Beacon

Absolutely false. Not even remotely true.

Are these available in the US?

To me it's obviously screaming colorized.

The colors are way too uniform. All the blue scarves are exactly the same blue, all the skin tones are exactly the same, all the individual buildings have a color that's exactly uniform from corner to corner, etc.

And things like the ice are completely missing any color at all (except for maybe an overall blueish tint they added to the dark areas) but in real life everything has color. Objects that you might think are just monochrome black-gray-white actually have a lot of different colors in them. So when a section of a picture looks like a black n white photo instead of a color photo it immediately pops out to me.

Plus, the colors of all the different objects disagree on the type of light hitting them. Like for the black ice to have a significant blueish tint means the lighting of that day wouldn't create a pinkish skin tone.

And there's no atmospheric effects in the distance of colors. Like the column closest to the camera is the same color as the most distant column, but in reality colors fade as they go further into the distance even at the scale in this photo.

This concludes my procrastination ted talk.

With hardware prices being sky high, using hardware more efficiently is really helpful

I don't see a distinction between what you said vs a job. Like "I was a sailor with the Navy."

Colorized, presumably.

Is there a reference I'm missing?

Gay guys and asexuals disagree

Aww, they like to spend a lot of time in barns. How do they know if was built with them in mind?

I had a lot of potential.

Bruno movie proves the opposite iirc

Thanks for the info but I purposely only ever use effect. The difference conveys no additional information, and it's already close to an archaic usage