this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
502 points (99.2% liked)

News

38539 readers
1967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't remove the video from showing.

A New Jersey man was on a flight traveling from Atlanta to Newark on June 4, 2026, while wearing a T-shirt that said, "Bombing kids is not self defense."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I agree with the sentiment wholeheartedly. Definitely not the wisest move to wear it to the airport unless you're wanting to have issues, though.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why? What specially is offensive?

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Please read any of the half dozen comments below that have explained this.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, because terrorists will wear a shirt with bomb written on it if they have one, of course

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

No, but that doesn't stop the TSA from acting like it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Why? I'd love to hear the logic here. Are people who actually bring bombs into planes known to wear shirts with the word "bomb" on it in an unrelated context?

I guess we're all just collectively this fucking stupid now, huh?

Can we not wear shirts with pictures of knives on them either? I'm certain it doesn't hold true for apparel with gun imagery. Not in the US.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I guess we're all just collectively this fucking stupid now, huh?

Pretty much.

You know it is not allowed to say the word bomb on a plane right? Pretty much same thing. It's not logical, no use looking for logic in it really.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You know it is not allowed to say the word bomb on a plane right? Pretty much same thing

It's not the same thing at all though.

You're allowed to wear a T-shirt that says "fire!" on it in a crowded theater.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The only reason I can imagine for banning the word bomb on a plane is that people don't want to think about bombs while flying. To people who think that way (not me) I don't see how you could convince them a shirt is totally different. Because again, none of it is logical.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 20 hours ago

The logic is that the TSA is constantly looking for ways to appear effective. Wearing a shirt that involves the words hijack or bomb or something along those lines is more or less an invitation to get hassled by them.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The logic is that there isn't any real logic to it.

Nobody would be stupid enough to actually do that but that doesn't matter. It makes you look "suspicious", and that's all the pretext that would be needed to detain, search, and harass you with enough plausible deniability to get away with it not being seen as abuse of power.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, it's definitely got a no-no word on it.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the problem with banning the words themselves.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I just watched Meet the Parents this weekend just for a nostalgia hit. That scene about him getting kicked off an airplane for saying "Bomb" cracked me up. He's like "I said I DIDN'T have a bomb! Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb ba-babomb! What if I was a Bombardier?"

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

My company "don't bomb the babies bath bombs" always has problems at security.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 24 points 1 day ago

there is a bakery in PA that has a pastry called a peanut butter bomb. It's on their t-shirts. An employee wore one to the airport; yeah, he was detained, and questioned, and things got a bit tense. He's pointing to the website, saying, "But it's right there! It's chocolate and peanut butter!" I think they eventually let him on the plane...