466
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A North Texas man has filed a class action lawsuit against Cinemark, claiming the movie theater chain is lying to customers about the size of its drinks.

Shane Waldrop claims that Cinemark's 24 ounce cups can only hold 22 ounces of liquid, according to the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bell@lemmy.world 242 points 6 months ago

Waldrop took the empty container home and measured how much it could hold, discovering it only held 22 ounces.

I love this guy, totally something I would do

[-] credo@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I like the thought of him picking up the cup at the counter, weighing it in his hand for just a moment, and saying to the ~~kid~~ young adult on the other side, “This feels a little light.”

Edit:I just remembered you had to be 18 to sell beer in Texas.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

"I think it's a half-gram heavy on the back end."

Name that movie.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, Chronicles of Riddick. The sequel to Pitch Black. I misremembered.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Shame on you, mixing up Vin Diesel films.

He's the Humphrey Bogart of our era.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Let's face it Casablanca and XXX are really just the same movie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Chronicles of Riddick. Keep what you kill. Which is weird because he was given that knife and not the body of the guy he stabbed in the head with it.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ooh, John Wick or Resvoir Dogs. Now let me google it.

Lol, way off. Been a while on that one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 146 points 6 months ago

Shrinkflation noobs. Never specify the size of a (pseudo-)prepared product. It's better to use abstract terms like large, extra large, and jumbo that can be shrunk down in size without increasing legal liability down whenever you wish to juice your profits a bit (/s)

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 33 points 6 months ago

The cup itself is labeled 24oz, but it sounds like it can't even fit that much liquid when filled.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

Alcohol is usually held to stricter portion control than other foodstuffs since it's more tightly regulated.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

I canada, it's illegal to call something a pint if it's not 20oz/568mL

But i havent seen a real pint glass at any bar for many years a nobody calls out this behaviour or enforces the rules.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

In the US a pint is 16oz, unless you go to McMenamins in which case it's 14oz.

[-] brianorca@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I thought a pint was 16 oz. Quart is 32oz and gallon 128 oz.

[-] Glimpythegoblin@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

It is in the us. Imperial gallons are bigger than us gallons for some reason.

[-] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Because a unified, standard, and consistent International System of units is BOOOORRRIINNNGGG

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

These are the lawsuits that I want to know more about!

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago

This is capitalism gone too far!!

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

This is what the second amendment is for!

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Scaring them with bear arms?

[-] betheydocrime@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

No, the right to bare arms. Like, you can wear a tank top if you wanna

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

You'll be cold in the movie theater.

[-] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 36 points 6 months ago

Not all heroes wear capes

[-] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 6 months ago

North Texas man sues Cinemark claiming 24-ounce beer cups can't hold 24 ounces

Published April 19, 2024 2:56pm CDT

A North Texas man has filed a class action lawsuit against Cinemark, claiming the movie theater chain is lying to customers about the size of its drinks.

Shane Waldrop claims that Cinemark's 24 ounce cups can only hold 22 ounces of liquid, according to the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

On Feb. 14, Waldrop went to the Cinemark in Grapevine and purchased the 20 ounce and 24 ounce draft beer.

He noticed the 24 ounce cup did not appear to be big enough to hold 4 more ounces of liquid.

Waldrop took the empty container home and measured how much it could hold, discovering it only held 22 ounces.

The cup was marked as a 24 oz cup.

Waldrop and his legal team says the movie theater chain is taking part in "deceptive" and "otherwise improper" business practices that violate state and federal laws about misbranding.

"This is especially misleading because the 24 oz drink should provide a deal for consumers over the 20 oz drink’s price: $0.37 per ounce vs. $0.39 per ounce. But due to the actual volume of 22 oz available in the ‘24 oz’ drink, the price is $0.40 per ounce making the larger drink more expensive per ounce, which is not a deal at all," reads the lawsuit.

The lawsuit says Waldrop brought the suit for himself and "all other persons nationwide."

He is seeking a jury trial.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Interesting! Is it only me or EU users or maybe everyone who's been blocked from their site?

[-] RichieRich@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Yeah, exactly, they don't want EU citizens lurking at there websites. You should use a VPN.

[-] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 months ago

That's probably just because they didn't want to bother becoming GDPR compliant and instead blocked everyone that would have that requirement. Curious if they did anything for California though, since they have similar legislation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Fuck em up Shane!

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

Meanwhile, people at many/most movie theaters in the US:

"You Guys Are Getting Paid" meme with caption "you guys are getting beer in movie theaters?"

[-] DBT@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

This is common at theaters that serve food inside the theater. It’s a restaurant movie theater.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

Foot long subs have a deal for you!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Deello@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I thought they just pour a bottle/can in a cup and call it a day. That's what happened when I bought a buzzball for my wife last week. We weren't expecting a full cup of buzzball but we weren't complaining because we still got a full drink. They literally opened and poured it in front of us and tossed the empty container. I don't remember seeing anything on tap but that could just be my local Cinemark.

[-] chookity@kbin.run 3 points 6 months ago

Florida man has some competition

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
466 points (99.4% liked)

News

23305 readers
3634 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS