Yes exactly! I am still on reddit and I love trying to uploft the OP when people start shitting on them when they are self conscious with their new tattoo.
But tbh I also love browsing the shitty tattoos sub lol.
Yes exactly! I am still on reddit and I love trying to uploft the OP when people start shitting on them when they are self conscious with their new tattoo.
But tbh I also love browsing the shitty tattoos sub lol.
Thank you very much! :)
I love that statement about tattoos too! There are a lot of tattoo subreddits on Reddit and a lot of people on there seem to love to shit on people's tattoos unnecessarily. Lot of people on there critique the most minute details.
Not sure why you randomly decided to come to this community to fear monger lol.
But anyway, instead of a pop-sci piece, I managed to find the original referenced paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.70012
I'll admit I only skimmed it, but what is confusing to me is that they doesn't seem to go into detail what sort of research was involved to determine the tattoo as the cause of the condition described. I don't know that this article really goes into depth enough to discern whether or not the tattoos themselves are the cause, or if the inflamed tattoos are actually a symptom. There are many references to a relationship with sarcoidosis, which is an autoimmune disease. Sarcoidosis itself is not associated with tattoos and has multifactorial causes. It seems to me that in those genetically susceptible, you could hypothesize that the tattoo pigment may play a role in the development of the condition. But it seems like more of an explanation is warranted. But I'll admit it is a long paper so I just did some light skimming.
Oh but I will say it's not totally unheard of for the body's immune response to a particular substance get too "messy" and start attacking other things. It is the case with strep throat sometimes causing heart damage due to a "messy" immune response/overreaction or certain GI bugs causing Guillain Barre syndrome (an autoimmune paralysis disease) from a "messy" immune response/overreaction. So it certainly is plausible. It just doesn't seem to be definitive yet based on my casual reading. I could be wrong. The article describes tattoo excision being associated with remission, BUT that the patients were also systemically treated. So imo sounds like a confounding variable instead of definitive proof. But idk.
One interesting thing is that my job revolves around dissecting human organs. It is interesting to see, but tattoo pigment does travel to and color the nearby lymph nodes in your body. Lymph nodes are part of the immune system and help maintain the balance of fluid between your tissue and your blood vessels. It's neat to see.
Anyway, a curious phenomenon that I hadn't heard of. I can't say I feel at all alarmed if that was your goal lol.
I have heard the biggest risk of the surgery is basically "permanent" dry eyes. Might not sound like a big deal but to me it sounds like torture.
Is this a new copypasta?
I see this propagated on the internet, but I get curious on whether or not it's actually true or something that someone made up and got telephoned around the world.
What's the relation of this gif in your post to the static photo? It's this an ad in the Duolingo app or something? It's hard to make the connection to that. And this part of the gif is small and in the corner. All you need next time is a bit more of a description!
I clicked on the post instead of scrolling by and I am still incredibly confused.
Sadly mine doesn't seem to work properly. Nothing in that region does.
Me irl.

Your comment made me laugh because it's only a picture of my arm lol. I'm glad you are imagining that bahaha.