MonkRome

joined 3 years ago
[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

How fragile is your ego when you have to say "nuh uh" to something so unambiguous?

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Edit: removing most details, not needed.

Don't be a divider, be a helper.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Honestly not enough context here to answer. Are they a former close friend, distant aquintence, former love interest? Do you have a pattern of long period of time with no catch up? A lot of thing in relationships are contextual based on set expectations.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not once did anyone in the supposedly Jewish side of his family point out that he had a SS tattoo on his chest?

I'm Jewish, if I saw that on his chest I wouldn't have any idea what it means. How could I inform him of his mistake if I didn't know. And if I did know I would have been steering clear of him, not talking to him about his tattoo.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd argue at the state level they often have, it just gets lost in the noise. At least in Wisconsin and Minnesota, where I've been.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Solar is easily the cheapest energy and its getting cheaper every year. Repairing a coal power plant is not as attractive as a much cheaper to run biofuel plant. Etc.

Here in germany we have investors abandoning half build solar parks cause they aren't profitable anymore.

Without knowing the specifics, I doubt profitability was the issue. Once a solar panel is installed it is pure profit with minimal maintenance. Companies get in trouble when they commit way more to a project than they can raise in investments. It seems more likely that is what happened.

Lastly your looking at a few countries that are pushing back with what amounts to theater (Germany is 56% renewable energy). Meanwhile the largest producer of energy in the world, China, is staying committed to converting to renewables and s also 56% of the way there.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sure but the problem would be 100 times worse if fossil fuel adoption doest decline. Its good news that we seem to be on the way to shifting our behavior.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'm concerned about climate change. But if you ask most people how much progress we've made they would say "barely any". That belief that we can't do it, is the main thing aside from public policy slowing us down. When people think things are hopeless, they often don't see the point in fighting or changing their behavior. I also think most people don't realize that renewable energy adoption has accelerated so quickly the last few years. Every year we have had massive growth over last year in adoption.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

iirc ~1/4 of the worlds energy production is renewable. More than 90% of all new electricity capacity worldwide came from renewable sources in 2024. Doomers want you to believe it can't happen again while we are in the very decade that is likely to change the world. Public policy doesn't even matter at this point, renewable energy is cheaper, so nearly all new investments are in renewables.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I seriously doubt anyone keeps records of dog deaths like they do humans. But bear hunters use dogs to hunt them because they scare and corner them, by running them up a tree. American black bears are afraid of everything.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In the last 126 years there was only 61 possible legitimate cases of an american black bear killing a human, and even some of those cases have been called into question. American black bears are some of the most passive animals, they hate confrontation and will basically always flee. Even if hungry and even if their babies are in danger. The scariest thing they will do is bluff charge while vocalizing and the run off.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is a difference between ending colonialism and removing people from land. I find it absolutely crazy that people that have no issue with immigration anywhere else in the world think it is suddenly bad there. The issue isn't with Jews simply existing in the middle east, its with Israel's colonialism and genocide of Palestine. Isreal can stop existing without the genocide of the Jewish people. Removing all Jews is evil, just as removing all Palestinians is evil, they are both genocide.

The issue is one of power, colonialism, and Israel's genocide. Those can change without causing another genocide.

view more: next ›