489
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Conservative fifth circuit overturns EPA’s ban prohibiting Inhance from using manufacturing process creating toxic compound

A federal appeals court in the US has killed a ban on plastic containers contaminated with highly toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” found to leach at alarming levels into food, cosmetics, household cleaners, pesticides and other products across the economy.

Houston-based Inhance manufactures an estimated 200m containers annually with a process that creates, among other chemicals, PFOA, a toxic PFAS compound. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in December prohibited Inhance from using the manufacturing process.

But the conservative fifth circuit court of appeals court overturned the ban. The judges did not deny the containers’ health risks, but said the EPA could not regulate the buckets under the statute it used.

The rule requires companies to alert the EPA if a new industrial process creates hazardous chemicals. Inhance has produced the containers for decades and argued that its process is not new, so it is not subject to the regulations. The EPA argued that it only became aware that Inhance’s process created PFOA in 2020, so it could be regulated as a new use, but the court disagreed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dragontangram88@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago

Wouldn’t paper based boxes be better for the environment, and our health, anyway? Why are we still using plastic boxes for food?

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

It’s an oil byproduct, cheap waste made into something that can be given to the public and called useful even when we know it’s killing us.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago

Plastic is cheap and durable. The environmental and health concerns are rarely a factor for companies making the choice.

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

We could make them responsible for those things.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Plastic lobby says no.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

How do they make paper impenetrable to greasy wet food? PFAS coatings...

[-] dragontangram88@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Some food boxes are the really thick, compostable, paper boxes, that hold up pretty well to greasy foods. Another option is to place wax paper under the greasy food, between the food and the bottom of the box. Both options are better for the planet than the ones with pfas.

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Waxed paper, like they did before plastic.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Big oil has entered the chat

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Making paper is a pretty nasty process and wasteful as well. Cardboard also runs the risk of being heavier to transport than plastics, when it comes to single use anyway -- and that means more energy and emissions to transport them.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It is biodegradable and comes from a natural resource that can be sustainable though. Plastic is just... There. Grocery stores have switched back to paper bags awhile ago instead of plastic, so it's able to be done.

It's a crap situation.

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Grocery stores have switched back to paper bags awhile ago instead of plastic, so it’s able to be done.

Where? God, I wish. I ask for one and the cashier's roll their eyes.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Everyone I know in the US has been using reusable bags for like ten years now.

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago
[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

And what? You said people roll their eyes. That hasn't been a problem in ten years.

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

And reusable bags are irrelevant in a conversation about stores switching back to paper bags. Where is this happening? You don't know either.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are you intentionally being obtuse?

[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Do you not know how to read?

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
489 points (99.8% liked)

News

23301 readers
1187 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS