Yeah that's what I've been thinking about really. Problem is idk that there's anything I really want to put there.
Idk now I'm second guessing...maybe quail?
Yeah I wasn't initially planning an arm sleeve. I plan to eventually go into a single patchwork leg sleeve, though! Same side as shoulder.
To be real, I think at least in the US, tattoos in more odd, visible locations are becoming more accepted. They don't seem to be the total job stoppers they once were. They still most definitely are for many jobs, but not as many as they once were. One of my coworkers has some flowers up the side of her neck and I think it's very pretty. Not my bag at all, but some of these can be very cool.
Thanks, broski. Being a dingus is my favorite past time.
Well I was actually going to do this one but larger to spread across my entire face. Thoughts???

Your comment made me laugh because it's only a picture of my arm lol. I'm glad you are imagining that bahaha.
Yes exactly! I am still on reddit and I love trying to uploft the OP when people start shitting on them when they are self conscious with their new tattoo.
But tbh I also love browsing the shitty tattoos sub lol.
Thank you very much! :)
I love that statement about tattoos too! There are a lot of tattoo subreddits on Reddit and a lot of people on there seem to love to shit on people's tattoos unnecessarily. Lot of people on there critique the most minute details.
Not sure why you randomly decided to come to this community to fear monger lol.
But anyway, instead of a pop-sci piece, I managed to find the original referenced paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.70012
I'll admit I only skimmed it, but what is confusing to me is that they doesn't seem to go into detail what sort of research was involved to determine the tattoo as the cause of the condition described. I don't know that this article really goes into depth enough to discern whether or not the tattoos themselves are the cause, or if the inflamed tattoos are actually a symptom. There are many references to a relationship with sarcoidosis, which is an autoimmune disease. Sarcoidosis itself is not associated with tattoos and has multifactorial causes. It seems to me that in those genetically susceptible, you could hypothesize that the tattoo pigment may play a role in the development of the condition. But it seems like more of an explanation is warranted. But I'll admit it is a long paper so I just did some light skimming.
Oh but I will say it's not totally unheard of for the body's immune response to a particular substance get too "messy" and start attacking other things. It is the case with strep throat sometimes causing heart damage due to a "messy" immune response/overreaction or certain GI bugs causing Guillain Barre syndrome (an autoimmune paralysis disease) from a "messy" immune response/overreaction. So it certainly is plausible. It just doesn't seem to be definitive yet based on my casual reading. I could be wrong. The article describes tattoo excision being associated with remission, BUT that the patients were also systemically treated. So imo sounds like a confounding variable instead of definitive proof. But idk.
One interesting thing is that my job revolves around dissecting human organs. It is interesting to see, but tattoo pigment does travel to and color the nearby lymph nodes in your body. Lymph nodes are part of the immune system and help maintain the balance of fluid between your tissue and your blood vessels. It's neat to see.
Anyway, a curious phenomenon that I hadn't heard of. I can't say I feel at all alarmed if that was your goal lol.

That's super awesome that you've built it up like that over time! My idea was to start going for patchwork on my leg and be done with my arms, really.