this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
250 points (94.0% liked)

Science Memes

17417 readers
1675 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unironically yes. Gravity is the weakest of the 4 main forces.

[–] SrTobi@feddit.de 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] reinei@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

And then you start winning nobel prizes!

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah

The electrostatic force is why the ocean stays on the outside of the ball instead of the whole thing being consolidated into a black hole

[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

instead of the whole thing being consolidated into a black hole

How does that work?

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago

I think it keeps atoms apart.

[–] Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 years ago

Gravity wants to make the atoms touch and the subatomic particles touch too. ESF says nuh uh and pushes them apart, so atoms are >99% empty space. If the forces flipped the Earth would contract into a spheroid much smaller than the moon.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You know, No Game No Life, where the guy deletes Coulomb Force at the end of the word puzzle game?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry this level of brain broken will never not be funny

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 25 points 2 years ago

So, Gravity is so strong it can hold down the ocean, but balloon still go up? Checkmate, Pythagoras. /s

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Physics teacher: "The electrical force that repels the bottom of your foot from the surface of the earth is greater than the gravitational attraction between the entire earth and yourself".

Me: 😲

Edit: I guess it's more correct to say "equal to", rather than "greater" since you're static.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago

If it weren't true you would be experiencing a net acceleration due to the imbalance in the forces acting on you.

What's really interesting is figuring out WHY mechanistically it's true. I had to rethink the whole thing this morning, because it really is pretty nuts how much weaker gravity is than the electrostatic force.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 16 points 2 years ago

Gravity strong, but static charge stronger.

gravity is cringe (compared to the electro-weak and strong forces)

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] montechristo@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And steel is heavier than feathers.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Jet fuel can't melt steel feathers

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
[–] flan@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

if gravity was 33 orders of magnitude stronger we'd be having a bad time right now

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago

...but our quads and glutes would be stonking.

[–] lrnz92@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's more or less the premise for Stephen Baxter's book Raft

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I think that I read too as being about 25% longer oo sound than in to. And because of that, it is processed as a completely separate word in my head. I never just read over a misuse of to. And it bugs me just how much I’m seeing it now.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

Checkmate liberals