this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
486 points (95.5% liked)

memes

21878 readers
1400 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

No you wouldn't. All this stuff may seem obvious now but it only does so because somebody figured it out before.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 weeks ago

I mean a lot of what Socrates and Plato wrote and taught are just self justifications for the ancient Greek ruling class.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That delusion is so common that I suspect it must have a name, but I don't know what it is.

But the better a solution appears, the more a person who sees the solution believes it to be obvious, and therefore also believes that, had they tried to solve the problem, they'd have come up with this "obvious" solution straight away with no effort.

Meanwhile, the person who actually solved the problem could only come up with the perfect simple solution after a lifetime of study in the area to the point that you'd call them an expert or master, and after agonizing for a long time over this particular problem.

[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias

"Hindsight bias, also known as the knew-it-all-along phenomenon or creeping determinism, is the common tendency for people to perceive past events as having been more predictable than they were."

It's a kind of cognitive bias that assumes things that are obvious to us would be inevitably found without uncertainty, or trial and error.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Teaching "common sense" is so hard because kids get so offended that you think they are stupid.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Historical projections of population place the global population at roughly 162 million people. Let's say only .1% of the population was capable of this sort of thing. Although I think it's low and while these early Greek philosophers were certainly smart the key to their success was wealth and the ability to focus on their "craft". But I'll really lowball human intelligence

Anyway, at .1% of people that means roughly 162,000 thousand people would be capable. The number of those with resources to actually dedicate the time even smaller.

Today the world population is over 8 billion, but we'll use 8 billion. So at .1% that gives us 8 million people alive today that would be capable.

I really underestimated human intelligence, but the point is the same. We have so so many people alive today that there is certainly quite a few people capable of doing these sorts of things

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

"Einstein is such an idiot. I learned about general relativity in middle school"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the UK our £2 coins have "Standing on the shoulders of giants" written around the rim, to remind us all that no, you wouldn't have thought of that, you berk.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There's also the case of, you arnt rich, noble, and from the ruling class that gives your words enough weight to even be considered less remembered at all.

A great deal many things have been discovered and forgotten and rediscovered. Because the first few times they weren't discovered by a rich enough noble with the power and wealth to spread the knowledge or even get people to listen in the first place.

In ye olden times. It took more then just being smart, you also had to be rich as FUCK or have extremely good connections if not rich as fuck. And in many cases you needed both.

Else you would be ignored, and die with any discovery or advancements you invented in your life.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's a pretty exaggerated account, there were and are plenty of poor ass philosophers and writers and scientists and mathematicians.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (47 children)

The relation between mass & energy seems very intuitive, I've known it for most of my life!
Wdym humanity just recently learned that??

(It's a cognitive bias when you internalise some information you just learned, & suddenly get the feeling that all who don't know it are kinda dumb, like that info wasn't gifted to you by chance/random experience.)

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] kubica@fedia.io 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I could also had put 3 sticks of the same size on one axis and 4 on another and see that between the ends you can fit 5 sticks.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess you wouldn't have figured it out on your own, lol.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I'm the 11th guy

[–] hark@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Too bad I don't get to sit around and think all day so I can discuss with others who sit around and think all day.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Have you tried being born wealthy? Hope this helps!

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That was Plato and Socrates's secret

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Plato, but Socrates worked as a stone mason.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, a society with a vast management/"thinker" class (the rest, including bureaucrats, being slaves) should produce some thinkening shit.

Not as much as a society with universal individual's needs guaranteed (the tech back then just wasn't there), but more than a society with overwhelming oligarchy/feudalism rule where only a random few are allowed to think.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, that's where I messed up. I took the thickener, not the thinkener.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll go further, i reckon i couldve done better than "featherless biped" as the definition of a human.

Honestly they mustve said so much bollocks that people were too embaressed to write down or copy and it was lost to time.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If I recall correctly, "fatherless biped" was an attempt to define a human in the simplest, most basic form, and as short as possible.

I guess they just forgot about gorillas and other primates. Are they classified as bipedal? I mean they don't HAVE to use their arms to move around. It's just more efficient for them...

Of course, I wouldn't have plucked a chicken and presented it ad a fatherless biped, either.. So what do I know lmao

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

At the time, in Greece they thought of apes as monkeys without tails. They also had no reason to think those creatures were particularly bipedal. Or that there was any particular relation to humans. Aristotle was describing Baboons, which walk on all 4s. To Plato, a bird might be the only other creature that walked on two legs. It also has pink skin for what that's worth.

It's easy to forget that the foundation of knowledge we have is so incredibly vast it would be incomprehensible to the ancient Greeks. We learn in elementary school things that people wouldn't work out for centuries.

Imagine telling Diogenes that dolphins are foxes that learned to swim. Or that the giant skulls they keep finding aren't one eyed giants, but the skulls of ancient hairy elephants.

Plato was alive when Greek philosophers decided the earth was round, and it would be a few hundred years before somebody would make the first real calculation of its size.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] platypode@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I guess they just forgot about gorillas

We often take for granted how much information we have about the animal kingdom. Gorillas are native to central Africa; it is highly unlikely Plato ever even met somebody who had seen one. What makes Greek philosophy impressive is how much they were able to accurately describe given the incredibly limited slice of what is now “common knowledge” available to them, and how durable the methods they employed have proven when provided better priors.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I hear the same about the conceptualization of zero as a numeral that operations can be performed on (a crucial turning point in human thinking) which is also laughable. It simply was not compatible with the Greek understanding of mathematics which emphasized the discrete and trigonometric but fit very well into the more abstract view towards math on the Indian subcontinent. There's a reason why human discovery has global roots.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 weeks ago

- Hey dude, you know you had two goats? Well, I took one

- Whatever I still have one goat left


- Hey dude, you know you had one single goat? Well, I took it

- Wtf, that doesn't make sense


👆 real dialogues recorded by actual ancient Greeks

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Simple rule of thumb. If it has no real world use case in your avg dudes day to day.

It ain't getting discovered.

Now you also need to have that avg dude be someone of note, power and reach so that the discovery actually goes somewhere and doesn't just die with him.

The more esoteric and rarer those two things line up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

"Socrates was the wisest man in Athens."

Dude, the population of Athens and it's surrounding territory at the time was about 200k-250k people, a very sizable portion of which were foreigners who probably had a different primary language, and even more of which were slaves (like 1/3 to 1/2 of the entire population). Would be like talking about the wisest person in Dayton, Ohio 2500 years later in every philosophy textbook in the world becuase he realized it was better to say "I dunno" than to talk out of your ass.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know when shitting on the Greek civilization became a thing, but the irony that this trend comes from the same country that voted for Trump twice and made Idiocracy a tame historical documentary is not lost on me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We read portions of Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics in Ethics 101, and I felt this way about everything we went through. Yes, demonstrating admirable traits will lead to a virtuous life. That's almost true by definition. Oh, but you still might not achieve a happy life even if you're a good person? Well, that's because you also need to be lucky! Oh, and generosity is apparently 2 different virtues for some reason.

I'm sure he had other works, but reading his "insights" made me wonder how this could be the guy everyone wouldn't shut up about. We also studied the stoics, epicurians, nihilism and existentialism, Kantian ethics, consequentialism, the role of divinity, and probably other topics I can't remember. Literally all of them were much more interesting than Aristotle's eudaimonia ramblings, so I was quite annoyed that he took up almost half the class and made everything else rushed.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aristotle also believed that women were defective men, that some people are naturally destined to be slaves, and rejected atomic theory.

I feel like you can change this absolutely imbecilic image to “the hole left by everyone just accepted Aristotle’s idea that you can just think everything from first principles and don’t have to do any experimentation” and it’d actually be somewhat accurate.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

okay. the renaissance seems to begin right around the time a dude in turkey invented a steam engine to rotate kebab.

coincidence? who cares. kebab.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

donar kebab is +seventy billion science points

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I admit I am old, but can anybody explain this meme format with an expressionless person making a selfie with a statement at the top? And do I need to be as conventionally attractive as this young man here or do looks not matter?

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It makes me feel old too, lol. I think some people make them with streamers or content creators (maybe?) or just because they need an image, since people are more likely to share something funny if it's not just text. It's a little weird, but whatever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Just keep asking why to everything. My nephew was basically Socrates.

[–] sangeteria@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

I think that if I were intelligentsia in a different period of human development I would go and try to discover something. But that's only because I'm in academia now so as long as I have the prerequisite material conditions my personal impulse for obtaining new knowledge would drive me

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the Manosphere(tm) mindset. They suffer from constant Dunning-Kruger. Ask them about climate change and they’ll suddenly be smarter than climate scientists because they watched a few YouTube videos.

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think this meme is about science, but rather about "thinking about thinking"

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 4 points 3 weeks ago

I know, but it’s the same type of thing dudes in the bro camp do. They obsess over stoicism, Rome, etc. Their ego makes them think they’re thinking on some other plane of existence. Then it starts leaking into science and social topics.

[–] kek_kecske_31@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

This is utter bullcrap. Must be funny somehow, but that I am sadly missing.

load more comments
view more: next ›