this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
941 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
1457 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 79 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Some of us left it behind quite awhile ago:-).

img

img

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 43 points 5 months ago (19 children)

The problem is that a fuckton of the web is SEO poisoned, so even a better search engine will find garbage because for a lot of subjects garbage is all that’s available.

The best chef in the world can’t turn shit into anything you want to eat.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

This is what they want you to think but they're hardly even trying. Google is shitty on purpose because if initial search results are bad, you "engage" more and see more ads. And since they're not worried about competition because google is the default search nearly everywhere -- most people don't even know there are alternatives, google is synonymous with search -- they can enshittify their search as much as they want. https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/04/teach-me-how-to-shruggie/ https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

[–] pukeko@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

That's what I enjoy about kagi: because I can block and rank sources, I get to do some reverse-SEO, and the results are really good with remarkably few adjustments.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not just Bing. They added an animal mascot. :-D

[–] Forester@yiffit.net 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Explains why it so good for finding porn

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tbf, it's not hard to find porn on the internet:-D.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago

Sometimes it’s hard

See, you found a phrase that you could use to get you started already!?:-P

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

In terms of results, yes. But at least there's no ads, nor sponsored results, nor bloody AI crap.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Please explain

Nice. Downvoted for asking for more information.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's powered by Bing. That's all. Compare DDG results with a private Bing session.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So, it uses Bing to some extent, I'll take that. But it's not entirely Bing.

Even if a large part of DDG relies on Bing doesn't mean they are the same. That's an oversimplification at least.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (8 children)

To a great extent. To the point that search results are identical.

Since the entire topic is about the quality of results, the comparison is quite valid.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] onion@feddit.de 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Also Quant, Ecosia, Startpage

[–] Negligent_Embassy@links.hackliberty.org 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do you like about those over searx?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I love searx but it's slow 🙁

[–] Negligent_Embassy@links.hackliberty.org 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Apologies if you already know this but there are tons of different instances of searx hosted by different people.

It's possible the speed issue is related to the specific instance you tried, do you remember what it was?

Here is the list of all them: https://searx.space/

As I type this I realize I'm probably just not sensitive to slowness since I use tor for all my browsing lol

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I self-hosted it, and used it for years and liked it. But the results take 3, 4, 5 seconds to come in as you wait for it to run the search on all the different engines. I just tested searx.be above and found the same thing.

When I use any other search engine, I get results in half a second or less. I know it's only a few seconds but it's definitely noticeable when you use a different search engine.

I see, sorry for the assumption.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is precisely why I don't use searx.
I just want to quickly find shit, not maintain a list of instances that all have slightly different functionality and frontends.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Qwant is the best one by far, imo

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Go ahead and find a free Google alternative that doesn't.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i think so, but the results are in any case mostly okay in my experience, and they have an AI feature that ACTUALLY WORKS since it just summarizes relevant parts of wikipedia articles and links you to the precise sections it used.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, but I use it over Bing because Bing filters most of its news articles through MSN and then pressures you to download the app. Either way, both are giving me better results than Google at this point.

[–] Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago

Oh fuck!

Looks like you can turn it off though - https://duckduckgo.com/settings#aifeatures.

load more comments (7 replies)