81
submitted 10 months ago by flyingsheep@lemmyhub.com to c/news@lemmy.world

Harvard University has been sued by Jewish students alleging it "has become a bastion of rampant anti-Jewish hatred and harassment".

The complaint alleges the Ivy League school is violating the civil rights of its Jewish students by tolerating and enabling discrimination on its campus.

It comes just over a week after its president, Claudine Gay, resigned in part over her handling of antisemitism.

Harvard has not yet commented on the lawsuit.

The complaint, filed on Wednesday night, argues that Jewish students have been "subjected to a severe and pervasive antisemitic hostile educational environment" that have worsened since Hamas's 7 October attack on Israel.

It claims that Harvard students and faculty members have harassed, intimidated and assaulted Jewish students in classrooms, in on-campus activities and on social media, including by calling for the murder of Jews and the destruction of Israel.

"What is most striking about all of this is Harvard's abject failure and refusal to lift a finger to stop and deter this outrageous antisemitic conduct and penalize the students and faculty who perpetrate it," the complaint states.

The claimants - a student at Harvard Divinity School and a group called Students Against Antisemitism, which include students at Harvard's law and public health schools - allege that antisemitism on campus "manifests itself in a double standard".

Harvard, they say, "selectively enforces its policies to avoid protecting Jewish students from harassment, hires professors who support anti-Jewish violence and spread antisemitic propaganda, and ignores Jewish students' pleas for protection", while disciplining those who engage in racism, transphobia and other forms of discrimination.

The complaint seeks monetary damages and an injunction to stop Harvard's alleged violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars those who receive federal funds from allowing discrimination based on race.

The court filing was made by the Kasowitz Benson Torres law firm, which has launched similar lawsuits at New York University and the University of Pennsylvania.

Harvard has been under fire in the months since the Hamas attack, with the US education department and the House of Representatives both opening investigations into its handling of antisemitism on campus.

Last week, Claudine Gay - the university's first black president - resigned following criticisms of her response to anti-semitism on campus, and allegations that she plagiarised parts of her academic work. She faced a firestorm of criticism over her December testimony before Congress, in which she failed to explicitly say that calls for the genocide of Jews violated university policy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 106 points 10 months ago

I'll reserve judgement until more information comes out, but this really strikes me as a group of lawyers and agitators latching on to the zeitgeist.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 80 points 10 months ago

It's really quite sad that the Israel simps have abused the idea of antisemitism to the point that when I see accusations of antisemitism, I genuinely have no idea if they're taking about serious bigotry or if they're talking about people saying it's bad to murder civilians.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

The picture that the BBC included in the article seems like it may be the latter.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

No need to speculate; the allegations are linked in the article:

Harvard students and faculty harass, discriminate, and assault Jewish students—including on October 18, when a mob of protesters attacked a Jewish student, and the next day, when a mob trapped a group of Jewish students in a study room

Subjected to intense anti-Jewish vitriol, including from their own professors and Harvard administrators, Kestenbaum and other Jewish students, including SAA members, have been deprived of the ability and opportunity to fully participate in Harvard’s educational and other programs and have been placed at severe emotional and physical risk.

Moreover, over the past ten years, Harvard has instituted admissions policies that have severely reduced—by as much as sixty percent—the number of Jewish students, an enormous decline that evinces an intentional effort, much like Harvard’s quotas one hundred years ago, to exclude Jews.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

when a mob of protesters attacked a Jewish student, and the next day, when a mob trapped a group of Jewish students in a study room

The important part here seems to be left out: did Harvard punish the students responsible for this? I find it hard to believe that they got away with this if they actually did it and we know who they are.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

He showed up at a pro Palestinian protest to try and dox the students there. They asked him to leave. He ignored them and was then escorted out. People did not say nice things to him.

I'm not sure there was a lot to punish.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

That's still speculative; for it's merely one side making allegations without demonstrating substantive evidence in front of a court.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 1 points 9 months ago

I start d (slowly) reading this and... Is this how legal briefs are written? It seems like a reddit blog post. For instance in the examples section they write "SJp ... is one of the most vitriolic antisemitic networks on college campuses. SJP was founded by the chairman of American Muslims for Palestine (“AMP”), the leadership of which overlaps with the leadership of organizations that have been shut down by federal authorities, whose assets were frozen by the U.S. Treasury Department, or that were found liable in civil actions for providing material support to Hamas. SJP receives funding and training from AMP as well as from universities. SJP and its affiliates sponsor antisemitic events, host antisemitic speakers..." All of which I'm reading expecting a citation somewhere... Anywhere. It seems like easily verifiable stuff. But there is none. Is this how legal briefs are written?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Being anti Israel is just not the same as being antisemitic. I'm not sure why that is such a hard thing for people to understand. Israel and Judaism are different things.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

It's because it makes it so much harder to be critical of Isreal if they can continue having anything labeled as antisemitic.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Yeah, OPs summary says they're doing it to multiple schools.

If their claims are true, then yeah, Harvard (and the other schools) should be held accountable.

But we'll probably never know if a settlement happens.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

That's my assumption--it's basically legal extortion.

I will say that I believe that there is antisemitism in most places because there are humans in most places. Whatever happens at Harvard is probably not exceptional or notable in any way.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Universities encourage critical thinking. For a lot of young adults, it's the first time being exposed to a lot of new ideas in their infancy. I wouldn't be surprised if it was higher simply because they are processing new concepts and sometimes come to unfortunate conclusions.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And it doesn't help that, as of late, the term "antisemite" is aggressively being expanded to include those who show any criticism whatsoever of the current Bibi administration.

It's crazy to me. On October 6th, 2023, the Bibi administration was largely viewed as a far right, antidemocratic, religiously extreme collection of intensely corrupt lunatics. On October 7th, so many otherwise totally-reasonable people just forgot how they felt the day before.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

That's how people respond to terrorist attacks. Look at what America did after 9/11, rallying behind Giuliani and Bush to attack Iraq because... Then you had bigots attacking Sikhs on the streets, Freedom Fries because France opposed indiscriminate bombing, and just about the most ridiculous performative security measures for people wanting to travel in a plane.

History will remember. We will look back on this time as a dark period of bigotry, violence, oppression, and genocide.

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Your last paragraph can describe almost any time period in human history.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It's true. And we didn't fix anything, we just made travel so much more miserable and put in laws to let the government spy on people. As we saw with both 9/11 and Oct 6, high surveillance isn't the answer. We need to move beyond security theater and retribution.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I forgot about the spying! That's another good example, further emphasized by the fact that I forgot about it entirely.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It took 20 years for the GOP to realize that the PATRIOT Act was used mostly against them and not brown people lol.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 1 points 10 months ago

Freedom Fries because France opposed indiscriminate bombing

Speaking of which, he was apparently a slow learner.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

to include those who show any criticism whatsoever of the current Bibi administration.

I'm not sure why you're specifically mentioning one man's administration.

The main conflation of anti-Semitism has been with anti-Zionism, which dates back far before Bibi came into power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Critical thinking doesn't make people racist, though. I work at a university and have seen many people be edgy. Some do it for effect because they are, frankly, very immature and like that attention. Most who are actually racist were brought up that way or went down the rabbit hole sometime in high school.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Not to mention that Harvard will likely settle just to avoid going through discovery simply because they know there is an entire political movement looking for ANY excuse to go for blood with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jaderick@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

What constitutes “the destruction of Israel”?

Nuking Israel because it’s primarily Jewish? Yes fuck that, that’s anti-semitism.

Israel as a purely Jewish ethnostate? Fuck that too, non-Jews live there and everyone is human. Netanyahu’s comments on “Israel solely for Jews” is fucking stupid and he clearly learned nothing from the 20th century German attempt at an ethnostate.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

It's unfortunate that entities such as the ADL have intentionally (and openly) blurred the line between antisemitism and criticism of Israel, and the news just regurgitates whatever they tell them.

Is antisemitism up? Yes.

Is it particularly bad at universities? Probably.

Is it up by 5000000%? (I don't know the actual number, but the ADL likes to throw a big % out there.) No.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

26% of Israelis are not Jewish, and all citizens are legally entitled to the same rights.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

all citizens are legally entitled to the same rights

It's worth pointing out that, in general and throughout history, citizenship is something that separates the privileged from the unprivileged. The in-group from the outsider. The masters and the slaves.

Touting the rights of citizens, therefore, does not necessarily rebut the parent comment's criticism.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Not sure what you mean. Are there countries that guarantee equal rights to non-citizens?

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

No. And that's quite my point.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No they're not. Jewish Israelis have Jewish ancestry, which entitles them to more rights, and Palestinians are explicitly signaled as exceptions to a number of laws (see: Palestinian spouses of Israeli citizens can't be naturalized).

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

"It comes just over a week after its president, Claudine Gay, resigned in part over her handling of antisemitism."

Is this just blatant misinformation or am I out of the loop? I was under the impression that she resigned over plagiarism while some people online criticized her for "antisemitism". I haven't read anything about antisemitism being a primary cause from any publication but this one.

[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

As with anything you read about Israel, the facts are always distorted just slightly enough to completely change the message without flat out lying. It's not just you, there's a major funk around any Israel based news stories coming out of the mainstream media.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

“selectively enforces its policies to avoid protecting Jewish students from harassment, hires professors who support anti-Jewish violence and spread antisemitic propaganda, and ignores Jewish students’ pleas for protection”

The problem with this statement is it is completely subjective and not at all objective. The first one is reasonable if Jewish students are being verbally harassed walking through campus with complaints being ignored. That might very well be happening. However, the other ones sound a whole lot like, "you hired professors who don't 100% support Israel no matter what the country does." One person's "spread antisemitic propaganda" is another person's "shared a story from a reputable news source that didn't show 100% support for Israel."

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

If you cry ~~antisemitism~~ wolf enough times, sooner or later people will stop believing you.

[-] m13@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

This is absolutely gross and dangerous behaviour if this is what it sounds like: calling protests against genocide and Zionism as somehow “antisemitic”.

There are real antisemites to be fought against: actual Nazis, MAGA assholes, Casa Pound, Proud Boys, etc.

Anti-Zionists are not antisemites.

The same anti-fascists who are fighting against all these true antisemites are also the same people who are fighting against the genocidal ideology of Zionism.

Zionism is just another fascist ideology. It depends on apartheid, settler colonialism, and ethnic cleansing in order to build an ethnostate.

It’s absolutely disgusting of Zionists to pull out the “antisemitism” card when Israel and Zionism are being called out. They’re intentionally trying to muddy the water and it puts innocent people in danger.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

But they have always done it and it seems to work.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Without having seen the specific kind of “hatred and harassment” they’re talking about, I can’t form a valid opinion. I wonder, though, if people are interpreting fair criticism of the Israeli government as “antisemitism”. Fair criticism and antisemitism are two very different things, but I often see them confused.

Similarly, I wonder if people are trying to disguise hateful antisemitism as “fair criticism” when there’s nothing fair or reasonable about it.

As always, it will be difficult to protect freedom of speech while preventing and punishing hate speech.

[-] machinin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

This reminds me of this older video:

https://youtu.be/FtpgGxeCGpM

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
81 points (87.2% liked)

News

23263 readers
3793 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS