this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

904 readers
536 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do straight guys realize that straight women have always had a "buffet of cock" available to them if they so choose, long before any dating apps or feminism? Most women don't really want all of that male attention, but for those who do more power to them. In general, straight women get more male attention than they want, not less. They aren't rigging the world to make men even more horny for them.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Celt woman in Britain according to a Roman:

"We fulfil the demands of nature in a much better way than do you Roman women; for we consort openly with the best men, whereas you let yourselves be debauched in secret by the vilest." Such was the retort of the British woman.

Keep in mind that the "barbarian critic" is an ancient trope for the author themselves to critique society but hey this tracks.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Keep in mind that the "barbarian critic" is an ancient trope for the author themselves to critique society but hey this tracks.

What if we had a "Chinese critic" trope we could use to the same effect

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

To do it right it needs to be like the domestic person's petty griping so something like, "when Yao Ming visited he scoffed at the portions at the Denny's. 'In China we eat buffet all day anywhere. You call this enough food? No wonder your export market is so flimsy.'"

[–] scrungus@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Is Chen Weihua still around?

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

idk man its not the iron age anymore you can probably just find an actual chinese person saying this thing instead of making up some guy in your mind lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kristina@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

no, they are incapable of empathy and putting themselves in someone elses shoes, especially when horny.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You'd be surprised some men are absolutely radioactive but they love their pets since it's the only bond they can form with others. Case in point me when I was a bitter chud and my cat, and my dad and his cat.

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Misanthropy and extreme love for your pets does seem to have a high level of correlation. There's even a series of action films starring Keanu Reeves about this.

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Actionfilms ? I thought those were documentaries ?

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

I think it's just that the phrase ”cat dad” isn't very alpha male Dude Wipes Hooters.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

A lot of chuds seem to believe the phrase "toxic masculinity" is referring to the entire concept itself as toxic rather than certain manifestations of masculinity. Or maybe they disagree that it can ever be toxic. Whatever who cares

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

A lot of chuds seem to believe the phrase "toxic masculinity" is referring to the entire concept itself as toxic rather than certain manifestations of masculinity.

Certainly true of the more potato-brained of the hogs. I'm going to sound like an asshole for saying this but half of the working class are really really really not think-ey people, like seriously they barely think at all during their days. A lot of western marxism has this issue of coming from suburbia and well educated groups of people and they very naively (in a good way) think everyone thinks like them. This however is not the experience I have seen for myself in the bottom of society where people are guided far more by raw emotion and gliding through their days than by any real introspection, rationalisation or logical decision making. I love and sympathise with many of these people deeply but they are raw to put it nicely. There is a reason a vanguard is needed.

Concepts like toxic masculinity are too high, they're good arguments for the college educated and suburbanites but they do not reach many of the lower levels of the working class. This isn't helped by a kneejerk resistance to criticism that they have.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

They haven't actually read any feminist theory, so it is pointless to argue feminist points with them.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't think about it to hard. They haven't.

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

They only think about being hard

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They take these concept and assume they are stupid based on the name alone, while refusing to hear any explanations. R*pe culture, wage gap, patriarchy, many such cases. There is no point trying to explain it to them

[–] axont@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You've just made me realize so many things. That makes too much sense. These people are opposed to things based on the name alone and don't care to learn what things actually mean. One time I was arguing with a chud who was convinced the company FedEx is government owned because it had federal in the name.

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

One time I was arguing with a chud who was convinced the company FedEx is government owned because it had federal in the name.

i-cant

I remember there was this old dismissive phrase that feminists online liked to use and which made everyone angry - "it is not my job to educate you". I used to think this was a wrong approach, that you do actually need to actively educate people. But now I fully understand why they were saying it. There is no point in arguing with a literal C.H.U.D - a sub-sapient goblin-like creature who just crawled out of the sewer 10 seconds ago, and is now demanding you explain basic shit to it.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

They like the toxic kinds.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i have yet to see anything that supposedly differentiates gendered behavior that isn't toxic and/or bioessentialism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Noodles4dinner@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cat dad: Cat dad to greg, cat dad to greg, over Greg: 10-4 Cat dad. This is greg, what's your 20? Over

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Breaker breaker 1-9, how floofy is your woofer? Over.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Me gobbling up my cockffet yummy

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Is that where cockfetti comes from? Sorry if it's an ignorant question, I'll take my answer off the air.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hi you still doing that special, buffet of cock for $6? I'd like a reservation please.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

YOU gotta pay ME if you want me to eat at your diner.

No, I will not be leaving a good review. I don't think the chef even washed his utensils before cooking.

geordi-no Eagles of Death Metal

geordi-yes Jimmy Buffett of Cock

[–] PraiseCorn@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Unlimited free refills, FOR COCK

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

That's awful, where? thats-disgusting-where

Tbh I'm serving a cold continental breakfast at my best

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

aaron just be gay if you want sex i dont make the rules

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

prosecuting masculinity

Alpha male spotted, 20 years in the gulag for him gulag

[–] Kefla@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have to be very careful how long you keep them in the gulag. Too short a stay and they're still an alpha male, too long and they end up as a sigma male. You're aiming for that beta male sweet spot

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Very true, very dangerous. 1 sigma male could destabilize our entire regime dafoe-horror

[–] PraiseCorn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Nyet, he deserves how-compelling wall-flipped

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they upset they aren't in the buffet?

Or is all the misogyny and hatered towards women their form of a pick up line?

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Why don't women date me? They must not be interested in a fine dining experience

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The proper syntax is cat dad -> greg

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
class Child:
    def __init__(self, name: str) -> None:
        self.name = name


class Person:
    def __init__(self, name: str) -> None:
        self.name = name
        self.children = list[Child]()

    def adopt(self, child: Child) -> None:
        self.children.append(child)

    def __repr__(self) -> str:
        return f'{self.name} has {len(self.children)} kids'

greg = Child("Greg")
aaron = Person("Aaron")
aaron.adopt(greg)
[–] uokgerku@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
Welcome to SWI-Prolog (threaded, 64 bits, version 10.0.2)
SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software.
Please run ?- license. for legal details.

For online help and background, visit https://www.swi-prolog.org/
For built-in help, use ?- help(Topic). or ?- apropos(Word).

15 ?- [user].
|: child(greg).
|: cat(greg).
|: man(aaron).
|: dad(aaron, greg).
|: catdad(X, Y) :- dad(X, Y), cat(Y).
|: ^D% user://1 compiled 0.00 sec, 5 clauses
true.

15 ?- catdad(aaron, greg).
true.

18 ?- catdad(X, Y).
X = aaron,
Y = greg.
16 ?- [user].
|: woman(X) :- \+ man(X).
|: feminism.
|: buffetavailable(cock, X) :- feminism, woman(X).
|: ^D% user://2 compiled 0.00 sec, 3 clauses
true.

17 ?- buffetavailable(cock, aaron).
false.

pronouns

spoilerPls forgive the non-monotonic woman reasoning >w<

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I love prolog

Also trying to format Python on a phone keyboard is hell. Especially without a monospaced font lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Having a pet doesnt mean you are a good person. There are loads of people who are nice to their pets ....which doesnt mean much more beyond that.

EDIT This is not meant as an attack on Pet owners. Im sure there are tons of pet owners who are wonderful human beans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something tells me he's gonna be on that app for a while, and it's not just because dating apps are designed to do so

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Wait, you're telling me this profile ISN'T drawing in all the women?!?!?!?1/1/1/?!?!

[–] dadarobot@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

cat dad > greg

ok, now what?

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›