[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

That's a very cool looking desktop. Well done. 👍

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Shame reddit didn’t have the same amount of people jump ship like when everyone left Digg

For me that would mostly be schadenfreude, people use all kinds of social media I am not at all involved with, and I've stopped caring about it.
The way Reddit is run is all about monetization and stock value now, I seriously doubt they can do anything to attract me again. But it's better that certain people stay over there IMO.

I've contributed to "Fedihosting Foundation .world group" and I'm considering monthly contribution, as I do use it on a daily basis.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

It honestly look inaccurate to me, so I downvoted it as IMO misleading.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I am very unsure that planet picture is real, I don't think they can get that kind of detail even with James Webb telescope. It's also not described below the picture what the actual source is.
Seems extremely misleading to include that picture claiming to "look" at James Webb images.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This was very informative and interesting to me, Anders Puck Nielsen explains why the "tactical significant results" Russia has achieved at Kharkiv may not mean as much as we might think.

Important knowledge for us that are not savvy in military expressions.

But the part afterwords is even more interesting IMO, about how Russia might not even have a strategy to win this war.

So I thought this would be interesting to others too.

-Enjoy.

52

Russia has launched an offensive into the Kharkiv region, and it has created a lot of alarmist news reports. In reality it is difficult to see what Russia's plan is, and it is not self-evident that it is a smart use of resources. In this video I discuss whether we might be seeing a return to the fragmented command structures that Russia had in the beginning of the war.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wow they are actually copying what digg did, and expecting a different outcome.

Edit: Changed DIGG to digg for correctness.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Move to Europe, that NDA isn't legal here, which makes the whole thing void.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Great, I hope you are right, we need to enable Ukraine to finish this.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

This is a pretty gutsy move by Estonia if they do that. Estonia is a small country with most of its border towards Russia. They have little chance to defend themselves if Russia is stupid enough to decide to invade.

Obviously being a NATO member is the best protection there is for Estonia, but does chapter 5 still work, if Estonia sends personel officially to Ukraine to participate in the defense of Ukraine, even if it isn't on the front?

I hope we will see this happen soon, I am pretty sure that if Estonia does it, other countries will follow. That's the way it's been with everything else. If one country takes the lead others follow.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It's literally the fist sentence of the article:

Tesla might be dropping Steam support

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A decline is ALWAYS relative to something, otherwise it wouldn't make sense. So what is it really that you mean?

Intel used to be the undisputed leader both on CPU design and production process. Those positions are both lost, Intel also always used to have huge profits, but has had deficits lately, that used to be absolutely unheard of. They have lost both their economic and technological lead and they have lost marketshare, So how is that not a decline by every measure?

73
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world

My old $200 Motorola G9 Power phone lasted almost 4 years with only very minor scratches. Obviously in that period I have dropped it a few times getting out of the car, where the phone sometimes work itself out of my pant pocket while I drive, and then it slips out when I get out of the car. But no problem on my previous phones, despite the Moto had cheap Panda glass front.

Then I bought my $800 glass back Xiaomi 13T Pro in January, and I loved the phone for the camera and good specs. But alas after only 4 months, and single drop of just 30 cm while sitting on the porch, the glass back immediately cracked! The back now looks like an ugly mess, and the high water resistance is very likely gone too.

For sure the last time I buy a phone with a glass back!!!

I wonder why glass back is so popular, and I curse the media for reviewing the Samsung Galaxy S2 as "feeling a bit cheap", because the back was synthetic, and drop tests showed it was 10 times as durable as the iPhone with its glass back.

Samsung did it right in the beginning, glass backs are a curse.

PS: I don't use condoms for my phones, if they need that for daily use, it's an obvious design flaw!!!

The glass back is supposedly there to give a premium feel to the phone. But because it's fragile, people have to use a cover, but with the cover, the premium feel of a glass back is gone anyways?
How is glass back not a design flaw?

EDIT FOR CLARIFICATION:

I am not clumsy, that's why I believe the phone should be able to last without cover. This was the first time the phone slid out of my packet, and I've NEVER dropped it out of my hands. One 30 cm slip and it's broken. Where for instance my Moto had maybe 4-6 in all over the years, and remained unscathed, apart from some tiny scratches.
The sliding out of pocket does occur maybe a couple of times per year, but it's a low drop, and the phone should absolutely be able to handle that tiny drop, as it's an item for everyday use.
I've also never had problems with scratches on my screen on any phone, which is the reason people use screen protectors I guess, which I don't either, because they are ugly, for instance they create a tiny ring around the camera, and they feel awful IMO, my phone came with it, and it took exactly 10 seconds for me to decide to remove it, because I could feel the edge of the screen protector when using the phone.
But please stop with the dropping my phone regularly comments! Just because I dropped my Moto a few times (slid out of pocket) over almost 4 years! Always from low height, which it should be able to handle a few times.

69
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

Profits were expected to be halved from the 2022 1.2 tn Rubles, but instead they made a loss in 2023 of 629bn Rubles or £5.5bn.

25
submitted 3 weeks ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
64
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

It used to be very convenient that when searching for something that had a geographic location, Google searches used to show a small map which linked to Google maps when pressed.
Now all I get i a tiny useless map, that doesn't have any of the feature of Google maps, and often I don't even get that.
Anyone know why that is? And if there is a fix?
I use Firefox, but I'm guessing it's independent of browser, unless Google is up to their shenanigans again.
I've added Google maps as search option, which luckily is dead easy in Firefox to do. At the same time I added Open Street Map, to minimize Google map use to maybe show them they are losing traffic.

EDIT:

I think this is the reason as u/garrett@lemm.ee writes:

If you’re in Europe, it may be due to the DMA.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/pixels/article/2024/03/06/digital-markets-act-how-the-way-you-use-google-maps-and-messenger-is-changing_6591969_13.html

You may also have noticed something new on Google, when looking for the address of a place: It’s now impossible to click on the map that appears in your search results.

Google is one of the “gatekeepers” according to the DMA (Digital Markets Act). The law recently went into effect. It is supposed to lessen the amount of preferential treatment the big tech companies give themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act

24
submitted 4 months ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
41
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

The total combat losses of the enemy from 02.24.22 to 01.20.24 approximately amounted to:

personnel - about 375,270 (+750) people,
tanks ‒ 6171 (+4) units,
armored combat vehicles ‒ 11,455 (+10) units,
artillery systems - 8868 (+14) units,
MLRS – 967 (+1) units,
air defense equipment ‒ 654 (+0) units,
aircraft – 331 (+0) units,
helicopters – 324 (+0) units,
UAVs of the operational-tactical level - 6934 (+5),
cruise missiles – 1818 (+0),
ships/boats ‒ 23 (+0) units,
submarines – 1 (+0) units,
automotive equipment and tank trucks – 11,848 (+17) units,
special equipment ‒ 1389 (+5)

The data is being verified.

Beat the occupier! Together we will win! Our strength is in the truth!

Source Ministry of Defense of Ukraine : https://www.mil.gov.ua/news/2024/01/20/ponad-375-tisyach-osib-bilshe-50-tisyach-odinicz-bojovoi-tehniki-%E2%80%93-zagalni-vtrati-rosii-vid-pochatku-shirokomasshtabnoi-vijni-proti-ukraini/

Translation with Google Translate.

103
submitted 4 months ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
63
submitted 4 months ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

The levvel of anti Ukraine propaganda in USA is insane, here Jake Broe exposes how people like Elon Musk, Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson push a false story about an American youtuber being tortured and dies in a Ukrainian prison.

36
submitted 4 months ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
69
submitted 4 months ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
45
submitted 4 months ago by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
view more: next ›

Buffalox

joined 11 months ago