If you are not able to rationally argue why we shouldn’t be bigoted, I don’t know what to tell you.

it's not that people can't, but spaces which have unlimited tolerance for sealions suggesting that it's necessary to argue that are likely to have less interesting discussions than spaces which do not 🙄

But don’t call it an anarchist space

tell me you've never been in a non-internet anarchist space without telling me 😂

(hint: offline anarchist bars tend not to tolerate fascists either)

rules of anarchism

😭

(this is a bit, right?)

It’s ironic you state it like this, since we are an explicitly anarchist server ;)

it's not really ironic as i am well aware that you are and i appreciate you for that :)

what i'm saying is that i'm glad that, despite obviously being a (fellow!) proponent of freedom of expression, you haven't fallen victim to the childish line of thought which leads some people to let their spaces become nazi bars. so: thanks!

unmoderated internet spaces are quickly overrun with bigotry, csam, and spam.

if, in the name of "free speech", you only moderate the csam and spam, the space will be primarily occupied by people looking for a forum that welcomes bigotry.

respect to @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com for rm'ing bigotry and not letting childish anarchist free speech ideals cause lemmy.dbzer0.com to be a nazi bar 🥂

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_demand_avoidance

As for the significance of Melania Trump presiding over the Security Council meeting, Dujarric called it “a sign of the importance that the United States feels towards the Security Council and the subject.”

🤔

Ivanka Trump attended the UNGA and had meetings there but did not preside over it.

Also the President of Spain says (firefox translated) "We reject the unilateral military action of the U.S. and Israel, which is an escalation and contributes to a more uncertain and hostile international order." but then goes on to also reject Iran's (unspecified) actions.

Like Finland's it's a pretty tame condemnation, but noteworthy coming from NATO member states.

The President of Finland actually went a little off script

could Red Hat eventually take control of the project

Fedora started in 2002 and merged with "Red Hat Linux" in 2003.

Red Hat, Inc has had full control of it ever since then.

It is a "community project" inasmuch as there are Fedora developers who are volunteers (and some who are paid by companies other than Red Hat), and the Fedora Council includes people who are not employed by Red Hat - but the Project Leader is always a Red Hat employee, and if the Council ever has an irreconcilable difference with Red Hat then Red Hat can simply ignore and/or dismiss them.

Red Hat owns all Fedora-related trademarks, and the Fedora Project is not an independent legal entity: it is a part of Red Hat.

If Fedora developers don't like Red Hat's decisions regarding the project, they can fork it but they'd need to change the name and find some other sources funding.

Also, icymi, Red Hat became a subsidiary of IBM in 2019.