That's OK, it looks very interesting. 👍
Buffalox
Joke aside, that's kind of the vibe it gives off.
Better to live to fight another day IMO. I will strongly discourage anyone from going on hunger strike, it will more likely than not ruin your health for the rest of your life, and it will also shorten your life, if you don't die outright while striking.
True but that was a first and it was bigger and part of simultaneous demonstrations, and it broke with dogma of women being weak. So probably way bigger story for the press back then in the early 1900's.
Today hunger strikes very often don't get much attention, in this case, it is close to game over for these people.
And she earned every dollar of it fair and square, contrary to all those lazy ass musicians playing at your local cafe who can't afford health care.
/s
So I suppose suspected Republican will be reason enough to kill Americans in other countries now?
I don't see how Republicans can reasonably argue against that, since they after all are part of a war crime cult now.
We may accidentally take out a few non Republicans, but hey that's the times we live in now, as they are defined by USA.
Funny then how your previous comment is completely disconnected from the real problem.
I think I'll just block you, because you are too weird for me.
It says in the description:
Our Website: http://www.madmanfilms.com.au/
But I can't find the movie there?
Enron was cooking the books hiding huge deficits, and spending the money from the workers pension funds, so no Nvidia isn't Enron, but that doesn't mean it's all good.
Enron was the absolute worst, only matched by the Bernie Madoff pyramid scheme and the Bankman Fried crypto fraud.
Saying you are better than that is a very bad look.
I don't think you understand the problem, because lower is absolutely worse. A small decline in population is fine, the world probably has too many people already. But a steep decline like this is catastrophic for a country.
The fertility rate required to maintain population is around 2.1, having it at only 0.8 is really bad, making the South Korean population basically on a path to extinction within a few hundred years.
The principle of doing it yes, the way of doing it no.
That's for 2025.
So 3 cent decline for the dollar for 2026, that is pretty stable if that holds.
The headline must refer to what has already happened, but then why is it "on track" instead of it being already a fact?
Or does the author not believe the Wall Street banks?
Anywho I don't believe the dollar will only decline 3 cents against the Euro in 2026.
The American economy would clearly be in declining growth already, if it wasn't for the AI bubble. I suspect this to become clearer when job numbers for January and February 2026 are released.
The completely irresponsible federal budget for 2026 probably won't help either, and the Trump administration is almost guaranteed to make things worse as they continue their crazy policies, with or without Trump, I don't think that really matters much. The rest of the administration is as crazy as Trump is.