73

In terms of gameplay mechanics, old school zoom aiming achieves the same thing as ADS. Is getting to press your nose against virtual firearms really that important in a game about shooting werevolves and vampires?

I blame this on the proliferation of Call of Duty over traditional scifi and fantasy shooter franchises. You can fucking ADS on an assault rifle in Halo now visible-disgust

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 45 points 3 weeks ago

Using my mouse and keyboard as I walk sideways across the balcony, I hold control key to mantle over the ledge before firing my weapon at the other players, a cool drink in arm's reach, the temperature a steady 72°F and comfortable humidity. The smell of a dinner preparing in my nostrils.

"This is about accuracy in gaming, something I take very seriously as a weapons expert," I state plainly.

"Who are you talking to?" my older sister asks, looking through the doorway. Her brow is furrowed.

"His name is ViperKing33 and he's basically a real commando in real life. He is an expert marksman and builds his own weapons."

ViperKing33 later asks if I've seen my sister's boobs before going offline to help his dad with the trash.

[-] Satanic_Mills@hexbear.net 41 points 3 weeks ago

Can't hear their complaints over the sound of me jamming clips into my silenced dual wield Assault Rifle 15s that I fire while sliding.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

Laughs in boomer shooter meemaw

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Realism in games? Retvrn to Goldeneye where if you had 2 guns the brass flew out of the opposite side on your second gun because the devs just mirrored the models and animations and we liked it that way.

started-blasting

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

aiming down sights? oh, you mean when my eyes develop a massive red crosshair in the centre of my vision and i can actually look up and down?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Gun owners and enthusiasts are extremely annoying. Every time a gun is shown, you get a bunch of annoying people virtue signaling about le trigger finger and le magazine NOT CLIP!!

And they’re not anal about the gameplay mechanics. They’re anal about the animation details which shows the character having a normie understanding of firearm technique.

Anyway, not even Tarkov is as realistic. I’d say ARMA, Project Reality, and Squad are because the player holds the gun right in front of them at a lowered position rather than to the side like most FPS games.

[-] Inui@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago

Taking away people's guns because you want to weaken the proletariat

Taking away people's guns because gun owners are also treat brained and annoying on the internet

[-] chickentendrils@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

That's basically where I'm at. Got some crazy stuff but I've never bemoaned realism in shooters, maybe with a rare exception for something billed for that like ARMA/Operation Flashpoint or Receiver where the whole point was that it's actual gunplay.

[-] Inui@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair you'll find the same thing with HEMA people hyperfocusing on sword handling techniques and stuff too. Every game that doesnt have you holding the sword by the blade and using the thing like an axe is a failure. Unfortunately they also tend to get racist and sexist a lot quicker.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Okay but consider; actual longsword is fast, elegant, and looks awesome, and games would be much cooler if they actually incorporated elements of that in to stylized game combat.

Plus it's called "murder-bash" and it looks totally awesome so why not put it in the game?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Arma (and helldivers 2) is fun because the bullets come from the barrel of your weapon instead of the center of the camera. Doesn't matter where the weapon is pointed, so bullets can do zany things if you fire while running, or are firing when you get shot or stunned.

[-] LeylaLove@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'd say Call of Duty is quite realistic having people in the US military with their guns constantly right in front of them

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 35 points 3 weeks ago

If you know how to aim irons, especially illumated irons, work very well in games. Plus it looks visually neat, it more clearly distinguishes between hip fire and ads, and it's more diegetically integrated, you're looking at something that exists in the game and not a cross hair.

For a horror game irons can also restrict your fov and already limited peripheral vision, increasing the tension when you need to shoot accurately but also keep track of things aroiund you.

If the game wants you to be a cool special agent "are you a bad enough dude to save the president" then shooting accurate and effectively is what bad special agent dudes do.

It's not going to make the game worse, but it is nice to have.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

are you a bad enough dude to save the president

no!

[-] edge@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Especially since the president at the time was Ronald Reagan.

Imagine if the game was about infiltrating the kidnappers just to kill him.

"Are you a bad enough dude to [redacted] the president?"

[-] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

I'm such a bad dude that I failed at being a dude and became a trans girl about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, agreed. I know fuck all about guns but well-implemented iron sights can be a blast, it just feels nice. Same with recoil on a more punchy weapon, or good sounds for the guns. Sure you could strip these "unnecessary" features, and keep the mechanics of how the bullets fly the same, but it is cooler with them

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago

c/badposting is where this belongs. I am sorry you decided to be so passionately wrong on the issue of ironsights.

[-] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

correct, they are even wrong about Halo, even modern Halo games (4, 5, Infinite) do literally this exact kind of 'zoom-in' no-ironsights aiming. i WISH halo had ironsights, but the halo assault rifle literally does not have any sights to use, it is a sci fi gun linked to ur helmet (i wish we could use a guncam to shoot over cover)

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

I'm indifferent to iron sights but I don't think they're necessary at all if you're not going for extreme realism (or modern warfare gunwank). It's silly to me that some people are counting lack of ADS as a flaw that needs to be fixed

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

If a weapon has ironsights in a game you should be able to use them. Simple as.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago

Call me old but I prefer the old firing from the hip approach of older games. Iron sights tend to take up the entire screen, like the shooter is pressing it right up against their eye for some scope bite.

Hell I enjoy old shooters like Rainbow Six and SWAT 3 which don't even have gun models.

[-] Esoteir@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

100-com

genuinely this, the advent of universal ADS in the FPS genre has made games slower, movement to get closer to your target has been disincentivized, replaced with aiming down long corridors with zoomed in FOV. I think it mostly became this way because of the popular surge of console gaming, holding LT to ADS essentially becomes a "AUTOAIM, ONLINE!" button, and it standardizes switching between two aiming speeds with non-ADS being fast, and ADS being slow and accurate, whereas on a mouse you can instantly switch between fast and slow aim speeds a lot easier by changing how much you move your arm

i think they have their place in a few niche games like rainbow six to incentivize moving slower in combat encounters to make the defenses you place down more of a mechanical benefit, but even in that game in like a month tops people were just running into bases and quickscoping everyone to get around the ADS movement speed drawbacks so like lol, lmao

plus i liked when the gimmick of sniper rifle weapons in games were that they were the only guns that could zoom your screen in, it made them feel unique and powerful

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I think sights work best in games where you're engaging targets at a longer range, say like ARMA, where you can also adjust them to based on range (I think or maybe a mod did that). Corridor shooters or games with a focus on CQB feel snappier when it's firing from the hip.

[-] Gucci_Minh@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

If they want iron sight realism they need to go all the way and make diopter sights actually usable, i.e. the ring goes out of focus and you get a nice aperture on the front post, instead of how it usually works which is a giant black disc blocks 90% of your screen and you get a tiny dot in the middle to aim through.

Same with notch and post sights, no, it's not just a black rectangle that blocks half your field of view.

[-] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

genuinely this, the advent of universal ADS in the FPS genre has made games slower, movement to get closer to your target has been disincentivized, replaced with aiming down long corridors with zoomed in FOV

What? The distinction between something being plodding and careful or twitchy and fast paced is the available movement tech and how janky a game's hitboxes get when people spam crouch and wiggle back and forth to make them harder to laser down. ADS or its absence is just a style and feel thing at that point.

Like games like Apex and D2 are twitchy and movement focused despite having ADS and generous controller autoaim.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

This is the freeze-gamer equivalent of those insufferable “drums are never animated correctly” videos. If the gameplay is engaging and fun, I don’t care if the serial number on the gun you can see for three frames doesn’t match the numbering system that manufacturer uses.

[-] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

Drummers can move faster than 20fps who knew?

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

DAE LE TRIGGER DISCIPLINE

DAE LE MAGAZINE

It's just another "man card renewal" ritual done by insecure reddit-logo types.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Rare UlyssesT L.

You can pry my proper ironsights from my cold dead hands. I will go further to say counterstrike 2 is cowardly pandering to esports purists. They should have gone the route of making a better R6 siege without the garbo ubisoft hud shit.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

You can stand by that that all you like, but if you chant it the way reddit-logo also chants "trigger discipline" and "magazine not clip" for tacticool approval points and Le reddit-logo Gold, I'd call that a rare Nakoichi L in return.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Also I appreciate trigger discipline discourse when it comes to little details like in the x files how Mulder has terrible trigger discipline belying his character as sort of a crank while Scully is the consummate professional with her firearm handling.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's fine.

geordi-yes "I feel very strongly about my position regarding this topic when that is the current discussion."

geordi-no sees picture of gun "Heh... guys... TRIGGER DISCIPLINE amirite?" smuglord someone exists somewhere "I bet that civvie calls it a 'clip,' heh." smuglord

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Esoteir@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

common UlyssesT W

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mustGo@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

mental gymnastics comic girl - easy

Click and bullets go in the screen center.

[-] LeylaLove@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

I'm fine with not using the iron sights if there's no further level of aim (counter strike) or if there's not really any iron sights on the guns (Halo). But if you're in a first person game, it feels weird to just zoom in when there are iron sights on the gun that the character would be using. For me, it's about being more immersed in the game play. It's like when you look down and can't see yourself. Yeah it doesn't break the game but it definitely takes you out of it a little bit.

[-] Sulvor@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

I’m a sucker for realistic gun mechanics like Tarkov

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

I laughed when one of the Nazis in Green Room did the "it's a cartridge, not a bullet, the bullet is just the part that flies."

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

Me, when I entered this thread for the first time expecting some noncontroversial freeze-gamer dunking merriment:

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Esoteir@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

if unreal tournament didn't need iron sights, nobody needs iron sights, simple as

think-about-it

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

If I wanted to use iron sights I'd play pavlov be

If I'm using a mous and keyboard, please let me bunny hop and hip fire like a cracked out demon

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

No, my COD brain need the ironsights in modern games.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] take_five_seconds@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

idc what the upgrade actually is i just want my numbers to go up

little metal thingy on teh back of gun? sure why not it makes one of my lil bars bigger

[-] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

i know ive posted a lot in this thread but i have a rant. generally i think its weird how all shooter games have very similar controls these days, bring back lock on aiming like in old skool SOCOM and PS2 half life and red faction imo. or rather instead of bringing back, come up with new stuff or new spins on old stuff. i'm absolutely exhausted and sick of playing 'COD but x genre' or 'Quake but x genre' games. i think lock-on aiming systems have a lot of potential and might even be closer to real life instinctual aiming in CQB situations. i also think more games should have a difference between 'weapon up' and 'weapon down' postures with implications for mobility and other gameplay systems. the metal gear series touches on some of this but nothing goes as far as i want. like compare how people move in any given FPS or TPS game and then watch a decent war movie like saving private ryan or full metal jacket, and notice how much more agile real people seem. diving and rolling and crawling and running hunched over. clumsy but fluid, not mechanical and floaty or glide-y. we are so so far from having that in any videogame, and im not convinced its purely an issue of controls or input. so many games animate the player characters like they are a drone more than a person or even a physically existing android.

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

How would you make movement that complicated work on a controller/mouse and keyboard unless you turned it into some kind of contextual animated thing

People also tend to like the smooth glidey video game movement. Many turn off any kind of head bobbing because it gives them motion sickness and they find realistic or physics-driven movement clumsy and annoying

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
73 points (98.7% liked)

games

20407 readers
437 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS