this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
89 points (98.9% liked)

movies

3893 readers
426 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 15 points 17 hours ago

I heard this marketing is all studio push because they didn't think people would want to watch a movie about peasants rising up against the wealthy.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Did people who did see it like it?

[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yea none of this means its actually bad movie. Might be worth looking into, who cares if it was poorly marketed as a robin hood film.

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

All I heard about it was Andrew Garfield promoting it, saying it's important for people to see and will hopefully inspire people who are feeling hopelessness in today's world.

If it's truly a film about a population "rising up" against their oligarch oppressors, I'm not shocked it was poorly advertised. The quicker it flops at the box office, the quicker Hollywood can bury it. Don't want to give a struggling population dealing with similar circumstances any ideas...

[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Something with this much of a budget a theatrical release totally has Hollywood money behind it. Its not like a purposefully orchestrated tax write off flop either, those are bigger budgets (Madam Webb = tax write off plus tactic to keep Spidey IP)

Someone may want to bury the film with lack of advertising though. Or, yeah, its just a bad movie they dont want to throw money at propping it. I'll try to see it in the next few weeks to decide myself.

..."Hollywood" is just a bunch of investors who want their percentage back and dont give a fuck about what message the film has.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The Robin Hood myth is so ancient it’s tied to demigods. There were Robins hooding after William th Conquer changed cow to beef. It’s a British archetype given name, right down to the bowmanship.

tl;dr - Robin Hood is an anthropomorphic personification.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 57 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Robin Hood is an anthropomorphic personification

I agree.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

Ooo de-lolly

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago

Golly what a day.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Tragic story of bad marketing…

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Literally the first I heard of the movie

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago
[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Can’t load the site because they don’t respect privacy.

So… it’s not a Robin Hood story?

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I was hoping this film could be Piers Plowman

Btw, Robinhood is a decent book to read to your kids.

[–] Micans@reddthat.com 3 points 9 hours ago

I have seen the trailer for this twice, and I swear they changed the name of the movie from Plowman to The Uprising.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Is this the film that tried to paint Robin Hood as bad? If so then good.jpg

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I thought that was The Death of Robin Hood. It's about an aging Robin Hood who is tormented by his life of killing and robbing people and looking for forgiveness before he dies.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I thought that was a great movie, but it was marketed all wrong. I hope more people watch it. Jackman was fantastic.

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Robin Hood has always been seen as a common-class hero, so a film where he regrets all the deeds he's performed (and supposedly all the people he murdered along the way) is re-writing the hero as a villain looking for redemption for his evil deeds.

Meanwhile, a new version of A Christmas Carol is releasing this year, simply titled Ebenezer, which is once again promoting the humanization and redemption of the wealthiest man in town.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Ebenezer, which is once again promoting the humanization and redemption of the wealthiest man in town.

Eeeeeeewwwww no thanks.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

This is another movie I put on because I was bored but got sucked into it from the opening scene. I agree Jackman did a great job in the role.

It's not a movie I'd recommend to the average person, as I'd call this Robin not quite a villain, but also not quite an anti-hero, but there have been some friends I've recommended this to.

Honestly, Little John was the character I was most conflicted about, because a lot of the unnecessary violence in this tale was centered around his actions, so it's the most fleshed out bit we really got to see/hear directly. It makes perfect sense why he does what he does, but we also see the people he did it to did not deserve what happens. Robin at least admits most of his life was wrong, but a good number did deserve (according to him) what they got, keeping the story from erasing all his anti-hero bits.