1020
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

“There's this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 346 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hey, somebody's gotta pay for the highest corporate profits in 70 years.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 116 points 2 months ago

Important to note:

Companies aren't just raising prices enough to cover costs, they're padding their margins on top.

Just saying that their profit is higher means nothing because of inflation. Inflation will mean that their profits are more often than not the highest they have ever been every year. But the highest margins? That shows they are price gouging.

[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 98 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you want to know how bad we're being fucked, search for the PPI, the producer price index. CPI, the one we always hear about, is the measure of inflation to us, the consumer. The PPI is the measure of inflation to producers, what they pay for goods and services to produce the goods and services we buy.

The PPI has been back to "normal" for a while now. Pretty much as soon as the post COVID logistics issues were mostly ironed out. The difference between PPI and CPI changes is almost all profit.

We don't get daily articles on the PPI though, I wonder why.

Tell people about PPI whenever you can, online or off, the more people know, the better. It's easy enough to say inflation is just down to greed but being able to back it up by comparing two simple charts will help people really understand.

PPI

CPI

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago

Exactly that. On average the economy is doing fine but it's skewed very heavily towards the top and nothing much for the 90%. The median income is actually decreasing.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 192 points 2 months ago

There's a term for this, HENRY. High Earner, Not Rich Yet. The lie is the "Yet". Millennials and Gen Xers have been struggling to reach the middle class that is kept perpetually out of reach. They have given up on the idea of financial solvency and are going into debt to indulge in luxuries like having children, going on vacations, and living somewhere that isn't a complete shithole. Saving for retirement is as realistic as training to live on Mars, so why bother? Keep digging a financial hole and then lie down and die in it.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 112 points 2 months ago

Gen X here and I can’t afford to contribute to my retirement. Even had to withdraw some during unemployment. I’m either working until I die or hoping assisted suicide becomes legal in 20 years.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago

Yep. Same. I do pretty good for myself and I'm more fortunate than most, but I had to borrow money from my dad recently for a series of expenses I couldn't absorb in real time. I got the "you don't know how to budget" sermon. It felt as fun as you'd expect

I said fuck it and gave him a list of earnings and expenses (I'm pretty frugal) and he was like, "oh..."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 52 points 2 months ago

Gen Millennial here. I can assist you on your suicide that day for a hot meal so I can at least eat on that day. Maybe someone from Gen Z can assist my suicide if I leave him my blanket then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

assisted suicide

Is that when you die but take a billionaire with you?

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 months ago

On the bright side, 9mm is cheaper than a retirement home. Somebody's getting a blowjob on my 60th birthday, and it ain't gonna be me!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Magister@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

X here too, 53yo, cannot contribute to retirement. At 67 I will have to sell my house because I'll not be able to afford taxes, insurances, power, repair, etc

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

I might be "rich" when my parents die, depending on how much elder care they need.

I'm actually kind of looking forward to the day I look my kids in the eye and say "I'm going out to look for firewood" and just walk out into the snow and die.

But there won't be any snow anymore so I'll just wander off into a slightly chilly night.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

slightly chilly night.

You're a glass half full kind of person, aren't you?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (86 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 148 points 2 months ago

Honestly, same boat. Our power bill has gone up over 20% this past year like it's insane. Our grocery costs have easily doubled in that time, too. Like I'm doing the math and seeing the numbers like I'm making more than I was 3 years ago, but I wasn't living paycheck to paycheck then, and I'm rationing food today.

I also can't count the number of times prices have gone up on common groceries in the last year. Every time I go in I'm spending more than I did the previous time. And the grocery stores around here have started phasing out their cost saving brands. More and more lately what used to be the expensive brand is the only one left, and I'm paying twice as much for half as much compared to what I was getting before. They're not even trying to hide what they're doing.

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

I'm in this same boat. I get letters from the power company all the time about how I'm using more power than anyone around me. The heat in my place has been kept around 62 all winter, occasionally allowed to get colder. It's a pretty modern build for a house too. I actually used my PC to heat just my bedroom over winter which should be far more power efficient the heating every room. The letters I get try selling me how I need to or could be more efficient like genius ideas like "turn down the thermostat"... its already nearly almost off, just enough to make sure pipes don't freeze.

Only thing that really changed was they installed a new smart meter last fall, of which I had no say.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago

In Canada those so-called smart meters turned out to be sending incorrect data (or no data at all) AND causing fires.

Best of luck in getting the powers that be to check them tho. :/

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I went grocery shopping Saturday. Grapes were $6/pound. It's getting so we can't afford produce anymore.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 128 points 2 months ago

I had dinner with my mom last night. She told me she made $2.20/hr as a waitress in 1972. Not including tips.

That's the equivalent of over $16/hr now.

The boomers have no idea how lucky they were. And they fucking wasted it.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 92 points 2 months ago

They weren't lucky. They voted for people that removed all the guardrails that enabled their success.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

I agree. I still think they were lucky insofar as they were born in the right place at the right time to benefit massively over future generations.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 2 months ago

This is the important detail. Europe was destroyed and the USA was able to flourish. Opportunities existed that will likely never exist again. Capitalism has never been as great as it was in the USA post-WWII.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

They had too. They couldn't get rich if they had to pay workers what they were paid when they were starting out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

Waiters today make $2.13 an hour in my state.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 98 points 2 months ago

Nikki Cimino, a 40-year-old recruiter living in Denver, said she finally saved up enough to buy a condo last year, but missed out on the ultra-low interest rates that had made homeownership more affordable in the early days of the pandemic. Her 5.25% interest rate pushed her monthly payments to $1,650. After a divorce in 2020, she’s shouldering $4,000 in credit card debt.

It's the credit card debt...

Instead of paying that off since 2020, she saved a down payment and bought an expensive condo. She's wasting a shit ton of money on interest because credit cards are all like 20-30%

Credit cards are predatory, if you ever carry a balance to the next month, that needs to be your highest priority.

Do a transfer to get 0% each year if you have to when recovering from emergencies. But paying credit interest for years is insane.

[-] nulluser@programming.dev 64 points 2 months ago

Holy crap! She was "saving up" to buy a condo instead of using that money to pay off the credit cards? That's absolutely insane. I really feel like society would benefit immensely if there were mandatory financial literacy courses every 4 years, or at least before any major purchases (house, car, etc).

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

Or just common sense laws against predatory lending by capping interest rates.

Most people don't have a safety net and live paycheck to paycheck.

A huge expense comes up, and rather than get a bank loan at even 8-10%, it goes on a credit card

Companies have a tiny "minimum payment" because they don't want you to pay it off. They want that balance to grow while people ignore it. They don't want it back now, they want thousands more later.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] noxy@yiffit.net 71 points 2 months ago

I like the implication that economists aren't people

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] protist@mander.xyz 66 points 2 months ago

Her mortgage is $1650/mo, which is incredibly reasonable in Denver. I think this specific person's problems have more to do with her recent divorce. She was used to splitting costs, and probably spent quite a bit on the divorce itself

[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

She's paying $1650 for a house? You'd pay more for a house in a neighborhood where every night is the purge here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

The floor is rising! But, the floor is lava.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 49 points 2 months ago

To anyone struggling in the USA and wondering how to possibly get out, just live like Congress and become rich. Then, money problems are way easier to handle. If you have as much money as a Congressman, you will be equally as unconcerned with them as to the state of our union and you will be able to say things are great with a straight face.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not even.

All you really need is wealthy parents. That way you never have to have any debt and get exploited by the credit system and can live your life glib and clueless and wondering why other people are so lazy and poor and didn't work hard like you.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

Like Dubya said, you should get 2 or 3 more jobs so you can put more food on your family.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

I'm in this article and don't like it.

[-] meowgenau@programming.dev 33 points 2 months ago

Gary Stevenson explains why this is, and why it's not gonna get better anytime soon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Consider the possibility that, first and given the political importance they have in the present day, the official numbers that the Economists are using are less than honest.

Also, I know that some countries don't include Housing Inflation - which is huge* - in their Official Inflation. Is that also the case in the US?

Last but not least, there is the whole difference between what is usually reported to us by Politicians, Economists and the Press, which is either country totals (which grow up merelly by the population growing) or the mean average (i.e. adding all values and dividing by the total number of points) which suffers from the "if a man has 10 chickens and 9 others have none, each has in average 1 chicken even though most have none" problem, and the mode (the value around which most cases are found) which is far more representative of most people's experiences: if for example the wealth increases from higher productivity are going entirelly to a few people who just get ever more filthy rich whilst the many have either stagnated or, worse, are getting a bit poorer due to inflation eating up the true value of their pay, the grand total will be growing, as will the average (if the population numbers are steady) but the mode will have stagnated or even be falling, matching the experience of most people - people get to hear about country GDP growing and even GPD-per-capita growing all the while the vast majority see not growth at all, maybe even a falling of their purchasing power (the latter for sure for any who don't already own their house).

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

A higher quality of living is being gatekept by the wealthy.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
1020 points (96.6% liked)

News

21302 readers
3190 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS