'd try to "escape," and they'd be found laying in the nearby hospital's flower bead. This was in NON-assisted living. Trump definitely reminds me of those residents. They'd end up walking to the hospital because it was the only place they knew how to get to, but they didn't know why they were walking there. They just wanted to escape. A lot of them expected their old house/ kid's house.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are fake Bus Stations in front of some Nursery Homes with patients for dementia, because when they escape.... they wait for the Bus.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

If you watched exclusively right-wing media, you would get heavily edited (and mercifully brief) presentations of Trump, along with hours of talking heads playing him up while demonizing Harris (and of course heavily edited presentations of the Democrat). The issue is not with their choice of Trump but with their choices of what media to consume - the latter choices lead quite logically and inevitably to the former choice.

[-] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The best explanation I've come up with after discussing politics at length with them is that they are gaslit. Pure and simple. They just have enough gullibility to see one tiny thing that coincides with something they were taught or otherwise believe. It also explains why they are being scammed so easily on truthsocial.

Trump just has that dirty salesman skill of creating a story with just enough validity or truth and twisting everything to his favor.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago

Remember: the presidency ages people. How long would he be president?

Oddly, this is something that didn't seem to happen to Trump. We all know why of course, he didn't actually do the job of being President.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

Because he doesn't actually do any work, and only worries about himself.

In contrast, presidents like Obama and Biden age quickly because they're actually working nonstop, and stressing out about world events.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

That’s why he’s aging so fast right now… he’s working really hard to try and stay out of prison!

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Donald did no work. He only watched TV, golfed, held rallies. He spent more time on the toilet producing whatever it was that took so many flushes than he did on the job.

Donald aged quickly afterwards and especially after the start of his court cases for the numerous crimes.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 79 points 1 week ago

I went and checked the source: https://bongino.com/ep-2353-live-with-president-donald-trump

He sits down at timestamp 33:34 and says that remark at timestamp 1:09:12. So he was there for 35 minutes.

The characterisation "a few minutes into their discussion" seems disingenuous.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Raw Story may be on the same side as us but they are still complete trash. Headline is often a straight-up lie.

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 20 points 1 week ago

35 minutes doesn't seem very long for an interview. Is expecting the presidential candidate to remain lucid and coherent for slightly more than a half hour too much to ask?

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 week ago

No no, that's not what I'm saying. Just that there's no need to over dramatise the events in a way that makes your point shakier than it has to be.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

This entire article is sensationalized. Bongino doesn't even really seem phased when trump says he's gotta go.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 58 points 1 week ago

Among the bizarre topics Trump discussed was his empathy for former producer Harvey Weinstein, saying that he was treated badly after being found guilty on one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault in New York.

He recognizes fellow travelers. Creep.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

According to Trump, Weinstein got “schlonged. ... He got hit as hard as you can get hit."

I uhh.. don’t think that’s what that word means..

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 40 points 1 week ago

I won't be sad when this shit stain is gone from public life.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

I will be extremely sad if he leaves us with President Vance.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I just hope he doesn’t manage to run out the clock before facing consequences.

I wouldn’t bet on it, but I do hope for it.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 week ago

I really hate that the only people reporting anything like this are sites like rawstory and dailybeast. Meanwhile, NYT and NPR are reporting on how Kamala is testy and Trump is friendly.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah. Seems that she's "emotional", unlike Trump. Think that people are probably projecting their misogyny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

"Among the bizarre topics Trump discussed was his empathy for former producer Harvey Weinstein, saying that he was treated badly after being found guilty on one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault in New York."

From the clip it's hard to get context, but it sounds more like he was saying things that were too crazy for his handlers.

[-] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Article says "'They're going crazy,' Trump said, pointing off camera." Which I think further strengthens your argument.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

They were desperately trying to get him to not defend Weinstein. Probably trying to avoid him lighting the fuse on his own October surprise

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

This is a narcissistic and delusional old man who has never really participated in society as a normal human being. When he says "they", he literally thinks there is a shadow group of people doing this. The fact that someone rich got caught committing crimes and was found guilty by "normies" is all just a part of the shadow group's plan to allow such things to happen. He literally believes "they" could have stopped that from happening IF they wanted to, but decided not to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 week ago

Don't you think he looks tired

[-] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I feel like the Democrats ought to be pivoting towards attacking Vance at this point. The possibility of Trump kicking the bucket from natural causes and the GOP getting a sympathy (/conspiracy-theorist) bounce in the votes this late would be devastating, so they ought to be pulling out all the stops to anticipate and mitigate that before it happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] figaro 14 points 1 week ago

So I just watched the clip. Granted the clip was only a few seconds, and yes I believe he is old and senile. But.

The clip doesn't seem to give evidence of anything specific. He might have to pee for all we know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Probably pooped his pants lol

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

I have never wanted a month to go by as much as I do right now

Americans are really starting to annoy me at this point

We are slowly destroying ourselves with global warming but all we're centring our attention on is on how 400 million people can't decide between a sane young politician or an elderly sociopath with fascist leanings to lead their country.

We're screwed as a species

[-] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Like it or not, the US presidential election has potentially dire worldwide consequences for global warming. If you think our attention is best spent on global warming -- and I would agree -- then paying attention to the election is that.

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah don't blame this shit on all of us, it's like 1/3rd of the population being morons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Happening all over the planet, unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago

Is Trump okay?

Is the sky red?

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Absolutely! As long as you wear our patented Swiss-made* MAGA-colored glasses, of course. Starting price $999.99.

*Product not made anywhere. If you visit our LLC's location, please do not be alarmed that it's just a Starbucks. Enjoy a coffee, on you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

his ass was probably burning from sitting in his shitfilled diaper that long

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

Betteridge's law of headlines. No, he's not ok. And any sane, observant person has known this for a long time.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
376 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3817 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS