Keeponstalin

joined 2 years ago
[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ethnic Cleansing is fundamental to Zionism

Zionism’s aims in Palestine, its deeply-held conviction that the Land of Israel belonged exclusively to the Jewish people as a whole, and the idea of Palestine’s “civilizational barrenness" or “emptiness” against the background of European imperialist ideologies all converged in the logical conclusion that the native population should make way for thenewcomers.

The idea that the Palestinian Arabs must find a place for themselves elsewhere was articulated early on. Indeed, the founder of the movement, Theodor Herzl, provided an early reference to transfer even before he formally outlined his theory of Zionist rebirth in his Judenstat.

An 1895 entry in his diary provides in embryonic form many of the elements that were to be demonstrated repeatedly in the Zionist quest for solutions to the “Arab problem ”-the idea of dealing with state governments over the heads of the indigenous population, Jewish acquisition of property that would be inalienable, “Hebrew Land" and “Hebrew Labor,” and the removal of the native population.

Settlements and Occupation

Israel justifies the settlements and military bases in the West Bank in the name of Security. However, the reality of the settlements on-the-ground has been the cause of violent resistance and a significant obstacle to peace, as it has been for decades.

This type of settlement, where the native population gets 'Transferred' to make room for the settlers, is a long standing practice.

The mass ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948:

Further, declassified Israeli documents show that the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip were deliberately planned before being executed in 1967:

While the peace process was exploited to continue de-facto annexation of the West Bank via Settlements

The settlements are maintained through a violent apartheid that routinely employs violence towards Palestinians and denies human rights like water access, civil rights, etc. This kind of control gives rise to violent resistance to the Apartheid occupation, jeopardizing the safety of Israeli civilians.

The apartheid regime is based on organized, systemic violence against Palestinians, which is carried out by numerous agents: the government, the military, the Civil Administration, the Supreme Court, the Israel Police, the Israel Security Agency, the Israel Prison Service, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and others. Settlers are another item on this list, and the state incorporates their violence into its own official acts of violence. Settler violence sometimes precedes instances of official violence by Israeli authorities, and at other times is incorporated into them. Like state violence, settler violence is organized, institutionalized, well-equipped and implemented in order to achieve a defined strategic goal.

Apartheid Evidence

Amnesty Report

Human Rights Watch Report

B'TSelem Report with quick Explainer

Visualizing the Ethnic Cleansing

Peace Process and Solution

Both Hamas and Fatah have agreed to a Two-State solution based on the 1967 borders for decades. Oslo and Camp David were used by Israel to continue settlements in the West Bank and maintain an Apartheid, while preventing any actual Two-State solution

How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

One State Solution, Foreign Affairs

Hamas proposed a full prisoner swap as early as Oct 8th, and agreed to the US proposed UN Permanent Ceasefire Resolution. Additionally, Hamas has already agreed to no longer govern the Gaza Strip, as long as Palestinians receive liberation and a unified government can take place.

Historian Works on the History

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The PA is Counter Insurgency, an arm of the Israeli Apartheid apparatus. Still sounds they only care about how that negatively affects Israel

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

The mycelial network is strong with this one

Live long and prosper, Stamets 🖖

I'm so sick of the Zionism that some of these mods exhibit (mostly .world or .de from my experience)

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Did you watch the video or just react to the title?

This is absolutely a fracture within the MAGA base and pundits

 

Including any opposition from the left

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's an emancipatory slogan.

Now you're repeatedly refusing to engage with the sources because you know they prove you wrong

It's saying 'Palestine will be free.'

You're the one falsely attributing that as "all this land will be ours" while also falsely implying that 'ours' would exclude Jewish people. You're the one falsely conflating anti-zionism with antisemitism.

Again, actually taking the sources seriously clarifies all of this.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

It's calling for control of all the land "from the river to the sea". Which means murder or displacement of the other side

No, it's pretty clear. It means an end to Apartheid and equal rights. That means equal rights for everyone. Right of return across all of historic Palestine. That means coexistence. Not mass killings and mass displacement like what is currently happening

It's a One-state reality already. Like with South Africa, ending the Apartheid did not mean the murder or mass displacement of the white settlers. That mentality of mass murder and mass displacement is entirely the projection of the sick supremacist mindset of settler colonialists.

And the Israelis use it to mean the same thing, which is something a Zionist would never tell you.

Zionists have had zero issues calling for the complete expulsion of Palestinians. That's been the case from the origins of Zionism to present day.

The difference here is that Israel has the power to genocide and is actually committing genocide. That doesn't make anyone else calling for genocide okay. There is no good side in this fight.

The Palestinian slogan is, once again, not a call for genocide. You have five articles to learn more, why don't you take them seriously?

You still gonna call me a Zionist? Anyone who doesn't agree with you 100%?

Just stop repeating Zionist misinformation, it's not that difficult, especially when provided sources.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This seems perfect for the trade offer meme

Edit: my amateur attempt

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (5 children)

It is an emancipatory slogan that calls for an end to apartheid and for equal rights.

Yousef Munayyer, head of the Palestine-Israel program at the Arab Center Washington D.C., has written extensively about the meaning of the slogan before and since Hamas's attacks on Oct. 7, which led to Israel's current bombardment of the Gaza Strip.

"It's an expression of Palestinian nationalism and it's an expression of a demand for Palestinian freedom or self-determination," said Waxman. "I think Palestinian self-determination need not come at the expense of Jewish self-determination. Nor do I think Palestinian freedom has to be considered a threat to Jewish rights."

Simply put, the majority of Palestinians who use this phrase do so because they believe that, in 10 short words, it sums up their personal ties, their national rights and their vision for the land they call Palestine. And while attempts to police the slogan’s use may come from a place of genuine concern, there is a risk that tarring the slogan as antisemitic – and therefore beyond the pale – taps into a longer history of attempts to silence Palestinian voices.

The use of the phrase “from the river to the sea” has come under particular scrutiny in the last three months. When Palestinians, or anyone on the left, has used the phrase to demand a free Palestine—as in the popular chant, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”—those on the right have disingenuously argued that it is calling for the death of all Jewish people in Israel.

In 2021, the Palestinian-American writer Yousef Munayyer argued that those who saw genocidal ambition in the phrase, or indeed an unambiguous desire for the destruction of Israel, did so due to their own Islamophobia.

It was instead, he argued, merely a way to express a desire for a state in which “Palestinians can live in their homeland as free and equal citizens, neither dominated by others nor dominating them”.

Preventing any possibility of a Palestinian state has always been Israel’s policy, one that the settlement building in the Occupied Territories is meant to ensure. This policy has been intensified under Benjamin Netanyahu, who in January 2024 publicly vowed to resist any attempt to create a Palestinian state and to maintain Israeli control from the river to the sea.

It is often maintained that the slogan ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ expresses a genocidal and antisemitic intention. But this is generally not the case. On the contrary, the slogan has historically been used to articulate a wide variety of political strategies for Palestinian liberation

Denying such demands seems as self-evident to most Israeli Jews as the air they breathe. It is this denial that has led to the dehumanization of Palestinians and has culminated in the genocidal mood that is prevailing in Israeli Jewish society today and in the assault taking place now in Gaza. This should be viewed as the real problem and not the legitimate chant of ‘from the river to the sea: Palestine will be free’.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

We look forward to the following:

1- To initiate, collectively and in agreement, urgent measures aimed at halting the war of extermination in Gaza, with rescuing the victims and preventing the continuation of the bloodshed as a top priority, by forming an Arab-international coalition to stop the extermination, which will pressure the occupation and its supporters using all possible tools to halt the war of extermination.

2- Using all Arab pressure cards, including activating the Joint Defense Agreement, using oil as a weapon, imposing comprehensive Arab sanctions on the occupying state, and urgent action with the international community to impose severe sanctions on the Israeli entity to compel it to immediately halt its war of genocide and lift the unjust siege on the Gaza Strip.

  1. Providing urgent humanitarian aid to our besieged people in the Gaza Strip, particularly to hospitals, medical clinics, civil defense, and internally displaced persons within the Strip, securing tents and prefabricated homes, and establishing a reconstruction fund.

  2. Unifying the Arab and Islamic stance in confronting the ongoing Israeli aggression against our nation, and agreeing on a joint action plan that includes a set of Arab-Islamic sanctions against the occupying state and the countries, entities, and companies that support and partner with it, including severing all forms of relations with this usurping entity that not only threatens, but also blatantly attacks a large number of countries and peoples in the region, brazenly threatens their national security, and acts as a rogue terrorist state that does not abide by the law.

  3. Adopting a unified strategy to protect Jerusalem from Judaization, Al-Aqsa Mosque from division, and the West Bank from annexation, displacement, and uprooting.

  4. Strengthening Arab and Islamic solidarity to consolidate unity and ensure that the nation's major issues are not left to be subjected to Israeli massacres and attacks, amidst talk of the so-called "Greater Israel" dream, which aims to control Arab lands and dominate and control the region.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (12 children)

Not surprising, he also permabanned me from WorldNews for debunking Zionist misinformation, banned outlets such as Drop Site News and Zeteo, and defended his practice of censoring the emancipatory slogan 'from the river to the sea Palestine will be free' by quoting incredibly racist liberal Zionists

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

This is certainly a bad idea

 

Hasan Piker covers the news of increasing threats of violence from the right, both from normies all the way up to political activists and elected officials in the wake of Charlie Kirk's passing.

 

Negotiator survived, 5 dead

 

Charlie Kirk has been shot at a public speaking event in Utah and confirmed dead

 

This annual People’s Conference for Palestine is organized by Palestinian leaders in the movement, with a political program designed to address the current political moment and to bring together critical voices in the struggle. With Gaza as our guide, people from across North America will come together for a weekend to continue building and strengthening the movement for Palestinian liberation in North America.

https://peoplesconferenceforpalestine.org/

 

Hasan reacts to friend of the show, Adam Friedland, who invited the NY Democratic Congressman, Ritchie Torres, who has received over $1.4 mil from AIPAC, onto his show to talk about Israel

view more: next ›