this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
489 points (99.8% liked)

News

37103 readers
1333 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservative fifth circuit overturns EPA’s ban prohibiting Inhance from using manufacturing process creating toxic compound

A federal appeals court in the US has killed a ban on plastic containers contaminated with highly toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” found to leach at alarming levels into food, cosmetics, household cleaners, pesticides and other products across the economy.

Houston-based Inhance manufactures an estimated 200m containers annually with a process that creates, among other chemicals, PFOA, a toxic PFAS compound. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in December prohibited Inhance from using the manufacturing process.

But the conservative fifth circuit court of appeals court overturned the ban. The judges did not deny the containers’ health risks, but said the EPA could not regulate the buckets under the statute it used.

The rule requires companies to alert the EPA if a new industrial process creates hazardous chemicals. Inhance has produced the containers for decades and argued that its process is not new, so it is not subject to the regulations. The EPA argued that it only became aware that Inhance’s process created PFOA in 2020, so it could be regulated as a new use, but the court disagreed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] don@lemm.ee 235 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Conservatives are a blight on humanity.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Louder for those in the back

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago

CONSERVATIVES ARE A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 197 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Toxic Food Package Makers: "It's not new"

EPA: "We only found out about it four years ago"

TFPM: "Yeah but it's not new so you can't regulate it."

Judge: "Sounds old to me, you're allowed to continue poisoning everyone."

What a joke of a system of government. Total fucking clown show.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right? You successfully hid a crime for years, now we must let you continue.

What the ever loving fuck?

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, the clown chakra is certainly open, spewing it's poison everywhere. The yellowjack transmissions coming through, showing us who we really are, what god we really serve. Probably a bunch of fine Christians are complicit and/or approve. The old gods need to die already.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

My dude Khorne will have heard you call for its death and I will not stand up for you in that fight.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah but also can we just write a law for it, too?

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

I'd love too but it's old...hands are tied

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The law authorizing the FDA to regulate food covers this. Congress gave the FDA the power to make these regulations.

Don't let anyone tell you we need a law for everything. There's a reason why we don't need new laws for everything toxic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I hope everyone of the judges on the 5th circuit eat from said containers. Fuck those sociopathic assholes.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 73 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you ever read "fifth circuit court of appeals", know that you're about to read some bullshit. Every bad decision the current Supreme Court has made started with the fifth circuit.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

The judge shopping to get this crooked court should be stopped. How long until it takes affect?

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

They are pretty consistently shitheads.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 69 points 2 years ago

Fucking hell we should be banning all disposable plastic, not just the obviously super toxic stuff fml

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 69 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Why do they hate humanity so much? That's a rhetorical question, but I also don't truly know the answer

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

It's not exactly that they hate humanity, it's that they hate any part of humanity they can't get money from.

If you're the part of humanity that has lots of money to spend, they love you. Especially if you give lots of money to them.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Poor people use this more than rich people. Sick poor people having to take care of themselves and babies with birth defects mean they will be desperate to take any job, and take all kinds of abuse just so they can get some healthcare from that job (which won’t be enough to help them more than a tiny bit, of course).

They want an uneducated and desperate underclass. Otherwise how will they get their slave labor to increase their personal profits?

[–] dragontangram88@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Wouldn’t paper based boxes be better for the environment, and our health, anyway? Why are we still using plastic boxes for food?

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago

It’s an oil byproduct, cheap waste made into something that can be given to the public and called useful even when we know it’s killing us.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plastic is cheap and durable. The environmental and health concerns are rarely a factor for companies making the choice.

[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We could make them responsible for those things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How do they make paper impenetrable to greasy wet food? PFAS coatings...

[–] dragontangram88@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Some food boxes are the really thick, compostable, paper boxes, that hold up pretty well to greasy foods. Another option is to place wax paper under the greasy food, between the food and the bottom of the box. Both options are better for the planet than the ones with pfas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Waxed paper, like they did before plastic.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Big oil has entered the chat

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Making paper is a pretty nasty process and wasteful as well. Cardboard also runs the risk of being heavier to transport than plastics, when it comes to single use anyway -- and that means more energy and emissions to transport them.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

It is biodegradable and comes from a natural resource that can be sustainable though. Plastic is just... There. Grocery stores have switched back to paper bags awhile ago instead of plastic, so it's able to be done.

It's a crap situation.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FilterItOut@thelemmy.club 52 points 2 years ago

Why does it not surprise me that a company that is totally in love with the idea of poisoning people is based in texas?

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

5th circuit is where all the problems come from

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By the courts logic on this asbestos should be absolutely fine to put in everything since the harmful effects of it weren't found until decades after.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The harmful effects were known in antiquity. It's just that everyone found it so useful (and it was mined by slaves which were less vocal). So nothing new there.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I immediately knew this would be the fifth circuit.

[–] babypigeon@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Didn't we use asbestos for decades too? JFC GOP.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago

It has been less than four years since we had a president that thinks asbestos is 100% safe and the push to remove it was a conspiracy by the mafia to get the construction contracts. We've conclusively known that it is toxic for over 100 years and there is some evidence that we have known for a couple thousand years.

[–] dnu@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 years ago

They want to bring asbestos back too. So...yknow

[–] poppy@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don’t want to be the bearer of bad news, but the US has still been using asbestos. Just this month they finally banned chrysotile asbestos which is still in use.

[–] babypigeon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I had no.idea. Wtf is wrong with us?

[–] Pogogunner@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago

Houston-based Inhance manufactures wants to continue to poison its customers, and future generations so that they don't have to try anything different.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Yay cancer in my chicken tenders

[–] frefi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guess I won't be buying anymore frozen dinners for a while... It's probably for the best lol

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It is, but even so you'd probably be fine. Just don't heat it in the plastic container.

Or get ones that aren't plastic. I like the pot pies, and they have paper dishes as a bonus.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This seems safe. What could possibly go wrong?

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Awesome now my lead and mercury infused crystal drinkware company can come back into existence! It is also old technology, only found out about relatively recently comapred to the thousand years prior it was being used harmlessly enough.

Next stop, opening up a uranium glass cobranded company!

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Each time, I read a piece of news about the US. I think, “dig deeper”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Doesn't this take a few threats to shut them up? How the fuck is this a thing.

load more comments
view more: next ›