this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
454 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30318 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 57 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Congratulation to Melat Kiros, this just proves what I've so often claimed here on Lemmy.
That the best bet for change, is to become a member of the Democratic party, and help change it from within.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (30 children)

If only more young people saw this reality rather than the moronic:

"DEMS BAD! LET DEMS LOSE TO FASCIST TO TEACH DEMS LESSON! OH WAIT, WHY ARE WE NOW COMMITTING 500 MORE GENOCIDES AND NO LONGER HAVE FAIR ELECTIONS?"

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Losing affordable healthcare, and funneling even more wealth to the 1%, while making the economy worse both for working people and the country.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

The best bet for change is to run a democratic socialist platform with the local DSA community

Running as independent may be advantageous in some races

[–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At least while FPTP is still the main system of election in the US.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Yes, and Republicans will do absolutely zero to change that, because abusing the system is one of their main strategies.
And old school Democrats won't change it either for some reason, despite calling themselves democrats.
So it's a long process of first changing the Democratic party from within, and then hopefully get the power to modernize democracy in USA.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 7 points 6 days ago

https://www.vote.nyc/RankedChoiceVoting

New York City, long a Dem stronghold, has implemented ranked choice voting.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The company that fired her is now sweating that she'll be their Congressional Rep. I don't advocate for her to retaliate, that's MAGA nonsense, but I'd definitely let them know that I'm watching them.

Unless I knew about any nefarious dealings they may be up to, then I'd use my new power to send the attack dogs after them. Karma is what you get for being scum.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

oh yeah. i once got constructively dismissed at an accounting firm because i wasn't willing to help them commit fraud. the eeoc payment was nice, but what was better was getting their licensure yanked.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

A guy at my last job had a major, fundamental misunderstanding of how the local building code was updated annually. He, and the partner who said I was wrong for “insubordination” when I refused to do the work using outdated codes, ended up in front of the professional engineers board and had to formally make a plan to show how they would never make that mistake again. It wasn’t exactly license revoking, but it felt great to have started that process haha

The best part was that I know the firm’s code nerd was spoken to to tell me I was wrong and they sent out a company wide notice about making sure your code was updated. No one ever apologized to me. I only submitted the report after they let me go for “not being a good fit”.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The #1 rule of not getting caught doing crime is don't do 2 crimes at once. The in #2 rule is don't makes enemies of people that know where the bodies are buried. Sounds like you worked for idiots.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Not retaliating is how we got here. Either the next wave causes a red holocaust or you'll be ratcheted back the other way again.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

No. The socialist movement is not growing.

The democratic socialist movement is growing.

I'll leave you with my standard disclaimer:

Socialism refers to collective ownership of the means of production. Social democracy refers to a capitalist market economy supplemented by welfare programs, labor protections, and public services. The two terms are not interchangeable despite frequent misuse on the internet. You are describing and advocating for social democracy not socialism.

https://youtube.com/shorts/zMmjKRettxA

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dem soc =/= Soc dem

Democratic socialists are socialists, social democrats are not.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In a sense yes. Both Burnie and AOC describ themselves as democratic socialists but neither of them have ever advocated for the public ownership of production like in pure socialism. They have always supplimented they're political views along with democracy.

So simple calling them socialists is incorrect. Also keep in mind that both of them are part of the DNC.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bernie's actually not part of the DNC. He is registered as an independent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I believe neither of them are part of the DNC. They do caucus with the Democrats because the other option is the Republicans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

You literally said Democratic Socialism and linked a quote contrasting Socialism (generally) to Social Democracy, not Democratic Socialism.

[–] Teepo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why does this post start talking about democratic socialism then link to a description of social democracy? Those are not the same thing.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In America, liberalism is called leftism, leftism is called fascism, and fascism is called bipartisan common-sense politics.

The nuances between Social democracy and Democratic socialism never stands a chance in public discourse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Leave it to the USA to name two completely unrelated things the same name, because it hates both equally and doesn't distinguish either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

At this point, I'm just celebrating because I would take even democratic socialism in this country at this point. Also, I guarantee the majority of people aren't gonna care to distinguish the 2, sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The real travesty hear is that there was a 29-year incumbent in the first place. Congress desperately needs term limits.

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How TF do you have a 29 year incumbent??

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 37 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Mitch McConnell has been a senator in Kentucky for 41 years. Its ridiculous that there are no term limits for these people.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 days ago

There has never been a moment of my life he hasn’t cast a shadow over. I’m gonna need a few hospitals after celebrating

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

MF love boomers. Our governor was a strong 20 year run in office, most your senators have been in Washington since the 80's-90's. Yo these people die in their seats of power, thats how...

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 11 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I suppose it's the fault of the constituents for continuing to vote the same person in over and over again. Or is it that you don't have any other choices?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Laziness. And fear of change.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

It is not that there are not other possibilities. I don't really understand how it's now become fashionable on the left to now grumble and carp about "term limits" and engaging in lots of ageism, but what it is fairly obvious is the people doing the most complaining about it are not involved in running in primaries themselves.

I am also highly dubious of anything magical about term limits or having younger people in office.

In fact, I think it's a rather obvious red herring to have everyone engage in some good old fashioned divide-n-conquer, this time divided along generational boundaries. In this particular redux, we now have social media to turbo charge things, instead of the boomers vs. the GI and Silent Generations, it's now Gen Z and Gen Y pitched against boomers. Yawn. I guess it's as predictable as the tides but the people this is mostly aimed at have not been around long enough to know the game.

The fact that so many seem to be fooled by this, especially on the supposed left? Definitely disappointing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 6 days ago

Damn, that Zionist shill had occupied that seat as long as Melat has been alive!

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was legit excited to vote for her. I’m cautiously optimistic to see how she does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Shitlibs beware

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

hahahahah boy I hope the radical left is as radical and violent as the republicans imagine them to be.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hope they can pull it off in November. That word "socialist" is like Pavlov's bell, triggering the average American to vote Republican.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›