Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
I can't remove the video from showing.
I remember my father joked about "The US has shot a tenorist, thought he was a terrorist." in 2007. We're back in the terrorist paranoia age.
What kind of moron would find this offensive, I wonder?
I suspect that they might own a red hat...
And/or just really loves bombing kids.
This is ANTI SEMETIC because ONLY Jews Bomb Kids!
-United Airlines!
Well, the US also bombs kids, but mostly because Israel asked them to.
Did Israel ask the US to bomb kids in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Laos, etc? They can bomb kids on their own, they don't need the help of an apartheid state.
"What are you gonna do, United? Bomb me? I'm not a child! Ha!"
Dobbing themselves in. Who is he talking about, doesn't say a name. They have to first admit that's what they're doing, and secondly they don't want people talking about it, lest thier reputation be tarnished.
Eh, I kinda get it they probably just have a thing for the word bomb anywhere near an airport -- sounds like they let him fly though
Do they censor all the bookshop merchandise too?
"She kept saying, like, 'You could see how the shirt is offensive.' I was like, 'I can't see how the shirt is offensive,'" Saadeh said. "She was like, 'It's 2026.' I was like, 'I know what year it is.'"
He added, " 'Do you think kids shouldn't be bombed, or kids should be bombed? Like, what are you offended by?'"
Based.
Depends on the kids' race, obviously. /s
It’s 2026, basic logic and human decency is extremism.
I know what year it is
lol
She just doesn't want to know about the kids being bombed. Should and Shouldn't is irrelevant to her life. (How most American's act towards "others.")
This isn't how most Americans act towards others.
You either only visited a shit part of the US, or you've never been here.
Remember in that Wonder Woman 1984 when zionists got angry when it showed some well armed western equipped troops oppressing some poor people in a arid landscape and they claimed it was obviously about Israel and was thus antisemitic? Anything about arab children being attacked or bombed has to be hidden I guess or you're the evil one.
This seems exceptionally stupid when coupled with the article from just a few hours ago about Christian preachers spouting off on planes but the flight attendants "can't do anything about it".
Lol, I've watched a flight attendant force a kid to piss their pants because the seatbelt sign was on. Fuck all the off that they can't tell someone to sit down and shut the fuck up.
Even if it is offensive to you, having such a broad non-specific policy about denying service for "offensive" clothing is ridiculous.
Say I, a lefty, am a flight attendent. Can I deny entry to anyone wearing a MAGA hat, an anti-trans ("try to milk a bull") t-shirt, a vaguely threatening pro-gun ("come and take it") shirt, a fur jacket, etc? I genuinely find such things offensive. So I can kick those people out? No? Tell me what is different about that. What about someone wearing a shirt that says "Aborting kids is not healthcare"? I can't think of a more direct and likely parallel than that. Is that too offensive to board a plane? Explain to me why not. Explain it slowly and think about your words as you do.
His shirt didn't even specify an event, any parties to the event, or any sort of threat. It is not explicitly about any specific person or party. It is about children in general and those who would bomb them and call that warfare. It was just stating a moral stance, and a pretty low bar one at that, one that most people would agree on without aby other context projected on it. Her offense was almost certainly due to a projection of meaning that she put upon it, not even the shirt itself. A meaning that she assumed was true for no reason but her own and that she found offensive due to her personal politics around the events she connected it to. How can you enforce a policy broad enough to allow someone to project a specific interpretation on a non-specific phrase and consider that projected meaning offensive, thereby barring them from the plane.
If I wear a shirt that says "he did nothing wrong" with no further context, do you get to decide who "he" is and bar me from you plane because maybe I mean someone who you think did something wrong and you arw offended by the alternatove view? What if I mean a fictional character like Thanos? What if I mean someone whom you agree did nothing wrong? What if it is just a shirt I got from a thrift store and it has no known meaning to me at all? You see why that is stupid as fuck?
Israel is immune to criticism. It's a very clear and simple rule, I don't know why us lefty scum have such a problem with it.
/s
At work the other day, had someone very upset about someone in a fur suit that was a customer. Like they seemed to expect that I would kick them out because of the costume…
Back in the 90s... friends and I went to a restaurant with a salad bar that no longer exists, in full goth wear. Another customer there loudly complained to staff that we should be kicked out because of what we were wearing (no nudity. no graphics or words, just lots of black, eyeliner and big boots) the whole time. He arrived shortly after us and, while we could hear him repeatedly saying things, he never directly spoke to us. Weirdo.
Staff was very polite to us, and we to them, other dude was the only one freaking out.
A fur suit. Like ... OwO?
I'm sure you work somewhere where the public is allowed. Maybe a conventional center or something? But I was picturing cubicles, fluorescent lighting, rolling chairs, computers, and a man in a full panther costume who goes by Space Paws
That's just IT, they're chill. Don't know how they do half the tech wizardry they do, let alone in those bigass paws.
Space Paws TPS reports are spotless. One might say they are purfect.
Legit, that's my plan if i ever get forced to return to office for work.
Straight up fur suit every day. That's not even my thing. No idea where i'd get one or what they cost. I just figure, if they want to fuck with my day, they're going to get it right back with interest.
I agree with the sentiment wholeheartedly. Definitely not the wisest move to wear it to the airport unless you're wanting to have issues, though.
Why? I'd love to hear the logic here. Are people who actually bring bombs into planes known to wear shirts with the word "bomb" on it in an unrelated context?
I guess we're all just collectively this fucking stupid now, huh?
Can we not wear shirts with pictures of knives on them either? I'm certain it doesn't hold true for apparel with gun imagery. Not in the US.
I guess we're all just collectively this fucking stupid now, huh?
Pretty much.
You know it is not allowed to say the word bomb on a plane right? Pretty much same thing. It's not logical, no use looking for logic in it really.
Economy so bad Reddit admins need a second job as a flight attendant
As someone who got perma-banned recently for recommending that Andrew Tate get transferred to a Brazilian prison and tenderized, this is fucking hilariously accurate.
Woke Andrew Tate