this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
89 points (98.9% liked)

movies

3893 readers
594 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yea none of this means its actually bad movie. Might be worth looking into, who cares if it was poorly marketed as a robin hood film.

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 34 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

All I heard about it was Andrew Garfield promoting it, saying it's important for people to see and will hopefully inspire people who are feeling hopelessness in today's world.

If it's truly a film about a population "rising up" against their oligarch oppressors, I'm not shocked it was poorly advertised. The quicker it flops at the box office, the quicker Hollywood can bury it. Don't want to give a struggling population dealing with similar circumstances any ideas...

[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

Something with this much of a budget a theatrical release totally has Hollywood money behind it. Its not like a purposefully orchestrated tax write off flop either, those are bigger budgets (Madam Webb = tax write off plus tactic to keep Spidey IP)

Someone may want to bury the film with lack of advertising though. Or, yeah, its just a bad movie they dont want to throw money at propping it. I'll try to see it in the next few weeks to decide myself.

..."Hollywood" is just a bunch of investors who want their percentage back and dont give a fuck about what message the film has.