Buffalox

joined 2 years ago
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I must admit I was a bit worried about the extra time for the trip because of charging, but after this trip, although the trip was maybe about ½ an hour extra each way, I found that it doesn't really matter, the silence of the electric makes it much more relaxing than any ICE car I've ever owned. So much that the family we visited could tell we were less tired from the trip than usual. We usually have about 10 minutes break midway, to get a sandwich and switch driver. I think the charging made it so we weren't so much in a hurry to finish the break. All in all way more relaxing way to drive, we also used to drive 140 km/h in the ICE car, but with the EV we limited it to 120 km/h, because we figured the higher speed would just mean more charging time.

So in short I agree, that all my fears regarding longer trips have evaporated. Also I can see the point some reviewers make, that with faster charging a bigger battery isn't as important as it used to be. Our car has a 77 kWh battery, and can charge at 125 kWh. but the real charging peaked at 113 kWh, and we broke it off at about 65% because the rate begins to drop to around 70 kWh at that point. So we typically charged from 15-20% to 60-70% using 2 stops. This was at temperatures around 5° C out and 8° C home, There was also strong wind out, so we charged 2 times both ways. Out because of unfavorable weather, and home because we started with only a 70% charge.
On the way out the efficiency was 20% worse than back home, so the poor weather with strong head wind and lower temperature was a major influence.

But I think to drive the car close to or even below 10% requires that you know your car in such situations, and are confident you can find a charger in time.
This was our first such trip, I bet we can do better next time. 😀
The car is a VW iD.4 Pro Performance Tech 2021 for anybody curious. Battery state 90%.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

EV owners are saving upwards of 60 per cent on fuel compared to their old petrol cars. At $2.54 a litre for premium, that stops being a brochure stat and starts being a survival strategy.

We just had our first 1000 km round trip with our EV. We spent about 40€ on fast charging, and home charging was mostly free because it was from our solar panels, but would be equivalent to about 8€ for a full charge if we had to pay the night rate.
Then we topped the car while visiting, but that was with only a 6A cable, so not much was charged, let's say about 3€.
So all in all about €51, despite fast chargers are a bit expensive compared to home charging. Also we arrived home with enough charge for more than 100km left on the battery.

With our old ICE car that would have been 155 € in gas/petrol.

So even using the "expensive" fast chargers our EV allowed us to drive at a third the cost of gas/petrol. But in everyday driving the savings are way bigger, even if we had to pay normal prices and didn't have our solar panels. The savings are at least twice of using fast chargers.
But gas/petrol is also almost 50% more expensive here than the price they list for Australia.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

OK so maybe they haven't got subsidies from the Chinese government, which is why they pay zero extra% duty.
As I stated earlier, the duty is based on the level of government subsidies Chinese factories have received. Where USA just has put a 150% tariff on everything car related from China. So I maintain EU and USA are not the same regarding duty/tariff, and EU and China are not the same regarding government subsidies, China subsidize Chinese car makers directly, while EU subsidies benefit all EV car makers disregarding country of origin.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Wow they did not last long.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

More than one in three Americans support insanity running the federal government!
USA is both despicable, and the clown of the world.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It is not who owns the company that matters, but that they are made in China, and how much the factory has been subsidiced. The Tavascan is built on a Chinese owned factory, where VW has a minority ownership.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I was not aware of the 10% base duty for all cars into EU.
But the rates you state are general for a brand, but do not account for per model negotiations:

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/eu-tariffs-imports-china-made-evs-2026-02-11/

Carmakers can now negotiate tariff exemptions for individual electric models imported from China.

Cupra Tavascan has achieved a 0% duty, and Tesla is 7.8%.
I suspect several of the more popular Chinese models, have negotiated lower rates too.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Interesting how different Ryzen and Core Ultra have become, Ryzen with 6 dual threaded cores, and Intel with 6 P cores and 12 E cores that are all single threaded. Intel clearly win the overall performance here, which they should with 3 times as many cores and 50% higher power consumption, and that considered Intel multi threading is a bit underwhelming compared to AMD IMO.

With the 50% higher power draw om the Intel, you need a way better cooler, or it will get noisy under high loads.
I guess both CPU's are good options, but personally I kind of favor the AMD as a more elegant solution IMO, and also longer motherboard lifespan, that probably will make it possible to make a cheap upgrade in a couple of years, just swapping the CPU for something twice as powerful.

On my current but ancient 350B motherboard, I'm on my third updated Ryzen CPU! Starting at a modest Ryzen R5 1600, and now I have an R7 5800X. Which is still modest, but good enough for me.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Ai work is usually very low precision.

Apparently 😋

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I don't understand how FP4 is useful for anything, unless I misunderstand it only uses 4 bits, and with 4 bit's you can only have 16 different values?! With FP4 this is even reduced to 15 values as the first digit signifies negative, so 0000 and 1000 are both zero.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minifloat

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

If you are in the USA, I think so. Probably including January and February.
The illegal war against Iran however, could throw the global economy into a recession very quickly.
And the only ones to blame are Israel and USA.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

How does Trump idiocy suddenly reflect on Iran losing the narrative?
Seems to me that Iran has taken control of the narrative, while USA and Israel are losing it completely.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSOPtIXP9eU&t=32s

My comment that I can't see if I am not logged in to Youtube:

@buffalox8492 for 2 timer siden (redigeret) How is that piece of sh*t car street legal in Norway?
The design conflicts with standards that protect soft/vulnerable road users as well as other cars and the driver, The sharp edges are a hazard to soft traffic, and, the extreme rigidity lacking crumbling zones and weight of the car is an insane danger to everybody, even including the driver. And there are numerous safety issues with the technology that you depend on to drive it.and something as simple as the lights on the car are simply designed wrong for safety!
I thought Norway observed EU standards, but apparently not. Shame on them for allowing this car on their roads. Norwegians should demand to have it removed ASAP! For their own safety. Be warned, This is probably the worst most dangerous car to drive in modern times!

This video explains some of the problems that make it illegal in UK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F72TTdT344k&t=609s

 

Across its full range, Tesla sold just 83 vehicles in total in January 2026, marking an 88 percent decline compared to the same period last year.

 

Article in Danish, please use your favorite translator.
I tried to make a Google translate link, but it absolutely craps out? But the one built in Firefox works OK.

 

With little innovation and lacking new models, Tesla has decided to cut prices again, this time the price of the model 3 is cut by 10%.

This may be to regain some of the lost marketshare. But it may also be because they simply have too much stock.
Cutting production is expensive, and obviously producing just to stockpile unsold products is expensive too.

I have no doubt that this price cut is an act of desperation, not a result of being competitive. Tesla is losing money no matter if they cut production or they cut the prices or they stock up on unsold product.

Whichever is the case, I had a good laugh that the Swasticars are so hard to sell Tesla has to cut prices yet again, and that's despite inflation.

Allegedly the profitability on a Tesla car was recently estimated at just 2%, so cutting the price by 10% is going to hurt for them.

Here's a link to a story about it by a major news outlet in Denmark:
https://www.bt.dk/udland/tesla-med-bombe-dumper-prisen-igen

139
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
 

Anton Gerashchenko on Bluesky story about a strike at a nuclear plant with documentation:

https://bsky.app/profile/antongerashchenko.bsky.social/post/3m56ndvbujs2i
The post contains video from the situation.

As I've been posting many times before, many workers in Russia are behind on payments. People working in factories being 3 months behind is not uncommon.
Anna from Ukraine explains the situation here. She is a good source IMO, because her English is excellent, and being Ukrainian she understands Russian, and makes frequent news updates about the Ukrainian war from various perspectives.

Anna Danylchuk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6EQ0ubmsIk

Inside Russia on youtube was first to report on the Russian population beginning to have had enough to a degree they are actually beginning to complain:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoR5_bJywWQ

I've claimed before I don't think Putin will last through the winter, and I see this as the first signs that the Russian people is about to have had enough.
The story reported by Anna and Gerashchenko tells that the workers are at least 2 months behind on wages, they were promised transportation to work, something that is important because of the lack of fuel, and public transport becoming unreliable. But they do not get the promised transportation. They were also promised 1 hot meal per day, but do not receive that either.
Finally in their homes, they are out of water and heat.

This is the economic and infrastructure collapse many have predicted was inevitable, that is now beginning to really show. And it isn't even really winter yet!

PS: The moderators removed my previous post with false accusations, so here it is posted again according to their demands.

 

1: 12.992 electric cars sold, the most electric cars sold in one month.
2: 91% market share with private buyers.
3: 73% market total market share.

 

English translation by Firefox:
FDM warns of errors in several models from Tesla, and FDM has now been successful by the Danish Road Safety Authority. FDM has previously described that there are several cases of significant veil in the rear suspension and in the steering column of the popular Model 3. Photo: Mike Blake / Ritzau Scanpix Today at 8pm. 11.07 Updated Today at 9pm. 11.08 By Ritzau

The Danish Road Safety Authority has stated that the motorists' interest organization, FDM, rightly did not approve two Tesla Model 3 by sight after the car owners had independently complained about the demand for omsyn.

FDM said in a statement.

In both cases, the sight results were due to "too much veil in bushings in rear-wheel suspension".

However, Tesla found no faults and thought the electric cars should have been approved, which led to complaints and the Traffic Agency's review. Many Teslas have "veil in the bushing"

The agency concludes that the cars had a significant veil and that the vision had been carried out correctly in both cases.

Earlier in the year, the FDM warned that there are many Teslas that have veils in bushings in the rear-wheel suspension and in the steering column. See also FDM comes with call for Tesla owners

Veils in rear suspensions mean that there is a looseness or abnormal movement in the parts that connect the car's rear wheel to the car itself.

This applies to both the Model 3 and Model Y. According to FDM, around 37,000 Model 3 and more than 40,000 Model Y have been registered in Denmark. The error is seen on newer cars

Usually you first see the problem on older cars, which have driven many kilometers, but FDM has seen several models with the error early in the life expectancy of the cars.

It creates doubts about the safety of cars, writes FDM, who has contacted Tesla to get the company to solve the problems. See also Tesla gets fined for flawed marketing

"We expect Tesla to help drivers, as it is not fair that the consumer has an additional cost of repair and possibly overhaul, because the car has a fault it shouldn't have," said Lone Otto, area manager in FDM's technical advice.

At the beginning of the year, FDM said that almost one in four Model 3 from the year 2020, which last year was for inspection, failed - among other things because of veils.

For other electric cars, the dump percentage was nine.

 

English translation by Firefox:
FDM warns of errors in several models from Tesla, and FDM has now been successful by the Danish Road Safety Authority. FDM has previously described that there are several cases of significant veil in the rear suspension and in the steering column of the popular Model 3. Photo: Mike Blake / Ritzau Scanpix Today at 8pm. 11.07 Updated Today at 9pm. 11.08 By Ritzau

The Danish Road Safety Authority has stated that the motorists' interest organization, FDM, rightly did not approve two Tesla Model 3 by sight after the car owners had independently complained about the demand for omsyn.

FDM said in a statement.

In both cases, the sight results were due to "too much veil in bushings in rear-wheel suspension".

However, Tesla found no faults and thought the electric cars should have been approved, which led to complaints and the Traffic Agency's review. Many Teslas have "veil in the bushing"

The agency concludes that the cars had a significant veil and that the vision had been carried out correctly in both cases.

Earlier in the year, the FDM warned that there are many Teslas that have veils in bushings in the rear-wheel suspension and in the steering column. See also FDM comes with call for Tesla owners

Veils in rear suspensions mean that there is a looseness or abnormal movement in the parts that connect the car's rear wheel to the car itself.

This applies to both the Model 3 and Model Y. According to FDM, around 37,000 Model 3 and more than 40,000 Model Y have been registered in Denmark. The error is seen on newer cars

Usually you first see the problem on older cars, which have driven many kilometers, but FDM has seen several models with the error early in the life expectancy of the cars.

It creates doubts about the safety of cars, writes FDM, who has contacted Tesla to get the company to solve the problems. See also Tesla gets fined for flawed marketing

"We expect Tesla to help drivers, as it is not fair that the consumer has an additional cost of repair and possibly overhaul, because the car has a fault it shouldn't have," said Lone Otto, area manager in FDM's technical advice.

At the beginning of the year, FDM said that almost one in four Model 3 from the year 2020, which last year was for inspection, failed - among other things because of veils.

For other electric cars, the dump percentage was nine.

 

Todays numbers June 5th 2025. The official numbers on Russian losses released by the Ukrainian military general staff.
Source: t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/25142

view more: next ›