750
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 134 points 4 months ago

In two ways. They also killed the chances of further good deals. When they aren’t in power why would democrats ever want to negotiate with them

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 86 points 4 months ago

Because democrats are willing to do their jobs.

load more comments (43 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 53 points 4 months ago

The last time they had a majority (first mandate of Obama if I recall?) they tried to work with the Republicans in good faith and they got nowhere so fast that the public voted them out from dissatisfaction.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's how I remember it.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

It was a one person majority in the Senate that only lasted for a brief amount of time and was gone once healthcare reform ate up all of the time before Ted Kennedy died. They basically took what Mitt Romney had done at the state level and applied it federally, which is what Republicans claimed to want before they decided to call it Obamacare and pretend they didn't help craft it.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 4 months ago

The health care bill contained a series of things that are broadly popular when they were laid out individually. Package them together and call it "Obamacare" in the media and it was suddenly unpopular.

Tea Party astroturfing can't be understated, either. The GOP grabbed back power at just the right time to be able to gerrymander districts and then keep them gerrymandered up until now. We're only beginning to erode that back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Because you need 60 votes to do anything in the Senate.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 25 points 4 months ago

Only until the instant the Senate takes a simple majority vote to lower it to 50.

While the Senate has historically been a useful bulwark for pushing back against the creeping fascism of the GOP, it's also a matter of fact that it is an antidemocratic institution that in the longer term we're better off minimizing or eliminating. It's the House of Lords and we do not need a House of Lords in the modern era.

Though I would like to see proper reapportionment in the House of Reps first, including adding significantly more members.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 12 points 4 months ago

While the Senate has historically been a useful bulwark for pushing back against the creeping fascism of the GOP

Has it?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Because corporate dems are basically republicans. Our whole political system is right of center. With a few outliers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Have you ever listened to Democrats? The leadership keeps saying that they believe we need a strong Republican Party for some reason.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 112 points 4 months ago

The year is 2006 and Republicans are killing a compromise deal that they all admitted they actually liked.

The year is 2014 and Republicans are killing a compromise deal that they all admitted they actually liked.

The year is 2024 and the GOP is about to win in a landslide on the "Democrats never get anything done" platform, so I guess you can't argue with their results.

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago

Idk if I believe that.

We're about to see a lot of "unlikely voters" turning out....

And to think, running the same guy who tried to cling to power with a self coup after losing the last election in a landslide to the guy you lost to 4 years ago who's supreme court justices "Roe is settled law" brought about headlines of suffering and skyrocketing teen pregnancy.....

Anyway remember that foreign policy is about power, not morality. And if "both sides are the same" no, one side is corporate shills and the other are fascist sycophants.

Not voting for Biden or Not Voting is a vote for the Christian Caliphate where white is right but only if you're a straight male. Everyone else can stay in the kitchen or go to the camps. History doesn't repeat but it rhymes

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] flicker@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

My uterus is downright furious. I'm so glad it can't read or it might try arson.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Amen.

Never forget that Democrats were supposed to lose the midterms in a landslide and the economy was the top priority, supposedly. They barely lost the House but made gains in the Senate. And I think if you ask Republicans if they feel like winners in the House... Well, we can all see how that's been going.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

We're about to see a lot of "unlikely voters" turning out....

I'll fucking believe that when I see it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

I dont think that will fly this time. It's VERY obvious now that they can't do ANYTHING in the house. Their ability to govern has been laid bare.

Meanwhile Biden managed to pass some of the most meaningful and useful legislation in decades with the previous congress. So even if Republicans do nothing, Biden's done more than the last two presidents to move the needle.

Also, they got clowned hard. Biden admitted he'd shut down the border--which is what they were clamoring for him to do. Then they killed it. They dont care about the border and its obvious. This isn't going to be laid at Dems feet.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

It’s VERY obvious now that they can’t do ANYTHING in the house.

But it is equally obvious that guys like Abbot and DeSantis have an open hand to act as they please on the border. That's where this gets dangerous.

By bogging down the legislative process and allowing Biden to twiddle his thumbs in the White House, we have transferred enormous amounts of power to the border states with the most horrific people in charge. The GOP decision to kill the bill was calculated, as it accrued authority to their allies in the Southwest.

Also, they got clowned hard.

They got laughed at by the same group of jokers who were going to point and laugh at them regardless. Meanwhile, right-wing talk radio is spinning this as a victory for the Immigration Absolutists and a rallying cry for the Trump Presidential campaign.

Democrats have shown their hand on what they will concede. Republicans are in a strong position to advance their majorities in House and Senate into the next cycle. That puts the ball in their court, even if Mike Johnson personally looks like a weak Speaker. Republicans don't care if he's weak, because they've put all their chips on Trump anyway.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The year is 2024 and the GOP is about to win in a landslide on the "Democrats never get anything done" platform, so I guess you can't argue with their results.

~~2018 is going to be a red wave~~

~~2020 is going to be a red wave~~

~~2022 is going to be a red wave~~

Surely 2024 will be a red wave!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 86 points 4 months ago

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to throw this in every Trump voter's face any time they mention the border or national security ever again. They'll be back to know-nothing cockroach status again in 2025.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 32 points 4 months ago

Yeah, that'll work about as well as reminding them about the Reagan tax cuts, Bush's wars, and Trump's fuckery ballooned the national debt that they're always so "worried" about.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

I've used similar pressure about Trump's steel tariffs to shut chuds up about politics. It works.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 79 points 4 months ago

Imagine overlooking the benefit to your citizens because you want your would be leader to do it instead.

And people still vote for these pieces of shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 71 points 4 months ago

If you’re ever arguing with a relative, remember that this is the most unproductive House of Representatives that we’ve ever had. Ever. They’re barely even working in there. Why? Because republicans are sitting on their hands for everything

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago

If talking to a relative remind them that the border patrol themselves supported this bill despite normally criticizing Biden.

That's what will fluster them the most.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 65 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Voters are dumb as fuck or lazy. It should be a complete wipe out so many times over but the fact that it's even remotely close is crazy.

You'll have some person come in and say the usual: "the Dems can't work or get stuff done".

This type of thing should ensure none of them should work in public office again but the voters ain't gonna do shit.

[-] winky9827b@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

I'm a voter. I will 'do shit'. It's a fucked up world and many people fit your generalization, but it's the job of reasonable people everywhere to educate others and promote sanity and optimism wherever possible.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago

Yeah, you're right. I think Jon Stewart said that he hates apathy and all that when he first departed the Daily Show.

I just think my wall-to-wall coverage of all of this has angered me too much.

Thanks for being a reasonable voice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 58 points 4 months ago

The point was never to secure the border, the point was to make it look like Democrats weren't.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 36 points 4 months ago

it was a gift, and they tossed it because the democrats might look good for compromising and working across-the-aisle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

Its ALWAYS one vote short. The 60th voter- ONE FUCKING PERSON-fucked the entire voting popukation.

It is absolutely controlled opposition, every time.

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

Pussies for Trump should be their catchphrase.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 28 points 4 months ago

They lack the warmth and depth to be pussies.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The only thing that matters to authoritarians is that they win. They do not care if they are king of the shitpile, or if the world burns down around them. As long as other people are kissing their ass while it happens.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago

Just wanted to point out if you've got a spare half hour, it's worth listening to the audio in the article where they interview Michael Bennett. He hits on a lot of nuances about the immigration issue that isn't often covered in most articles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Yeah, yeah, yeah. We all know that Republicans are nothing more than fucking cowards that won't ever do what's right and will always bitch and fucking moan about how they know they're shit people when they're alone.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

The rest of us are admitting it in public, so maybe they should too.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago

This should be in the dictionary under the phrase "Cutting off your nose to spite your face."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
750 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2638 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS