134
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 61 points 4 months ago

i-think-that porn sucks and I hate how pervasive it is in our society, especially on the internet. Any positive thing gets compared to porn, "foodporn", "map porn", etc., idk call me puritanical but I just find it gross.

Also, I'm too young to know the answer to this, but what effect do we think internet porn has had on spawning a generation of incels? Idk what the pre-porn incel market was like.

Sex is great, intimacy is wonderful, but I don't like porn.

Doesn't mean it should be illegal tho

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 62 points 4 months ago

porn didn't create any incels, people who have no sex education or 'visualisation' still have the social expectations of patriarchy. 'internet porn' largely coincides with the long-run alienation trends of the last decades, it's a relatively unimportant part compared to economic outlooks and social isolation.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago

Good distinction, I think porn hones incels rather than creates them

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago

idk, historically the alternatives might have been worse; would the 'incel' archetype be more likely to be violent with more available prostitution? it's easy to imagine the stewing that goes on in shut-in incel's minds but before we had as widespread porn, seeking out transactional sexual gratification would involve them interfacing vulnerable laborers.

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also, I’m too young to know the answer to this, but what effect do we think internet porn has had on spawning a generation of incels?

Some effect, but likely a negligible one. Most dudes of childrearing age, cause I'm not gonna sit here and act like they're all fathers even if they sired a child-- most dudes won't cop to it, but Gen Xers and boomers are where this started. They taught their boys a very specific way that offshot of the way they acted, even if what they SAID ran contrary. It's what their fathers did that these incels want to emulate, not what they said.

I'm speaking from personal experience here; because I was once very much the same way. One bad relationship with a cheat had me misogynistic as fuck at one point in my life; and what I fell back on was all of the maladaptive, machismo-type bullshit my father lived by. "Never let a hoe fuck with your money", "never trust a hoe with your feelings", the whole nine-- and this experience is what kind of. I might verbally john on incels every so often, but I consider it genuinely tragic because they were maladaptively socialized for a society that is quite literally disintegrating in real time.

tl;dr I think it might tweak the dynamics of the incel/manosphere, but not in a way that'd undo the phenomenon. If anything, you're gonna see more Andrew Tate-alikes who talk about porn and masturbation being mentally or spiritually crippling, but still keep up all the regressive misogyny if not stronger because dollars-to-donuts says they'll just default to "blame women" for why the porn is gone. (Despite all their slagging of OnlyFans models.)

[-] Ossay@hexbear.net 26 points 4 months ago

just watching movies from the 80s and 90s is enough to see how incel-type behaviour not only existed, but was somewhat normalized as "romantic protagonist" behaviour

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago

You could probably argue that what makes the incel is the rupture from the rest of society not accepting that behavior from all men. The friction between men who want the benefits of the patriarchy without the downsides, and the rest of everyone, including those who want the end of the patriarchy as well as those who are okay with the status quo, is what creates incels as a specific group.

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

NoFap is already a reactionary thing and basically General Ripper from Dr. Strangelove except unironic.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

I don't think it's a gen x or boomer thing, I think there have always been men we'd now identify as incels in patriarchal society, as it's the logical end point of male sexual entitlement. The way we describe them has changed, but ideas like women not being able to be trusted with money or men not showing their feelings go back hundreds, if not thousands of years. I think what's really changed is the internet has given those people somewhere to gather and jerk themselves off about how unfair it is, intensifying their persecution complexes and causing them to act out more.

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don’t think it’s a gen x or boomer thing, I think there have always been men we’d now identify as incels in patriarchal society, as it’s the logical end point of male sexual entitlement.

This is a pretty good macro-level way to look at it, I'm just trying to keep my lens fixed to recent history, y'know, likening/affixing the concept to 'sources' (even if not primary sources) that we all know and can identify immediately in our orbits. It's absolutely the logical endpoint, but to me, at the point where it affects us all, I see it all starts again with each man that COULD have broken that cycle, but couldn't even be incentivized to.

Cause there WERE some that actually tried NOT to; I've seen them, I've met them, but I've also seen their kids just totally go sides-up from proper teaching and acting to sink into this incel shit because of the crowd the kid keeps-- and the cycle in their bloodline starts again with the kid that went sideways, y'know?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] axont@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago

The prevalence of the male incel identity coincides with sexual harassment becoming less socially acceptable.

That's the main part of it. It's the shadow of lingering social misogyny trying to reassert itself through the very real phemenons of alienation and loneliness.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago

Doesn’t mean it should be illegal tho

I would at least ban porn networks, since they are nothing more than socially accepted pimping.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also, I'm too young to know the answer to this, but what effect do we think internet porn has had on spawning a generation of incels? Idk what the pre-porn incel market was like.

idk, I think it's hard to separate the effects of internet porn from the effects of the internet in general. i think regular ol' internet forums (some of which host porn but not necessarily as the main focus) are the biggest factor in the proliferation of "incel" mindsets / identities. you know, before the internet if you were somebody who can't get laid, you'd maybe talk to your friends about it and get encouragement or advice, or talk to family, or just be sad basically. the chances of you independently coming to the conclusion that there's something about you that makes you completely unlovable (maybe even to absurdly specific degrees, such as that you will never be able to get laid because your wrists are too narrow) and that the problem will never ever get better and that all women are unthinking evil creatures who want unlovable men like you to die so they never have to be reminded that anyone but gigachad exists... are pretty slim. nobody comes up with those kinds of ideas on their own, that requires insular groups that take time feeding each other's frustrations and insecurities and slowly building up a mythology. if you dont have access to the internet, you're going to have to discuss your difficult love life with someone who can get laid. but incel internet forums provide an extremely unhealthy outlet for those frustrations that don't involve ever talking to someone who can get laid.

I also don't think internet porn is significantly more harmful than the good ol' magazines and VHS tapes and whatever that we had before. though, one way in that it is obviously more harmful is in the sheer availability. if you've got a dirty magazine you've got, you know, one magazine of porn. if you've got a smartphone you've got more porn than you could ever desire to look at in a hundred lifetimes. and if you're a kid, you at least have to hide a dirty magazine. teens these days have basically no risk of being caught being addicted to (even extremely niche) pornography. i think that's gonna be the biggest effect of internet porn for the next few generations. when millennials (and anyone older) were growing up, their experience with porn, if any, was maybe a few dirty magazines where they could look at some tits. now kids are growing up totally addicted to enormous amounts of wild, hardcore porn.

i generally agree with you that porn is bad. by volume, anyway. like 99.999% of all porn is bad for a wide variety of reasons. I think it's possible to make porn ethically. Very difficult unless there are no humans involved (like with drawings or pure writing), and even then it's still possible to do it unethically (sexualizing children still sucks even if there are no real kids involved, for example)

I do think that the 99.999% of porn I'm talking about should be illegal, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] laziestflagellant@hexbear.net 45 points 4 months ago

Damn that's crazy.

But imagine for a second that we had an internet where credit card handlers and big tech companies were the deciding factor if NSFW content could be allowed on an internet platform and they started hammering down on any website big enough in order to block pornographic or illustrated erotic content on them. That would be horrible. Thank god Biden won't let that happen

wait hold on a second I'm being informed that--

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 45 points 4 months ago

Isn't this also how they're going to criminalise being LGBTQ online? Ban porn and also define being visibly not straight as inherently pornographic?

Don't they also talk about death penalties for child abuse, ie the endpoint of all the frothing at the mouth about every LGBTQ person being a groomer?

lol coomers or whatever but this shit is pretty spooky

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

This is the actual end goal. Force the entire LGBT community into the closet.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sorry but in a communist world, porn would be done away with nobody would have to sell their body or their body-having-sex-as-content in order to put food on the table, pay rent, etc. You gotta really consider how many people in that industry are exhibitionist, how many are escaping bad situations at home, or are groomed by society to see this as an acceptable form of labor, or are being exploited in destructive manners with zero recourse, no better than forced labor. Hypersexuality in teenagers and adults can be a response to domestic violence and abuse, it can be a dissociative way of dealing with unpleasant feelings and stress, and porn consumption, and production can take advantage of that; it also makes it difficult to distinguish between puberty driven desires and societal pressure. Porn can also be the end result of trafficking like European, and specifically Eastern European pornographic rings that are the source of human trafficking.

Feminists have been debating about the inherent oppressive conditions of sex under a patriarchal and capitalist world. We have to include that into the analysis of the pornographic industry. If the industry was to be tolerated, it would have to be with stringent measures for entry, licensing, testing, and performance procedures that would basically legislate it out of existence.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, an exceptionally high percentage of sex workers today are wage slaves and worse, coercion is the norm today. But to reduce all porn production to 'unacceptable labor' is not a reasonable conclusion either.

Free of financial coercion, some non-negligible amount of people would still choose to do sex work. Sexuality is a normal, healthy, human trait, and there are plenty healthy ways to engage with it.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago

we don't live in a communist world and the movement to legislate-it-out-of-existence from the right without solving any of the economic/social cleavages that put people into sex work is just going to escalate the criminal character & make it more dangerous for workers

i think in the idyllic after-the-revolution there wouldn't even be a demand for porn production: with the elimination of IP, just go around and obtain consent forms from whichever former performers don't mind it being out there, & there'd instantly be a huger library of available pornography than anyone could countenance under capitalism. the industry thrives on artificial scarcity and ephemeral availability, but there's nothing fundamentally new

[-] Angel@hexbear.net 32 points 4 months ago

This is how I see it. The best outlook to end the adult entertainment industry's abuses isn't "ban porn," but rather, it's "make it redundant by ensuring basic human rights so people do not feel a need to go down that route."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

But would a communist utopia have horny fanart of Sonic the Hedgehog

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

It's funny, cause I actually legitimately wonder about this sort of thing. A shocking amount of people write/draw NSFW stuff not out of any kind of profit motive, but just because they want to.

[-] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago

I guess when people here equate porn with the "adult entertainment industry" but there's a whole vast ocean of porn beyond adult films

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dead@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A lot of "x wouldn't exist under communism discourse" seems to stem from x thing being a modern invention. Communist writers didn't write about porn because filmed porn didn't really exist until the late 1960s. Movies and television as we know it didn't exist before the late 1960s either.

What you wrote also applies to acting and film making in general. You could substitute "pornography" with "movies and television" and it would be effectively just as true. Are there actors who don't like to act but do it anyways because they are promised fame and fortune? Do people who have suffered traumatic events watch films and television to dissociate from their lives? Have the producers of hollywood movies and television engaged in acts of human trafficking? Have feminists debated the inherent oppressive conditions of film production, acting, television and movies under a patriarchal and capitalist world? The answer to all of these questions is yes but we wouldn't say that communism will legislate movies and television out of existence.

[-] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

more right than you think because the correct view is that most of american culture and media, like porn, is a societal ill and has a net effect of harm. i think your direct comparison is a bit vulgar though

[-] dead@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To clarify, my point is that the exploitative conditions exist in all forms of media creation under capitalism. Analysis is not justification. The point is to remove the exploitative elements from media creation. Which is not only accomplished through regulation, but more importantly through restructuring the modes of production by eliminating the existence of profit.

I don't think that people will stop filming sex during communism, just as I don't think that people will stop making films or television. I do think people will probably watch any media less however because people tend to over consume all type of media under capitalism as a form of escapism.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 40 points 4 months ago

doubt

Democrats have been on board with bans on porn for the most part. Both parties are morality police under the guise of "protect the kids".

Love that PornHub just isn't able to load in several states without a VPN.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 39 points 4 months ago

This! This will happen the next time a Republican POTUS gets elected. Project 2025 will most definitely turn into 2029 which will turn into 2033 and so and so on. Which I’m begging Dems to whip up their own Project 2025 to make sure that other one doesn’t happen.

If the Democrats did a project 2025, it would either not exist or be near identical to the Republican one lmao

[-] hexinvictus@hexbear.net 39 points 4 months ago

Project 2025 will most definitely turn into 2029 which will turn into 2033 and so and so on.

Just keep voting blue guys. Don't worry about the genocide, police brutality, asylum ban, banning apps because people on it support Palestine etc. No matter how bad Biden is, project 2025+4+4+4+4+4 is worse

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 38 points 4 months ago

This other party is an existential threat, but our best bet at defeating them is to just keep hitting the snooze button.

[-] btfod@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

I'm gonna start using this, thanks comrade

[-] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's so convenient that they found a way to shift off of "trump bad".

When people like us confronted them with "what will you screech about once trump is dead?" They found the perfect boogyman. A nebulous collection of ideas the Republicans have been open about for 50+ years. At least this one has a cute name!

I guess on the one hand, this is closer to how messaging should work, but alas, they will just scaremonger and fundraise off it until we slow walk into fascism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This! This will happen

Oh look, a reddit-logo user

visible-disgust

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

You can tell because they've been trying to scare everybody with project 2025 for a year but if you ask them what their plan is if they win they'll just look at you confused and say they aren't Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 39 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What are we, a bunch of ~~asians~~ ~~muslism~~ asians??

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 36 points 4 months ago

I like Madeline Pendleton’s take on Project 2025. It’s just everything The Heritage Foundation has been pushing for for decades, but most people don’t know about The Heritage Foundation, so it seems like it’s out of nowhere. It’s nothing out of the ordinary or special for Republicans.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 36 points 4 months ago

monke-beepboop tfw no porn on the internet

monke-return the box of porn in the woods beckons

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago

If you start believing in them the porn fae will return to the mortal realm and leave a copy of juggs in the woods.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago

Go ahead and ban it, I already got plans drawn up for porn speakeasies with private booths for gooners to goon all day in. Going to be $69 an hour, I'm going to be fucking rich and it'll be perfect.

[-] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

I'll be your most loyal customer — I've got a thing for getting fucked in every way, including financially!

/altjoke A "porn speakeasy"? Surely that would be a "moaneasy", right?

[-] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

Once again, Republican states are already doing this and Biden has done nothing about it,

[-] Nero@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago

without access to pornography i wouldve never discovered the joy of prostate stimulation, so it must be a moral good

[-] 0x0520@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago

~~Ridin'~~ Goonin' with Biden

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah man lemme just turn into a fucking nazi and endorse genocide because you're worried you won't be allowed to honk off otherwise

God I hate it when the astroturf says "yall".

[-] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

Time to get really good at drawing, so I can bootleg some porn to sell to these people

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

No no no you see porn is an accessibility tool for people with aphantasia, everyone else can just fantasize but but but what about the poor people who cannot visualize mental imagery at all, we have to let them get off too right

[-] GladimirLenin@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

Givin' my cock a hidin' for Biden freedom-and-democracy

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15910 readers
327 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS