this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
443 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

20710 readers
678 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged, but keep it in good faith and never punch down.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 5 days ago (3 children)

9000 is a really fucking old teenager.

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's like being Gandalf of all teenagers.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“A wizard is never late, nor is she early, she arrives preci…”

Oh shut up Helen, you knew I was going to wear my leopard print and you wore yours today just so I would look like I’m copying you! Our friendship is so over!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They rounded down, she's actually 9017 years old.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I think someone mixed up the storage, and they accidentally recreated John Travolta from the Battlefield Earth movie?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s been a while since I’ve studied it, but IIRC skeletons of early humans show in general more traits we view as masculine, like stronger chins and a more jutting brow line, even in female skeletons. It was even more pronounced in male skeletons, but this is still pretty mild sexual dimorphism even among great apes (think male vs female gorillas, for example).

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Though, even being 9000, they would still be considered a "modern" human, correct? Having evolved roughly 300k years ago, I would think their traits would be far more similar to our own then "early" versions of our species

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AnchoriteMagus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why did you have to remind me?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

this feels like one of those shrink wrapped dinosaur situations. like they arent doing a good job estimating how her soft tissue would have been distributed at all. why are her eyebrows so low, why are her cheeks so lean, why is there so much tissue below her lips, why is her hairline so high and with a bit of a widows peak? it feels like they put a mans tissue distribution on a womans frame completely uncritically and called it good.

edit: i think the harsh drop lighting theyre displaying this under is making it way worse too. it might not look quite as bad with softer more diffuse lighting.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah this looks completely wrong to me... Like sure, they would look very different, but they wouldn't be indistinguishable from men. Even from an evolutionary perspective that's just silly.

Even today we have women that have "facial bone structures we associate with masculinity" as they describe. It's not like we are working blind and trying to reconstruct a dinosaur or an extraterrestrial. Though maybe for some scientists, women are similarly rare.

I looked up some examples of "masculine women faces" online in 2 minutes. Even though they look "masculine", they clearly don't look like Gigachad or whatever this reconstruction is.

example photos

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 12 points 4 days ago (5 children)

All three are beautiful. And in other news, I'm a gay enby.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Today, some women have very masculine features. You can find some of them on fashion show runways, for whatever reason.

This, by chance, is a skull with such features. This doesn't mean all women then had masculine features, the same way not all women today do.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Or maybe the scientist just sucks at portraits

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago
[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

well they always taught us in history class how greece was the hi mark of ancient culture.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago
[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is what the Trojan War was fought over

[–] groucho@retrolemmy.com 3 points 3 days ago

The face that launched a thousand ships.... away from it.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Idk about this team tbh. Avgi is certainly not impressed.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Does group perception of beauty change over time?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Funny, if you cut the hair I'd say it's Val Kilmer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Did Carrot Top forget to take his thyroid medication again?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

If this is a teenage girl, how the hell the grown up men looked like? I mean my masculinity is already hurt by this image alone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mother
Tell your children not to walk my way
Tell your children not to hear my words
What they mean
What they say
Mother

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm no anthropologist but wouldn't her skin be a lot darker? This feels like people making depictions of Jesus look like a modern European person.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Like everything in life, tl;dr it's complicated, but no doubt she got a little more sunkissed lmao.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah, one thing I've learned about human genetics is that the markers for skin color are wonky and unpredictable.

I just feel like it'd be safer to assume she was a lot darker given the recency of African diaspora, but again I am far from an expert so I could be totally off.

[–] shortypants@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looks like every bass player I’ve ever known.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

40% Heath Ledger 40% Val Kilmer 20% Rocky Dennis

[–] tomiant@piefed.world 7 points 4 days ago
[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All the cast of Odyssey should look like this

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Odyssey is much, much closer to now than to 9000 years ago

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’s that old “Cleopatra lived closer to modern day than the building of the pyramids. Ancient Egypt had archeologists who studied ancient Egypt” thing.

load more comments (1 replies)

It's OK, she's actually a 9000-year-old shapeshifting dragon.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nobody would be this mean about her appearance if she wasn't being lit in the most unflattering possible way

load more comments
view more: next ›