966
Front and Backflipping (discuss.tchncs.de)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Denvil@lemmy.one 131 points 3 months ago

John Cartwheel would like a word with both of them

[-] ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

No one gives Tina Tumble credit for starting the whole upside-down-then-not movement

[-] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

We just glossing over the influence of Sammy Somersault? His early work was groundbreaking.

[-] aniki@lemmings.world 13 points 3 months ago

That's because of that grandstanding cunt, Bobby Barrelroll.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago

John Cartwheel couldn't do what he did without AElfred Rüning being the first person to figure out how to run in the early 9th century.

YOU try doing a Cartwheel without Running first.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Sure, ignore the foundational findings of Magnus Skïpping and Toliver Hops. Might as well just say Thomas Walker was useless. What kind of crazy world are we living in that ignores history!

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

A cousin, second removed from Whil Wilson of the Wheeler family.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 74 points 3 months ago

The fact that Google suggests adding reddit to the end of the search term there is something.

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 3 months ago

oh nice catch, i didn't even see that! yeah it's catching on, but maybe also their biggest downfall, because there's a whole lot of shitposting going on there too. I'm always delighted when they return an article from the Onion and present it as a fact

[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

Once humanity finally realises how bad AI is, can we make meme pages shelters for those poor orphan models?

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

We already know. It's the most obvious thing in the world. Our overlords just don't care.

[-] match@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago

also, it should've been obvious before, right? AI has been around since the 1950s

"History is written by the ~~victors~~ satirists that fooled the mysterious 'answers box'"

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

If that ends up our legacy it would be pretty funny

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 49 points 3 months ago

Pff, everyone knows that Sebastian Somersaült paved the way for all that came after him, back in 1062.

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Marcus Saint Handstaand turned the world in its head in 1060 and nobody every talks about him it's always Sebastian this Sebastian that...

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Marcus Gainer?

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

I'm living the prequel to Idiocracy.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago
[-] NumerousGeorg@sopuli.xyz 37 points 3 months ago

Google should check their sources. I think they are wrong.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

Get your shit together, Jimmy Google.

[-] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I wish they would just let ai always give these silly answers instead of patching them. Ai is dumb as shit but the bullshit answers are often comedy gold. I need these laughs in my life.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

THIS is what "AI" will really be used for. Making bullshit*t.

[-] match@pawb.social 13 points 3 months ago

LLMs are great at their task if you consider they were designed for bullshitting

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It IS stealing our jobs!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

It was funnier when Mitchell and Webb did it.

And also it was funnier because it wasn't something people actually trust to give them the correct answer to something, but rather a sketch comedy radio show.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

I've always assumed many of these are just editting element text, but mobile that seems more effort than worth. Is there a way to quickly confirm them if not using/having access to the feature?

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago

I did a search and got a similar result:

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Tbh I always assumed these AI search results posts were fake. But I just did the search and got the same weird result from TikTok highlighted at the top.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Google really should remove this "feature"

[-] hex@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

This is a different one. The tiktok one is just ripping the text from tiktok, and google has had this feature for yeaaaars. It's just embedding the content on the page.

The one from the OP is real too and that's using this feature called "SearchLabs AI" which is written by AI

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Welp, that's enough for me to assume 80% of these be real lol. Now I feel like I'm missing out, but I don't think I am.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I got exactly the same thing.

AI has no concept of satire, which in my view is a good thing, as it makes people question just how accurate the information being provided really is.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

AI has no concept.

LLMs are nothing more than "spicy autocomplete".

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago
[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We're in the shitpost community, even if it's fake it's still funny?

Being in the EU, i can't check myself, but in the answers someone could reproduce it.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

Sadly it's not fake. Just go do the search on google:

[-] hex@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

This is not the AI result, just an embed from a tiktok post.

[-] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Assuming AI Overview does not cache results, they would be generated at search-time for each user and "search-event" independently. Even recreating the same prompt would not guarantee a similar AI Overview, ~~so there's no way to confirm.~~

Edit: See my comment below for what I actually meant to say

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Multiple people in this thread, including myself, have the exact same tiktok meme quote as results for that prompt.

"AI Overciew" is not the same as randomized image generation.

[-] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

My bad, I wasn't precise enough with what I wanted to say. Of course you can confirm (with astronomically high likelihood) that a screenshot of AI Overview is genuine if you get the same result with the same prompt.

What you can't really do is prove the negative. If someone gets an output then replicating their prompt won't necessarily give you the same output, for a multitude of reasons. e.g. it might take all other things Google knows about you into account, Google might have tweaked something in the last few minutes, the stochasticity of the model is leading to a different output, etc.

Also funny you bring up image generation, where this actually works too in some cases. For example they used the same prompt with multiple different seeds and if there's a cluster of very similar output images, you can surmise that an image looking very close to that was in the training set.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I do that with LLM a fair bit. If just using GPTs website for something that should be simple, I often prompt the same thing several times and choose the best iteration as a base.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MHanak@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Now do you recon: did freddy mercury eat mercury?

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Schools have said forever that not everything you read online is true and NOW AI companies and people are surprised

Newsgroups and BBSs were full of tomfoolery

[-] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago

At this point I have von idea if most of these are faked or not but it’s funny and definitely plausible after the pizza glue.

[-] papaya@possumpat.io 18 points 3 months ago

I opened Google for the first time in three months just to try this lmao

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

It is real and it is glorious.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Thus, challenging someone became known as “fronting.”

[-] Resol@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

There's no way they both named their signature moves after themselves.

I still wonder if whoever invented the bottle flip has "bottle flip" in their name.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

It checks out. They were closely related to John Dark Souls and John Sekiro who were known for their incredible movement abilities - especially the latter

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
966 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26615 readers
3564 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS